Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
48.1% WR
VS
Clove
50.1% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Clove Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 686
48.1%
Win Rate
50.1%
1.37
Avg KDA
1.42
14.8
Avg Kills
17.7
15.3
Avg Deaths
18.2
128.3
DMG/Round
153.5
29.8%
HS %
31.0%
194
Combat Score
234
47.3%
Attack WR
47.9%
52.1%
Defense WR
52.7%
Fade vs Clove Performance Breakdown
In the Fade vs Clove matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 686 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Fade in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Fade in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.37Fade
1.42Clove
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Clove, with KDA ratios of 1.37 and 1.42 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
128.3Fade
153.5Clove
Clove delivers substantially higher damage per round (153.5 ADR) compared to Fade's 128.3 ADR. This 25.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Clove a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
47.3%Fade
47.9%Clove
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 47.3% and Clove at 47.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.1%Fade
52.7%Clove
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 52.1% win rate and Clove at 52.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Clove matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 686 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 50.1% of the time compared to Fade's 48.1%, a 2.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Clove holds a minor advantage, but Fade can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Fade vs Clove Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Fade vs Clove matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 686 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Fade in direct combat scenarios. While Fade manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Fade players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Avg KDA
1.37Fade
1.42Clove
The KDA comparison between Fade and Clove reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Fade averaging 1.37 and Clove posting 1.42. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
14.8Fade
17.7Clove
Clove substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 17.7 kills compared to 14.8 — a difference of nearly 2.9 eliminations per match. When Clove faces Fade, the data clearly shows Clove finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Clove in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.3Fade
18.2Clove
The death disparity between Fade and Clove is stark: 15.3 versus 18.2 deaths per game. Clove dies 2.8 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Fade or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Fade.
DMG/Round
128.3Fade
153.5Clove
The damage differential between Clove and Fade is exceptional: 153.5 ADR compared to just 128.3. Clove deals 25.2 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Clove's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Fade struggles to even trade effectively. Fade players should treat Clove as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
29.8%Fade
31.0%Clove
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.0% vs 29.8%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.3 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Fade can fully react. Fade players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Fade vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
47.3%
47.9%
Defense Side
Clove
52.1%
52.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Fade and Clove reveals near-perfect parity, with Fade winning 47.3% of attacking rounds compared to Clove's 47.9%. This negligible 0.6 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Fade nor Clove should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 686 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Fade and Clove players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Fade or Clove, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Fade has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.6% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Fade and Clove is virtually identical, with Fade holding 52.1% of rounds on CT side and Clove at 52.7%. This 0.6 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Fade and Clove can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.6% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Fade and Clove. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 686 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Fade or Clove.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Fade vs Clove specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.9% attack win rate and 52.7% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Fade remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Fade vs Clove specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Fade and Clove are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Fade is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Fade, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Controller (Clove) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Clove's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Clove's Controller kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Fade vs Clove is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.1% vs 50.1%). Based on 686 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
