Fade vs Iso matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
64.7%
Matches
17
Avg KDA
1.39
Avg ADR
122

Fade vs IsoMatchup

Initiator
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Fade vs Iso matchup breakdown: Fade dominates with a 64.7% win rate across 17 matches. Higher damage output (122 ADR) gives Fade a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.

Fade Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Iso - 64.7% win rateIso(64.7%)
Fade - 64.7% win rate in this matchup
Fade
64.7% WR
VS
Iso vs Fade matchup - 35.3% win rate
Iso
35.3% WR

Who Wins the Fade vs Iso Matchup?

Fade wins the Fade vs Iso matchup
Winner
Fade
Matches: 17
64.7%
Win Rate
35.3%
1.39
Avg KDA
1.39
13.3
Avg Kills
17.8
13.8
Avg Deaths
16.4
122.2
DMG/Round
165.5
27.7%
HS %
31.8%
181
Combat Score
248
62.1%
Attack WR
52.9%
47.1%
Defense WR
37.9%

Fade vs Iso Performance Breakdown

Fade vs Iso matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

The Fade vs Iso matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 17 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.

Fragging Power
1.39Fade
1.39Iso
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Iso, with KDA ratios of 1.39 and 1.39 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
122.2Fade
165.5Iso
Iso delivers substantially higher damage per round (165.5 ADR) compared to Fade's 122.2 ADR. This 43.4 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Iso a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
62.1%Fade
52.9%Iso
On the attacking side, Fade dominates with a 62.1% win rate compared to Iso's 52.9%. This 9.1 percentage point gap indicates Fade is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
47.1%Fade
37.9%Iso
Fade excels on the defensive half with a commanding 47.1% win rate, far surpassing Iso's 37.9%. This 9.1 percentage point advantage demonstrates Fade's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.

Fade vs Iso Matchup Summary

The Fade vs Iso matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 17 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 64.7% of the time compared to Iso's 35.3%, a 29.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Fade has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Fade and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Fade vs Iso Fragging Analysis

Iso wins fragging stats against Fade in Valorant

Iso claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Fade vs Iso matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 17 ranked games reveals Iso consistently outperforms Fade in direct combat scenarios. While Fade manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Iso in gunfights. Fade players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Iso dominates.

KDA
1.39Fade
1.39Iso
The KDA comparison between Fade and Iso reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Fade averaging 1.39 and Iso posting 1.39. This razor-thin margin of just 0.00 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
13.3Fade
17.8Iso
The kill differential between Iso and Fade is dramatic: 17.8 versus 13.3, representing 4.5 additional kills per game for Iso. This massive gap shows Iso consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Fade players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Iso requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Iso's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
13.8Fade
16.4Iso
The death disparity between Fade and Iso is stark: 13.8 versus 16.4 deaths per game. Iso dies 2.5 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Iso either takes unfavorable fights against Fade or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Iso players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Fade.
DMG/Round
122.2Fade
165.5Iso
The damage differential between Iso and Fade is exceptional: 165.5 ADR compared to just 122.2. Iso deals 43.4 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Iso's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Fade struggles to even trade effectively. Fade players should treat Iso as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
Headshot %
27.7%Fade
31.8%Iso
Iso demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Fade: 31.8% versus 27.7%. This 4.0 percentage point gap in precision means Iso ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Fade faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Fade vs Iso Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Fade
Fade62.1%
Iso52.9%
Defense Side
Fade
Fade47.1%
Iso37.9%

Attack Side Breakdown

Fade significantly outperforms Iso on attack side, achieving a 62.1% round win rate versus 52.9%. This 9.1 point disparity reveals Fade as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Iso cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.

Based on 17 matches analyzed, Fade dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Fade significantly. Iso teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Iso for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Iso's direct engagement with Fade, and consider how team composition can cover Iso's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 9.1% gap.

Iso should avoid entry fragging roles against Fade whenever possible. The data clearly shows Fade wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Iso players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Fade confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Fade can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.

Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Fade in this matchup. Iso struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Iso teams should never leave Iso alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Fade should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Fade substantially outclasses Iso on defense, achieving 47.1% round wins compared to 37.9%. This 9.1 percentage point gap indicates Fade excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Iso cannot match.

Iso should never solo anchor against Fade. The 9.1% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Iso. Instead, pair Iso with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Fade should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Iso's.

Retake dynamics heavily favor Fade. When Iso needs to retake against Fade, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Fade should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Iso struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Fade has a significant statistical edge that Iso cannot overcome through individual skill alone.

Economy management becomes critical for Iso in this matchup. Force buying against Fade is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Iso should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Fade can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.

Overall Side Analysis

Fade demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (62.1%) and defense (47.1%), comprehensively outperforming Iso across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 17 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Fade holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Iso's disadvantage in this matchup. Fade outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Iso into Fade, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Iso's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Iso in isolated Fade encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Iso when you expect to face Fade frequently. The 18.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Fade is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Fade decisively wins the Fade vs Iso matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Fade has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Iso players facing Fade should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics

The Initiator (Fade) vs Duelist (Iso) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Iso's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Iso's Duelist kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Fade has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Phoenix at 34.8% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
47.38%3251.36128.329.7%46.7%51.8%
46.60%1911.38130.529.4%47.6%52.1%
57.34%1431.43130.230.9%48.7%55.4%
47.45%1371.41130.131.4%48.9%52.4%
52.76%1271.37126.529.3%45.9%55.2%
50.81%1241.41131.730.1%49.3%51.0%
42.71%961.37131.030.2%48.0%48.9%
36.76%681.25121.729.6%42.9%50.4%
57.69%521.54140.731.1%49.5%57.8%
42.11%381.48137.630.4%48.6%50.4%
52.63%381.40126.532.4%51.3%52.4%
51.52%331.65143.831.1%48.5%54.9%
43.75%321.44132.130.1%47.6%49.6%
53.33%301.47137.730.8%47.3%53.2%
65.38%261.43124.228.1%48.0%60.4%
50.00%261.43126.432.7%46.3%54.0%
64.00%251.37135.029.1%48.6%59.7%
37.50%241.15120.928.7%45.4%46.9%
34.78%231.34143.428.3%42.7%48.2%
42.11%191.50143.331.0%48.2%48.6%
64.71%171.39122.227.7%62.1%47.1%
64.71%171.37126.229.5%60.0%50.6%
43.75%161.32130.027.4%38.3%54.3%
100.00%41.22106.427.0%55.3%70.5%
100.00%31.52135.234.4%50.0%66.7%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Fade's best matchup in Valorant?

Fade's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Fade's hardest matchup?

Fade's hardest matchup is against Phoenix, with only a 34.8% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Fade have?

Fade has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?

When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Initiators