Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
52.3% WR
VS
Jett
46.9% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Jett Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 388
52.3%
Win Rate
46.9%
1.42
Avg KDA
1.25
14.8
Avg Kills
17.3
14.9
Avg Deaths
16.4
130.7
DMG/Round
150.9
30.2%
HS %
29.8%
198
Combat Score
232
48.7%
Attack WR
46.5%
53.5%
Defense WR
51.3%
Fade vs Jett Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 388 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Jett in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Jett shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.42Fade
1.25Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.42 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
130.7Fade
150.9Jett
Jett delivers substantially higher damage per round (150.9 ADR) compared to Fade's 130.7 ADR. This 20.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Jett a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
48.7%Fade
46.5%Jett
Fade shows stronger attack-side performance with a 48.7% win rate versus Jett's 46.5%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Fade provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
53.5%Fade
51.3%Jett
Defensive capabilities favor Fade at 53.5% win rate compared to Jett's 51.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Fade provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Fade vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 388 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 52.3% of the time compared to Jett's 46.9%, a 5.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Fade has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Jett players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Fade vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Fade edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 388 matches analyzed, this Fade vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.
Avg KDA
1.42Fade
1.25Jett
Fade holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.42 compared to Jett's 1.25. While this 0.17 point difference indicates Fade tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Fade's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Jett players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.8Fade
17.3Jett
Jett substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 17.3 kills compared to 14.8 — a difference of nearly 2.5 eliminations per match. When Jett faces Fade, the data clearly shows Jett finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Jett in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.9Fade
16.4Jett
Fade demonstrates markedly better survivability against Jett, recording 14.9 deaths per game versus 16.4. Dying nearly 1.5 fewer times per match gives Fade significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Jett players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
130.7Fade
150.9Jett
The damage differential between Jett and Fade is exceptional: 150.9 ADR compared to just 130.7. Jett deals 20.2 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Jett's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Fade struggles to even trade effectively. Fade players should treat Jett as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
30.2%Fade
29.8%Jett
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Fade (30.2%) and Jett (29.8%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Fade vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
48.7%
46.5%
Defense Side
Fade
53.5%
51.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Jett in this matchup, converting 48.7% of attacking rounds versus 46.5%. While this 2.2 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 388 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Jett teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Jett players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Fade has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Jett should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Jett, winning 53.5% of defense rounds compared to 51.3%. This 2.2 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Jett players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Jett should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Jett should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Jett should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade holds clear advantages on both attack (48.7%) and defense (53.5%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Fade vs Jett matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Fade doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Fade's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Fade performs better. Jett teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Jett with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Jett's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Fade is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Fade provides a measurable ranked advantage. Jett players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Fade confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Fade wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.4 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Jett isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Fade vs Jett head-to-head analysis. Fade holds a 52.3% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 388 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
