Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
47.2% WR
VS
Neon
50.9% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 216
47.2%
Win Rate
50.9%
1.34
Avg KDA
1.26
14.0
Avg Kills
16.7
14.9
Avg Deaths
16.5
124.3
DMG/Round
142.7
29.7%
HS %
21.0%
188
Combat Score
226
49.7%
Attack WR
50.7%
49.3%
Defense WR
50.3%
Fade vs Neon Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 216 matches reveals that Neon holds a clear advantage over Fade in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Fade shows strength in one category, Neon's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.34Fade
1.26Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.34 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
124.3Fade
142.7Neon
Neon delivers substantially higher damage per round (142.7 ADR) compared to Fade's 124.3 ADR. This 18.3 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Neon a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
49.7%Fade
50.7%Neon
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 49.7% and Neon at 50.7% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
49.3%Fade
50.3%Neon
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 49.3% win rate and Neon at 50.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 216 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 50.9% of the time compared to Fade's 47.2%, a 3.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Fade players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Fade vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Fade edges out Neon in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 216 matches analyzed, this Fade vs Neon matchup remains contestable for both sides. Neon shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Neon's favor.
Avg KDA
1.34Fade
1.26Neon
The KDA comparison between Fade and Neon reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Fade averaging 1.34 and Neon posting 1.26. This razor-thin margin of just 0.08 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
14.0Fade
16.7Neon
Neon substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 16.7 kills compared to 14.0 — a difference of nearly 2.6 eliminations per match. When Neon faces Fade, the data clearly shows Neon finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Neon in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.9Fade
16.5Neon
Fade demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 14.9 deaths per game versus 16.5. Dying nearly 1.6 fewer times per match gives Fade significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
124.3Fade
142.7Neon
Neon significantly outdamages Fade in head-to-head encounters, posting 142.7 ADR versus 124.3. This 18.3 damage-per-round advantage means Neon consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Fade players should avoid prolonged dueling with Neon — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.7%Fade
21.0%Neon
The headshot percentage disparity between Fade and Neon is substantial: 29.7% compared to 21.0%, a 8.7 point difference. Fade consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Fade in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Fade's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Fade vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
49.7%
50.7%
Defense Side
Neon
49.3%
50.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Fade in this matchup, converting 50.7% of attacking rounds versus 49.7%. While this 1.0 point edge gives Neon slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Fade players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 216 competitive games suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Fade teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.0% gap.
When taking entry duels, Neon holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Fade players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Fade has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Neon's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Fade should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Fade, winning 50.3% of defense rounds compared to 49.3%. This 1.0 percentage point edge suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Fade players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Neon can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Fade should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Neon demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Neon converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Fade should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Neon when you can wait for teammates. Neon can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Fade should be more conservative with eco aggression against Neon and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.7% attack win rate and 50.3% defense win rate. While Neon is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Fade remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Fade vs Neon specific factors. The slight Neon advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Fade and Neon are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Neon has a slight statistical edge, but Fade is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Fade, don't switch to Neon just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Duelist (Neon) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Neon's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Neon's Duelist kit counters others. The Neon advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.8%
53.4%
53.2%
51.1%
53.7%
49.3%
51.1%
52.1%
49.8%
51.4%
52.4%
50.6%
52.0%
48.8%
52.5%
50.7%
53.3%
54.4%
53.6%
54.5%
50.1%
53.2%
50.0%
61.7%
57.1%
62.8%
73.7%
Fade vs Neon is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.2% vs 50.9%). Based on 216 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
