Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
51.2% WR
VS
Tejo
48.8% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Tejo Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 41
51.2%
Win Rate
48.8%
1.42
Avg KDA
1.29
15.0
Avg Kills
14.5
14.8
Avg Deaths
15.3
133.8
DMG/Round
135.0
29.3%
HS %
25.7%
203
Combat Score
196
47.3%
Attack WR
45.6%
54.4%
Defense WR
52.7%
Fade vs Tejo Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 41 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Tejo in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Tejo shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.42Fade
1.29Tejo
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Tejo, with KDA ratios of 1.42 and 1.29 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
133.8Fade
135.0Tejo
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Fade averaging 133.8 ADR and Tejo at 135.0 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.3%Fade
45.6%Tejo
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 47.3% and Tejo at 45.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
54.4%Fade
52.7%Tejo
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 54.4% win rate and Tejo at 52.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Tejo matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 41 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 51.2% of the time compared to Tejo's 48.8%, a 2.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Initiator matchup, Fade holds a minor advantage, but Tejo can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Fade vs Tejo Fragging Analysis
Fade claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Fade vs Tejo matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 41 ranked games reveals Fade consistently outperforms Tejo in direct combat scenarios. While Tejo manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Fade in gunfights. Tejo players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Fade dominates.
Avg KDA
1.42Fade
1.29Tejo
Fade holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.42 compared to Tejo's 1.29. While this 0.13 point difference indicates Fade tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Tejo players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Fade's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Tejo players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.0Fade
14.5Tejo
Fade secures approximately 0.5 more kills per match than Tejo in this head-to-head (15.0 vs 14.5). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Fade contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Fade's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Tejo can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.8Fade
15.3Tejo
Fade survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.8 times per game compared to Tejo's 15.3 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Fade is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Tejo players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Fade's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
133.8Fade
135.0Tejo
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Fade (133.8 ADR) and Tejo (135.0 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
29.3%Fade
25.7%Tejo
Fade demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Tejo: 29.3% versus 25.7%. This 3.6 percentage point gap in precision means Fade ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Tejo faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Fade vs Tejo Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
47.3%
45.6%
Defense Side
Fade
54.4%
52.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Tejo in this matchup, converting 47.3% of attacking rounds versus 45.6%. While this 1.7 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Tejo players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 41 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Tejo teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.7% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Tejo players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Fade has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Tejo should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.7 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Tejo, winning 54.4% of defense rounds compared to 52.7%. This 1.7 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Tejo players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.7% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Tejo should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Tejo should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.7% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Tejo should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade holds clear advantages on both attack (47.3%) and defense (54.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Fade vs Tejo matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Fade doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Fade's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Fade performs better. Tejo teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Tejo with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Tejo's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Fade is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Fade provides a measurable ranked advantage. Tejo players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Fade confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Fade wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Tejo isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Initiator Dynamics
Both Fade and Tejo fill the Initiator role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Initiator performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Fade is the stronger Initiator pick when these agents face each other.
In Initiator vs Initiator encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Fade's statistical advantage suggests their specific Initiator kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
52.8%
53.4%
53.2%
51.1%
53.7%
49.3%
51.1%
52.1%
49.8%
51.4%
52.4%
50.6%
52.0%
48.8%
52.5%
50.7%
53.3%
54.4%
53.6%
54.5%
50.1%
53.2%
50.0%
61.7%
57.1%
62.8%
73.7%
Fade vs Tejo head-to-head analysis. Fade holds a 51.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 41 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
