Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
50.0% WR
VS
Breach
50.0% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Breach Matchup?
Winner
Iso
Matches: 4
50.0%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.19
Avg KDA
1.43
17.3
Avg Kills
16.3
18.3
Avg Deaths
16.8
158.5
DMG/Round
135.0
31.4%
HS %
35.6%
224
Combat Score
205
59.6%
Attack WR
61.0%
39.0%
Defense WR
40.4%
Iso vs Breach Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 4 matches reveals that Breach holds a clear advantage over Iso in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Iso shows strength in one category, Breach's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.19Iso
1.43Breach
Breach maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.43 KDA versus Iso's 1.19. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Breach players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
158.5Iso
135.0Breach
Iso delivers substantially higher damage per round (158.5 ADR) compared to Breach's 135.0 ADR. This 23.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Iso a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
59.6%Iso
61.0%Breach
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Iso at 59.6% and Breach at 61.0% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
39.0%Iso
40.4%Breach
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Iso posting a 39.0% win rate and Breach at 40.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Iso vs Breach matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 4 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 50.0% of the time compared to Breach's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Breach consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Neither Iso nor Breach has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Iso vs Breach Fragging Analysis
Breach edges out Iso in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 4 matches analyzed, this Iso vs Breach matchup remains contestable for both sides. Iso shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Iso's favor.
Avg KDA
1.19Iso
1.43Breach
Breach holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.43 compared to Iso's 1.19. While this 0.24 point difference indicates Breach tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Breach's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Iso players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
17.3Iso
16.3Breach
Iso secures approximately 1.0 more kills per match than Breach in this head-to-head (17.3 vs 16.3). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Iso contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Iso's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Breach can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
18.3Iso
16.8Breach
Breach demonstrates markedly better survivability against Iso, recording 16.8 deaths per game versus 18.3. Dying nearly 1.5 fewer times per match gives Breach significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Iso players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
158.5Iso
135.0Breach
The damage differential between Iso and Breach is exceptional: 158.5 ADR compared to just 135.0. Iso deals 23.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Iso's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Breach struggles to even trade effectively. Breach players should treat Iso as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
31.4%Iso
35.6%Breach
Breach demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Iso: 35.6% versus 31.4%. This 4.2 percentage point gap in precision means Breach ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Iso faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Iso vs Breach Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Breach
59.6%
61.0%
Defense Side
Breach
39.0%
40.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Breach demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Iso in this matchup, converting 61.0% of attacking rounds versus 59.6%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Breach slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 4 competitive games suggests Breach's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Iso teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Breach holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Iso players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Breach can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Iso has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 72.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.04)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 72.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Breach's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Iso should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Breach shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Iso, winning 40.4% of defense rounds compared to 39.0%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Breach's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Iso players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Breach can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Iso should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Breach demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Breach converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Iso should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Breach when you can wait for teammates. Breach can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Iso should be more conservative with eco aggression against Breach and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Breach can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Breach maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 61.0% attack win rate and 40.4% defense win rate. While Breach is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Iso remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Iso vs Breach specific factors. The slight Breach advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Iso and Breach are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Breach has a slight statistical edge, but Iso is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Iso, don't switch to Breach just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Iso) vs Initiator (Breach) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Breach's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Breach's Initiator kit counters others. The Breach advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Iso vs Breach head-to-head analysis. Iso holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 4 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
