Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
66.7% WR
VS
Vyse
33.3% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Vyse Matchup?
Winner
Iso
Matches: 6
66.7%
Win Rate
33.3%
1.72
Avg KDA
1.16
17.5
Avg Kills
15.5
13.2
Avg Deaths
16.2
174.1
DMG/Round
145.0
27.6%
HS %
34.4%
239
Combat Score
224
50.0%
Attack WR
32.4%
67.6%
Defense WR
50.0%
Iso vs Vyse Performance Breakdown
In the Iso vs Vyse matchup, Iso demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 6 analyzed matches, Iso outperforms Vyse in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Iso the statistically favored pick when facing Vyse in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.72Iso
1.16Vyse
Iso significantly outperforms Vyse in fragging efficiency with a 1.72 KDA compared to 1.16. This 0.56 KDA differential indicates that Iso players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
174.1Iso
145.0Vyse
Iso delivers substantially higher damage per round (174.1 ADR) compared to Vyse's 145.0 ADR. This 29.0 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Iso a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
50.0%Iso
32.4%Vyse
On the attacking side, Iso dominates with a 50.0% win rate compared to Vyse's 32.4%. This 17.6 percentage point gap indicates Iso is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
67.6%Iso
50.0%Vyse
Iso excels on the defensive half with a commanding 67.6% win rate, far surpassing Vyse's 50.0%. This 17.6 percentage point advantage demonstrates Iso's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Iso vs Vyse matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 6 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 66.7% of the time compared to Vyse's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Iso has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Vyse should never take isolated fights against Iso and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Iso vs Vyse Fragging Analysis
Iso claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Iso vs Vyse matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 6 ranked games reveals Iso consistently outperforms Vyse in direct combat scenarios. While Vyse manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Iso in gunfights. Vyse players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Iso dominates.
Avg KDA
1.72Iso
1.16Vyse
The KDA disparity between Iso and Vyse is substantial: 1.72 versus 1.16, a commanding 0.56 point difference that reveals Iso's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 6 games shows Iso consistently outfragging and outliving Vyse in these encounters. For Vyse players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Iso whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Iso's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
17.5Iso
15.5Vyse
Iso substantially outfrags Vyse in this matchup, averaging 17.5 kills compared to 15.5 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Iso faces Vyse, the data clearly shows Iso finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Vyse players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Iso in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
13.2Iso
16.2Vyse
The death disparity between Iso and Vyse is stark: 13.2 versus 16.2 deaths per game. Vyse dies 3.0 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Vyse either takes unfavorable fights against Iso or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Vyse players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Iso.
DMG/Round
174.1Iso
145.0Vyse
The damage differential between Iso and Vyse is exceptional: 174.1 ADR compared to just 145.0. Iso deals 29.0 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Iso's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Vyse struggles to even trade effectively. Vyse players should treat Iso as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
27.6%Iso
34.4%Vyse
The headshot percentage disparity between Vyse and Iso is substantial: 34.4% compared to 27.6%, a 6.9 point difference. Vyse consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Iso, challenging Vyse in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Vyse's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Iso vs Vyse Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Iso
50.0%
32.4%
Defense Side
Iso
67.6%
50.0%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Iso and Vyse is dramatic: 50.0% versus 32.4%, a commanding 17.6 percentage point advantage. Iso dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Vyse to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 6 competitive matches reveals Iso has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Iso. This isn't a gap that Vyse can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Vyse teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Vyse from direct Iso engagement: give Vyse lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Vyse's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Vyse take entry duels against Iso. The 17.6% attack gap makes entry fragging against Iso one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Vyse must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Iso confrontation. Iso should actively hunt Vyse entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Iso has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Vyse's post-plant conversion rate against Iso is catastrophic. The data shows Vyse fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Iso. Never leave Vyse alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Vyse is the only survivor. Iso should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Vyse struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Iso and Vyse is substantial: 67.6% versus 50.0%, a 17.6 point chasm. Iso absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Vyse cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Iso. The 17.6% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Vyse: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Iso's presence is identified on their site. Iso should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Vyse should avoid retake scenarios against Iso entirely when possible. The data from 6 matches shows Vyse's retake conversion rate against Iso is dramatically lower than average. If Vyse must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Iso should play post-plant positions knowing Vyse lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Iso wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Vyse must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Iso is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Vyse should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Iso can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Iso demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (50.0%) and defense (67.6%), comprehensively outperforming Vyse across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 6 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Iso holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Vyse's disadvantage in this matchup. Iso outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Vyse into Iso, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Vyse's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Vyse in isolated Iso encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Vyse when you expect to face Iso frequently. The 35.1 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Iso is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Iso decisively wins the Iso vs Vyse matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Iso has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Vyse players facing Iso should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Iso) vs Sentinel (Vyse) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Vyse's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Vyse's Sentinel kit counters others. The Iso advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Iso vs Vyse matchup breakdown: Iso dominates with a 66.7% win rate across 6 matches. Superior fragging (1.72 KDA) gives Iso a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
