Miks vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Clove

42.2%

48.6%

Defense Side

Clove

51.4%

57.8%

Attack Side Breakdown

Clove significantly outperforms Miks on attack side, achieving a 48.6% round win rate versus 42.2%. This 6.4 point disparity reveals Clove as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Miks cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.

Based on 19 matches analyzed, Clove dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Clove significantly. Miks teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Miks for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Miks's direct engagement with Clove, and consider how team composition can cover Miks's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 6.4% gap.

Miks should avoid entry fragging roles against Clove whenever possible. The data clearly shows Clove wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Miks players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Clove confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Clove can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.

Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Clove in this matchup. Miks struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Miks teams should never leave Miks alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Clove should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Clove substantially outclasses Miks on defense, achieving 57.8% round wins compared to 51.4%. This 6.4 percentage point gap indicates Clove excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Miks cannot match.

Miks should never solo anchor against Clove. The 6.4% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Miks. Instead, pair Miks with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Clove should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Miks's.

Retake dynamics heavily favor Clove. When Miks needs to retake against Clove, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Clove should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Miks struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Clove has a significant statistical edge that Miks cannot overcome through individual skill alone.

Economy management becomes critical for Miks in this matchup. Force buying against Clove is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Miks should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Clove can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.

Overall Side Analysis

Clove demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (48.6%) and defense (57.8%), comprehensively outperforming Miks across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 19 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Clove holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Miks's disadvantage in this matchup. Clove outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Miks into Clove, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Miks's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Miks in isolated Clove encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Miks when you expect to face Clove frequently. The 12.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Clove is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Clove decisively wins the Miks vs Clove matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Clove has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Miks players facing Clove should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Controller vs Controller Dynamics

Both Miks and Clove fill the Controller role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Controller performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Clove is the stronger Controller pick when these agents face each other.

In Controller vs Controller encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Clove's statistical advantage suggests their specific Controller kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.