Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Miks's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Analysis of 12 matches reveals that Phoenix holds a clear advantage over Miks in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Miks shows strength in one category, Phoenix's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
The Miks vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 12 competitive matches analyzed, Miks wins 58.3% of the time compared to Phoenix's 41.7%, a 16.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Miks consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Miks has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Miks and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Miks edges out Phoenix in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 12 matches analyzed, this Miks vs Phoenix matchup remains contestable for both sides. Phoenix shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Phoenix's favor.
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Miks in this matchup, converting 47.3% of attacking rounds versus 45.4%. While this 1.9 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Miks players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 12 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Miks teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.9% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Miks players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Miks has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Miks's strongest matchup is against Cypher with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 14.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.73% | 37 | 1.60 | 120.5 | 28.7% | 46.2% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Miks's best matchup is against Cypher, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Miks excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Miks's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 14.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Miks should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Miks has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Miks in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Miks's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Miks's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Miks should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.9 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Miks, winning 54.6% of defense rounds compared to 52.7%. This 1.9 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Miks players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.9% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Miks should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Miks should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.9% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Miks should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Phoenix holds clear advantages on both attack (47.3%) and defense (54.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Miks vs Phoenix matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Phoenix doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Phoenix's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Phoenix performs better. Miks teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Miks with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Miks's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Phoenix is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Phoenix provides a measurable ranked advantage. Miks players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Phoenix confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Phoenix wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.8 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Miks isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
The Controller (Miks) vs Duelist (Phoenix) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Miks's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Phoenix's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Miks's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Phoenix's Duelist kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 44.1% |
| 51.61% | 31 | 2.03 | 140.2 | 28.8% | 50.3% | 51.0% |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.81 | 137.7 | 29.9% | 48.6% | 50.6% |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.78 | 120.7 | 28.5% | 44.4% | 51.6% |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.53 | 122.4 | 30.2% | 50.0% | 46.4% |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.59 | 121.4 | 28.4% | 40.5% | 52.3% |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.84 | 127.5 | 30.2% | 58.3% | 44.5% |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.75 | 135.2 | 31.2% | 45.4% | 52.7% |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.04 | 160.0 | 33.7% | 50.8% | 49.6% |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.76 | 138.8 | 24.7% | 46.6% | 40.6% |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.67 | 125.1 | 28.9% | 43.2% | 58.3% |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.83 | 134.0 | 30.5% | 40.6% | 46.2% |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.66 | 136.5 | 31.2% | 48.4% | 38.2% |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.76 | 108.0 | 28.3% | 43.9% | 59.3% |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.62 | 133.5 | 29.8% | 38.0% | 59.1% |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.92 | 117.6 | 25.4% | 53.3% | 58.6% |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.76 | 144.0 | 30.2% | 47.4% | 52.8% |
| 100.00% | 4 | 2.05 | 130.9 | 31.3% | 48.8% | 66.7% |
| 50.00% | 4 | 2.44 | 158.0 | 30.8% | 52.5% | 61.4% |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.83 | 136.2 | 26.8% | 33.3% | 64.4% |
Miks vs Phoenix matchup breakdown: Miks dominates with a 58.3% win rate across 12 matches. Superior fragging (1.75 KDA) gives Miks a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.