Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
In the Phoenix vs Tejo matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 14 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Tejo in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Tejo in ranked Valorant matches.
The Phoenix vs Tejo matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 14 competitive matches analyzed, Phoenix wins 50.0% of the time compared to Tejo's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Neither Phoenix nor Tejo has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Phoenix claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Phoenix vs Tejo matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 14 ranked games reveals Phoenix consistently outperforms Tejo in direct combat scenarios. While Tejo manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Phoenix in gunfights. Tejo players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Phoenix dominates.
Phoenix holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Phoenix vs Tejo matchup, winning 50.9% of offensive rounds compared to 46.2% for Tejo. This 4.7 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 14 matches reveals Phoenix's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Phoenix consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Tejo teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Phoenix's favor in this matchup. When Phoenix takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Tejo. For Tejo players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Phoenix's advantages. Phoenix can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.54% | 244 | 1.37 | 147.9 | 30.1% | 47.9% | 51.2% | |
| 47.50% | 240 | 1.44 | 154.3 | 30.2% | 46.8% | ||
| 47.50% | 160 | 1.41 | 152.3 | 31.3% | 48.2% | ||
| 48.43% | 159 | 1.45 | 157.2 | 31.2% | 46.1% | ||
| 53.45% | 116 | 1.44 | 151.2 | 30.5% | 47.7% | ||
| 47.56% | 82 | 1.41 | 150.3 | 30.8% | 47.5% | ||
| 42.31% | 78 | 1.38 | 149.1 | 30.0% | 47.6% | ||
| 52.24% | 67 | 1.48 | 158.9 | 31.0% | 48.6% | ||
| 54.24% | 59 | 1.46 | 155.7 | 29.5% | 46.2% | ||
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.34 | 150.6 | 31.6% | 48.4% | ||
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.49 | 157.9 | 30.5% | 44.9% | ||
| 40.00% | 45 | 1.35 | 153.2 | 31.8% | 45.5% | ||
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.59 | 165.8 | 27.5% | 49.4% | ||
| 62.07% | 29 | 1.52 | 161.8 | 30.3% | 51.4% | ||
| 44.44% | 27 | 1.23 | 137.9 | 25.4% | 48.4% | ||
| 80.95% | 21 | 1.63 | 158.0 | 32.0% | 55.6% | ||
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.41 | 153.3 | 28.1% | 45.3% | ||
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.24 | 146.9 | 28.8% | 43.9% | ||
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.26 | 140.5 | 24.4% | 45.0% | ||
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.29 | 146.1 | 31.7% | 49.4% | ||
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.47 | 152.4 | 32.7% | 50.9% | ||
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.36 | 152.4 | 25.9% | 47.3% | ||
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.45 | 154.2 | 24.8% | 50.0% | ||
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.09 | 129.4 | 24.6% | 40.8% | ||
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.60 | 152.0 | 23.1% | 43.5% | ||
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.36 | 156.4 | 33.7% | 47.9% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Phoenix has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Phoenix's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.7% attack-side gap suggests Phoenix excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Tejo should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Phoenix's kit advantages become decisive. For Phoenix, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Phoenix demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Tejo, holding 53.8% of rounds versus 49.1%. This 4.7 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Phoenix's defensive advantage. Phoenix can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Tejo should avoid solo anchor positions against Phoenix — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Tejo's site with Phoenix on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Phoenix in this matchup. Our 14 match analysis shows Phoenix converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Tejo should never attempt solo retakes against Phoenix — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Phoenix can confidently take 1vX retakes that Tejo should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Phoenix's defensive advantages. Tejo should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Phoenix, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Phoenix can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Tejo should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Phoenix demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (50.9%) and defense (53.8%), comprehensively outperforming Tejo across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 14 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Phoenix holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Tejo's disadvantage in this matchup. Phoenix outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Tejo into Phoenix, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Tejo's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Tejo in isolated Phoenix encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Tejo when you expect to face Phoenix frequently. The 9.4 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Phoenix is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Phoenix decisively wins the Phoenix vs Tejo matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Phoenix has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Tejo players facing Phoenix should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Initiator (Tejo) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Tejo's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Tejo's Initiator kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 53.2% |
| 51.3% |
| 53.5% |
| 55.2% |
| 54.4% |
| 50.8% |
| 52.8% |
| 55.1% |
| 49.5% |
| 56.1% |
| 50.1% |
| 51.8% |
| 59.1% |
| 46.5% |
| 62.3% |
| 49.0% |
| 48.1% |
| 52.9% |
| 47.8% |
| 53.8% |
| 54.6% |
| 51.8% |
| 53.1% |
| 64.2% |
| 54.3% |
Phoenix vs Tejo head-to-head analysis. Phoenix holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 14 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.