Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sova
57.1% WR
VS
Deadlock
42.9% WR
Who Wins the Sova vs Deadlock Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 7
57.1%
Win Rate
42.9%
1.52
Avg KDA
1.07
15.9
Avg Kills
12.4
14.1
Avg Deaths
16.0
149.6
DMG/Round
116.6
34.3%
HS %
28.3%
209
Combat Score
168
44.2%
Attack WR
32.3%
67.7%
Defense WR
55.8%
Sova vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown
In the Sova vs Deadlock matchup, Sova demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 7 analyzed matches, Sova outperforms Deadlock in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Sova the statistically favored pick when facing Deadlock in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.52Sova
1.07Deadlock
Sova maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.52 KDA versus Deadlock's 1.07. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Sova players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
149.6Sova
116.6Deadlock
Sova delivers substantially higher damage per round (149.6 ADR) compared to Deadlock's 116.6 ADR. This 33.0 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Sova a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
44.2%Sova
32.3%Deadlock
On the attacking side, Sova dominates with a 44.2% win rate compared to Deadlock's 32.3%. This 11.9 percentage point gap indicates Sova is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
67.7%Sova
55.8%Deadlock
Sova excels on the defensive half with a commanding 67.7% win rate, far surpassing Deadlock's 55.8%. This 11.9 percentage point advantage demonstrates Sova's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Sova vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 57.1% of the time compared to Deadlock's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Deadlock should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Sova vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis
Sova achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Deadlock in the Sova vs Deadlock matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Sova holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 7 competitive matches, Sova players can approach duels against Deadlock with confidence, while Deadlock players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.52Sova
1.07Deadlock
Sova demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Deadlock, maintaining a 1.52 KDA versus 1.07. This 0.44 point gap reflects Sova's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Deadlock players facing Sova should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Sova's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.9Sova
12.4Deadlock
The kill differential between Sova and Deadlock is dramatic: 15.9 versus 12.4, representing 3.4 additional kills per game for Sova. This massive gap shows Sova consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Deadlock players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Sova requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Sova's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
14.1Sova
16.0Deadlock
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Deadlock, recording 14.1 deaths per game versus 16.0. Dying nearly 1.9 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Deadlock players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
149.6Sova
116.6Deadlock
The damage differential between Sova and Deadlock is exceptional: 149.6 ADR compared to just 116.6. Sova deals 33.0 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Sova's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Deadlock struggles to even trade effectively. Deadlock players should treat Sova as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
34.3%Sova
28.3%Deadlock
The headshot percentage disparity between Sova and Deadlock is substantial: 34.3% compared to 28.3%, a 6.0 point difference. Sova consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Deadlock, challenging Sova in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Sova's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Sova vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
44.2%
32.3%
Defense Side
Sova
67.7%
55.8%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Sova and Deadlock is dramatic: 44.2% versus 32.3%, a commanding 11.9 percentage point advantage. Sova dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Deadlock to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 7 competitive matches reveals Sova has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Sova. This isn't a gap that Deadlock can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Deadlock teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Deadlock from direct Sova engagement: give Deadlock lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Deadlock's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Deadlock take entry duels against Sova. The 11.9% attack gap makes entry fragging against Sova one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Deadlock must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Sova confrontation. Sova should actively hunt Deadlock entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Sova has favorable matchups against 19 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 73.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sova matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.04)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 73.3% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 19 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Deadlock's post-plant conversion rate against Sova is catastrophic. The data shows Deadlock fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Sova. Never leave Deadlock alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Deadlock is the only survivor. Sova should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Deadlock struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Sova and Deadlock is substantial: 67.7% versus 55.8%, a 11.9 point chasm. Sova absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Deadlock cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Sova. The 11.9% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Deadlock: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Sova's presence is identified on their site. Sova should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Deadlock should avoid retake scenarios against Sova entirely when possible. The data from 7 matches shows Deadlock's retake conversion rate against Sova is dramatically lower than average. If Deadlock must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Sova should play post-plant positions knowing Deadlock lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Sova wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Deadlock must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Sova is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Deadlock should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Sova can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (44.2%) and defense (67.7%), comprehensively outperforming Deadlock across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 7 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sova holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Deadlock's disadvantage in this matchup. Sova outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Deadlock into Sova, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Deadlock's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Deadlock in isolated Sova encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Deadlock when you expect to face Sova frequently. The 23.8 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sova is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Sova decisively wins the Sova vs Deadlock matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sova has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Deadlock players facing Sova should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Sentinel (Deadlock) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Deadlock's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Deadlock's Sentinel kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova vs Deadlock matchup breakdown: Sova dominates with a 57.1% win rate across 7 matches. Superior fragging (1.52 KDA) gives Sova a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
