Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sova
47.6% WR
VS
Clove
51.2% WR
Who Wins the Sova vs Clove Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 763
47.6%
Win Rate
51.2%
1.39
Avg KDA
1.38
14.9
Avg Kills
17.2
14.7
Avg Deaths
18.0
138.6
DMG/Round
151.6
30.8%
HS %
32.1%
202
Combat Score
229
47.7%
Attack WR
48.6%
51.4%
Defense WR
52.3%
Sova vs Clove Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 763 matches reveals that Clove holds a clear advantage over Sova in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Sova shows strength in one category, Clove's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.39Sova
1.38Clove
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Sova and Clove, with KDA ratios of 1.39 and 1.38 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
138.6Sova
151.6Clove
Clove outputs 151.6 average damage per round, edging out Sova's 138.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Clove secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.7%Sova
48.6%Clove
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Sova at 47.7% and Clove at 48.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.4%Sova
52.3%Clove
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Sova posting a 51.4% win rate and Clove at 52.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Sova vs Clove matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 763 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 51.2% of the time compared to Sova's 47.6%, a 3.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Clove has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Sova players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Sova vs Clove Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Sova in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 763 matches analyzed, this Sova vs Clove matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sova shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sova's favor.
Avg KDA
1.39Sova
1.38Clove
The KDA comparison between Sova and Clove reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Sova averaging 1.39 and Clove posting 1.38. This razor-thin margin of just 0.02 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
14.9Sova
17.2Clove
Clove substantially outfrags Sova in this matchup, averaging 17.2 kills compared to 14.9 — a difference of nearly 2.3 eliminations per match. When Clove faces Sova, the data clearly shows Clove finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sova players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Clove in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.7Sova
18.0Clove
The death disparity between Sova and Clove is stark: 14.7 versus 18.0 deaths per game. Clove dies 3.3 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Sova or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Sova.
DMG/Round
138.6Sova
151.6Clove
Clove significantly outdamages Sova in head-to-head encounters, posting 151.6 ADR versus 138.6. This 13.0 damage-per-round advantage means Clove consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sova players should avoid prolonged dueling with Clove — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
30.8%Sova
32.1%Clove
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (32.1% vs 30.8%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.3 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sova can fully react. Sova players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Sova vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
47.7%
48.6%
Defense Side
Clove
51.4%
52.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Sova and Clove reveals near-perfect parity, with Sova winning 47.7% of attacking rounds compared to Clove's 48.6%. This negligible 0.9 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Sova nor Clove should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 763 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Sova and Clove players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Sova or Clove, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Sova has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 71.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 40.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sova matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 71.0% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 40.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.9% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Sova and Clove is virtually identical, with Sova holding 51.4% of rounds on CT side and Clove at 52.3%. This 0.9 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Sova and Clove can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.9% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Sova and Clove. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 763 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Sova or Clove.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Sova vs Clove specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.6% attack win rate and 52.3% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Sova remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Sova vs Clove specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Sova and Clove are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Sova is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Sova, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Controller (Clove) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Clove's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Clove's Controller kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova vs Clove is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.6% vs 51.2%). Based on 763 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
