Sova vs CloveMatchup
Sova vs Clove is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.8% vs 53.2%). Based on 216 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
Sova Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Sova vs Clove Matchup?
Sova vs Clove Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 216 matches reveals that Clove holds a clear advantage over Sova in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Sova shows strength in one category, Clove's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Sova vs Clove Matchup Summary
The Sova vs Clove matchup in Valorant is a significant advantage for one side. Based on 216 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 53.2% of the time compared to Sova's 46.8%, a 6.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Clove dominates this matchup statistically. Clove can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Sova should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Sova vs Clove Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Sova in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 216 matches analyzed, this Sova vs Clove matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sova shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sova's favor.
Sova vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Clove demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Sova in this matchup, converting 49.1% of attacking rounds versus 47.9%. While this 1.2 point edge gives Clove slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Sova players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 216 competitive games suggests Clove's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Sova teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Clove holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Sova players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Clove can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Clove's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Sova should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Clove shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Sova, winning 52.1% of defense rounds compared to 50.9%. This 1.2 percentage point edge suggests Clove's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Sova players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Clove can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Sova should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Clove demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Clove converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Sova should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Clove when you can wait for teammates. Clove can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Sova should be more conservative with eco aggression against Clove and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Clove can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.1% attack win rate and 52.1% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Sova remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Sova vs Clove specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Sova and Clove are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Sova is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Sova, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Controller (Clove) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Clove's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Clove's Controller kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 20.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.68% | 221 | 1.37 | 137.3 | 32.9% | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 46.76% | 216 | 1.38 | 138.9 | 31.4% | 47.9% | 50.9% | |
| 51.78% | 197 | 1.37 | 135.9 | 31.2% | 51.4% | 50.1% | |
| 49.63% | 135 | 1.27 | 132.0 | 33.0% | 47.3% | 51.2% | |
| 50.43% | 117 | 1.35 | 134.6 | 32.0% | 51.2% | 49.7% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.32 | 133.1 | 29.0% | 49.0% | 51.2% | |
| 36.67% | 60 | 1.33 | 136.5 | 28.8% | 46.0% | 45.9% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 1.34 | 141.6 | 32.9% | 49.3% | 47.5% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 1.34 | 131.8 | 32.7% | 52.6% | 49.3% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 1.27 | 126.9 | 30.4% | 45.7% | 53.0% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 1.44 | 139.3 | 31.0% | 46.1% | 52.0% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.29 | 135.2 | 33.1% | 47.6% | 49.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.46 | 141.1 | 28.4% | 51.4% | 48.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.30 | 138.1 | 28.9% | 48.6% | 49.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.17 | 127.7 | 31.4% | 44.3% | 51.4% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.30 | 132.4 | 28.6% | 40.1% | 52.4% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 1.29 | 147.2 | 31.4% | 47.3% | 43.6% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.36 | 134.2 | 29.2% | 38.0% | 57.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.54 | 119.6 | 32.3% | 63.0% | 75.9% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.34 | 149.2 | 28.3% | 34.7% | 53.1% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.54 | 142.0 | 30.3% | 68.3% | 38.9% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.31 | 118.9 | 33.6% | 58.2% | 48.9% | |
| 25.00% | 4 | 1.18 | 133.5 | 36.8% | 51.5% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.69 | 135.9 | 35.6% | 56.4% | 39.5% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sova's best matchup in Valorant?
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 20.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.