Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sova
52.5% WR
VS
Vyse
47.5% WR
Who Wins the Sova vs Vyse Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 61
52.5%
Win Rate
47.5%
1.52
Avg KDA
1.26
15.0
Avg Kills
14.9
14.0
Avg Deaths
15.1
140.3
DMG/Round
136.9
30.2%
HS %
35.9%
205
Combat Score
203
51.3%
Attack WR
49.2%
50.8%
Defense WR
48.7%
Sova vs Vyse Performance Breakdown
In the Sova vs Vyse matchup, Sova demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 61 analyzed matches, Sova outperforms Vyse in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Sova the statistically favored pick when facing Vyse in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.52Sova
1.26Vyse
Sova maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.52 KDA versus Vyse's 1.26. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Sova players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
140.3Sova
136.9Vyse
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Sova averaging 140.3 ADR and Vyse at 136.9 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
51.3%Sova
49.2%Vyse
Sova shows stronger attack-side performance with a 51.3% win rate versus Vyse's 49.2%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Sova provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
50.8%Sova
48.7%Vyse
Defensive capabilities favor Sova at 50.8% win rate compared to Vyse's 48.7%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Sova provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Sova vs Vyse matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 61 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 52.5% of the time compared to Vyse's 47.5%, a 4.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Sova has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Vyse players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Sova vs Vyse Fragging Analysis
Sova claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Sova vs Vyse matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 61 ranked games reveals Sova consistently outperforms Vyse in direct combat scenarios. While Vyse manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Sova in gunfights. Vyse players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Sova dominates.
Avg KDA
1.52Sova
1.26Vyse
Sova demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Vyse, maintaining a 1.52 KDA versus 1.26. This 0.26 point gap reflects Sova's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Vyse players facing Sova should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Sova's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.0Sova
14.9Vyse
Kill production between Sova and Vyse is virtually identical, with Sova averaging 15.0 kills per game and Vyse securing 14.9. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
14.0Sova
15.1Vyse
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Vyse, recording 14.0 deaths per game versus 15.1. Dying nearly 1.1 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Vyse players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
140.3Sova
136.9Vyse
Sova applies 3.4 more damage per round than Vyse in this matchup (140.3 vs 136.9 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Sova contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Vyse can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.2%Sova
35.9%Vyse
The headshot percentage disparity between Vyse and Sova is substantial: 35.9% compared to 30.2%, a 5.7 point difference. Vyse consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Sova, challenging Vyse in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Vyse's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Sova vs Vyse Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
51.3%
49.2%
Defense Side
Sova
50.8%
48.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Vyse in this matchup, converting 51.3% of attacking rounds versus 49.2%. While this 2.1 point edge gives Sova slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Vyse players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 61 competitive games suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Vyse teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Sova holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Vyse players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Sova has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 71.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 40.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sova matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 71.0% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 40.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Sova's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Vyse should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Vyse, winning 50.8% of defense rounds compared to 48.7%. This 2.1 percentage point edge suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Vyse players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Sova can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Vyse should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Sova demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sova converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Vyse should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sova when you can wait for teammates. Sova can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Vyse should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sova and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova holds clear advantages on both attack (51.3%) and defense (50.8%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Sova vs Vyse matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sova doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sova's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sova performs better. Vyse teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Vyse with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Vyse's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sova is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sova provides a measurable ranked advantage. Vyse players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sova confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sova wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Vyse isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Sentinel (Vyse) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Vyse's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Vyse's Sentinel kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova vs Vyse head-to-head analysis. Sova holds a 52.5% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 61 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
