Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sova
66.7% WR
VS
Brimstone
33.3% WR
Who Wins the Sova vs Brimstone Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 9
66.7%
Win Rate
33.3%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.47
14.1
Avg Kills
13.2
15.2
Avg Deaths
16.0
133.2
DMG/Round
121.3
29.8%
HS %
18.8%
186
Combat Score
185
60.4%
Attack WR
45.3%
54.7%
Defense WR
39.6%
Sova vs Brimstone Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 9 matches reveals that Sova holds a clear advantage over Brimstone in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Brimstone shows strength in one category, Sova's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.27Sova
1.47Brimstone
Brimstone maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.47 KDA versus Sova's 1.27. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Brimstone players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
133.2Sova
121.3Brimstone
Sova outputs 133.2 average damage per round, edging out Brimstone's 121.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Sova secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
60.4%Sova
45.3%Brimstone
On the attacking side, Sova dominates with a 60.4% win rate compared to Brimstone's 45.3%. This 15.1 percentage point gap indicates Sova is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
54.7%Sova
39.6%Brimstone
Sova excels on the defensive half with a commanding 54.7% win rate, far surpassing Brimstone's 39.6%. This 15.1 percentage point advantage demonstrates Sova's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Sova vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 9 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 66.7% of the time compared to Brimstone's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Brimstone should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Sova vs Brimstone Fragging Analysis
Sova claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Sova vs Brimstone matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 9 ranked games reveals Sova consistently outperforms Brimstone in direct combat scenarios. While Brimstone manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Sova in gunfights. Brimstone players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Sova dominates.
Avg KDA
1.27Sova
1.47Brimstone
Brimstone holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.47 compared to Sova's 1.27. While this 0.20 point difference indicates Brimstone tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Sova players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Brimstone's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Sova players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.1Sova
13.2Brimstone
Sova secures approximately 0.9 more kills per match than Brimstone in this head-to-head (14.1 vs 13.2). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Sova contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Sova's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Brimstone can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.2Sova
16.0Brimstone
Sova survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.2 times per game compared to Brimstone's 16.0 deaths. This 0.8 death difference per match means Sova is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Brimstone players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sova's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
133.2Sova
121.3Brimstone
Sova significantly outdamages Brimstone in head-to-head encounters, posting 133.2 ADR versus 121.3. This 11.9 damage-per-round advantage means Sova consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Brimstone players should avoid prolonged dueling with Sova — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.8%Sova
18.8%Brimstone
The headshot percentage disparity between Sova and Brimstone is substantial: 29.8% compared to 18.8%, a 11.0 point difference. Sova consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Brimstone, challenging Sova in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Sova's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Sova vs Brimstone Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
60.4%
45.3%
Defense Side
Sova
54.7%
39.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Sova and Brimstone is dramatic: 60.4% versus 45.3%, a commanding 15.1 percentage point advantage. Sova dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Brimstone to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 9 competitive matches reveals Sova has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Sova. This isn't a gap that Brimstone can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Brimstone teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Brimstone from direct Sova engagement: give Brimstone lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Brimstone's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Brimstone take entry duels against Sova. The 15.1% attack gap makes entry fragging against Sova one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Brimstone must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Sova confrontation. Sova should actively hunt Brimstone entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Sova has favorable matchups against 19 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 73.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sova matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.04)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 73.3% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 19 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Brimstone's post-plant conversion rate against Sova is catastrophic. The data shows Brimstone fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Sova. Never leave Brimstone alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Brimstone is the only survivor. Sova should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Brimstone struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Sova and Brimstone is substantial: 54.7% versus 39.6%, a 15.1 point chasm. Sova absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Brimstone cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Sova. The 15.1% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Brimstone: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Sova's presence is identified on their site. Sova should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Brimstone should avoid retake scenarios against Sova entirely when possible. The data from 9 matches shows Brimstone's retake conversion rate against Sova is dramatically lower than average. If Brimstone must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Sova should play post-plant positions knowing Brimstone lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Sova wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Brimstone must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Sova is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Brimstone should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Sova can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (60.4%) and defense (54.7%), comprehensively outperforming Brimstone across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 9 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sova holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Brimstone's disadvantage in this matchup. Sova outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Brimstone into Sova, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Brimstone's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Brimstone in isolated Sova encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Brimstone when you expect to face Sova frequently. The 30.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sova is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Sova decisively wins the Sova vs Brimstone matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sova has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Brimstone players facing Sova should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Controller (Brimstone) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Brimstone's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Brimstone's Controller kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova vs Brimstone matchup breakdown: Sova dominates with a 66.7% win rate across 9 matches. Higher damage output (133 ADR) gives Sova a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
