Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sova's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sova
51.2% WR
VS
Jett
48.0% WR
Who Wins the Sova vs Jett Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 879
51.2%
Win Rate
48.0%
1.38
Avg KDA
1.23
14.7
Avg Kills
17.0
14.7
Avg Deaths
16.2
138.2
DMG/Round
148.0
31.5%
HS %
31.2%
200
Combat Score
227
49.4%
Attack WR
49.0%
51.0%
Defense WR
50.5%
Sova vs Jett Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 879 matches reveals that Sova holds a clear advantage over Jett in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Jett shows strength in one category, Sova's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.38Sova
1.23Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Sova and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.38 and 1.23 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
138.2Sova
148.0Jett
Jett outputs 148.0 average damage per round, edging out Sova's 138.2 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.4%Sova
49.0%Jett
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Sova at 49.4% and Jett at 49.0% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.0%Sova
50.5%Jett
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Sova posting a 51.0% win rate and Jett at 50.5%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Sova vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 879 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 51.2% of the time compared to Jett's 48.0%, a 3.2 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Sova has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Jett players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Sova vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Sova edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 879 matches analyzed, this Sova vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.
Avg KDA
1.38Sova
1.23Jett
Sova holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.38 compared to Jett's 1.23. While this 0.14 point difference indicates Sova tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sova's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Jett players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.7Sova
17.0Jett
Jett substantially outfrags Sova in this matchup, averaging 17.0 kills compared to 14.7 — a difference of nearly 2.3 eliminations per match. When Jett faces Sova, the data clearly shows Jett finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sova players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Jett in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.7Sova
16.2Jett
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Jett, recording 14.7 deaths per game versus 16.2. Dying nearly 1.5 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Jett players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
138.2Sova
148.0Jett
Jett applies 9.8 more damage per round than Sova in this matchup (148.0 vs 138.2 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Jett contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Sova can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
31.5%Sova
31.2%Jett
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Sova (31.5%) and Jett (31.2%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Sova vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
49.4%
49.0%
Defense Side
Sova
51.0%
50.5%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Sova and Jett reveals near-perfect parity, with Sova winning 49.4% of attacking rounds compared to Jett's 49.0%. This negligible 0.5 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Sova nor Jett should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 879 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Sova and Jett players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Sova or Jett, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Sova has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Sova's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 71.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 40.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sova matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sova's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 71.0% win rate. Sova excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sova's hardest matchup?
Sova's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 40.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sova should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sova have?
Sova has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sova in difficult matchups?
When playing Sova in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sova's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sova's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sova's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.5% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Sova and Jett is virtually identical, with Sova holding 51.0% of rounds on CT side and Jett at 50.5%. This 0.5 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Sova and Jett can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.5% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Sova and Jett. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 879 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Sova or Jett.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Sova vs Jett specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.4% attack win rate and 51.0% defense win rate. While Sova is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Jett remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Sova vs Jett specific factors. The slight Sova advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Sova and Jett are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Sova has a slight statistical edge, but Jett is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Jett, don't switch to Sova just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics
The Initiator (Sova) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sova's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sova's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sova vs Jett head-to-head analysis. Sova holds a 51.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 879 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
