Esta tabla clasifica las composiciones de TFT Set 16 por su colocación promedio, mostrando qué comps logran consistentemente las mejores posiciones. Composiciones de 8 campeones del Set 16: Protector (88.9% WR, 2.6 prom), Protector (82.9% WR, 2.6 prom), Coloso (81.3% WR, 2.8 prom). Protector/Defensor lidera con 88.89% de win rate y 2.58 de placement promedio. Protector sigue con 82.86% de win rate. Analizando 74 composiciones de 8 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Traits | Avg | Win | First | Pick | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.58 Avg Place | 88.89% Win Rate | 36.11% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
2.60 Avg Place | 82.86% Win Rate | 31.43% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
2.77 Avg Place | 81.25% Win Rate | 32.14% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | |||||
3.12 Avg Place | 79.10% Win Rate | 19.21% First Place | 0.56% Pick Rate | |||||
3.15 Avg Place | 78.87% Win Rate | 16.49% First Place | 0.31% Pick Rate | |||||
3.15 Avg Place | 80.00% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.22 Avg Place | 78.13% Win Rate | 18.75% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
3.38 Avg Place | 74.46% Win Rate | 16.31% First Place | 0.52% Pick Rate | |||||
3.40 Avg Place | 73.61% Win Rate | 13.89% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
3.42 Avg Place | 74.10% Win Rate | 12.65% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | |||||
3.52 Avg Place | 62.50% Win Rate | 16.67% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.74 Avg Place | 66.67% Win Rate | 18.52% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
3.77 Avg Place | 64.34% Win Rate | 11.63% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
3.83 Avg Place | 63.12% Win Rate | 17.02% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | |||||
3.83 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 9.86% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
3.83 Avg Place | 66.96% Win Rate | 13.04% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | |||||
3.89 Avg Place | 58.33% Win Rate | 19.44% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.90 Avg Place | 75.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.93 Avg Place | 57.14% Win Rate | 17.86% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
4.03 Avg Place | 56.25% Win Rate | 12.50% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.05 Avg Place | 70.00% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.09 Avg Place | 55.88% Win Rate | 20.59% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.29 Avg Place | 58.12% Win Rate | 6.84% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
4.33 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.37 Avg Place | 65.12% Win Rate | 2.33% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
4.37 Avg Place | 52.67% Win Rate | 8.67% First Place | 0.24% Pick Rate | |||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.79% Win Rate | 5.48% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
4.40 Avg Place | 40.00% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.41 Avg Place | 59.18% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
4.43 Avg Place | 48.57% Win Rate | 11.43% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.53 Avg Place | 54.05% Win Rate | 3.24% First Place | 0.30% Pick Rate | |||||
4.54 Avg Place | 46.84% Win Rate | 13.50% First Place | 0.38% Pick Rate | |||||
4.56 Avg Place | 55.56% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.60 Avg Place | 42.50% Win Rate | 17.50% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.63 Avg Place | 46.99% Win Rate | 7.83% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | |||||
4.65 Avg Place | 50.00% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.70 Avg Place | 48.57% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
4.76 Avg Place | 42.86% Win Rate | 2.86% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
4.79 Avg Place | 40.00% Win Rate | 2.86% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
4.79 Avg Place | 44.10% Win Rate | 8.07% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | |||||
4.89 Avg Place | 37.59% Win Rate | 8.27% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
4.91 Avg Place | 50.67% Win Rate | 8.00% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
4.92 Avg Place | 38.89% Win Rate | 2.78% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.96 Avg Place | 39.13% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
4.97 Avg Place | 41.38% Win Rate | 1.72% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.97 Avg Place | 40.34% Win Rate | 5.88% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
4.98 Avg Place | 39.19% Win Rate | 4.73% First Place | 0.24% Pick Rate | |||||
4.99 Avg Place | 41.77% Win Rate | 3.80% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | |||||
5.00 Avg Place | 36.23% Win Rate | 4.35% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
5.03 Avg Place | 43.24% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
- | 5.12 Avg Place | 38.97% Win Rate | 6.64% First Place | 2.02% Pick Rate | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 43.75% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.14 Avg Place | 28.57% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
5.17 Avg Place | 27.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.19 Avg Place | 35.90% Win Rate | 5.13% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
5.20 Avg Place | 35.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
5.21 Avg Place | 34.06% Win Rate | 4.74% First Place | 0.88% Pick Rate | |||||
5.21 Avg Place | 26.32% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.37 Avg Place | 30.77% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
5.38 Avg Place | 35.42% Win Rate | 4.17% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
5.42 Avg Place | 30.30% Win Rate | 6.06% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.48 Avg Place | 26.23% Win Rate | 1.64% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
5.50 Avg Place | 27.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.53 Avg Place | 23.26% Win Rate | 2.33% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.71 Avg Place | 29.27% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.71 Avg Place | 29.60% Win Rate | 1.60% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | |||||
5.78 Avg Place | 11.11% Win Rate | 5.56% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.85 Avg Place | 5.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.86 Avg Place | 28.07% Win Rate | 3.51% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.94 Avg Place | 11.11% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
6.00 Avg Place | 5.26% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
6.09 Avg Place | 15.63% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
6.21 Avg Place | 11.65% Win Rate | 2.91% First Place | 0.16% Pick Rate | |||||
6.79 Avg Place | 8.20% Win Rate | 1.64% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
FAQ de Comps TFT Set 16
¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16?
La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16 es Protector/Defensor con Aphelios como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 88.9% y una posición promedio de 2.58. Esta composición es efectiva para subir en clasificatoria y consistentemente queda en el top 4.
¿Cómo juego la composición Protector/Defensor?
Para jugar Protector/Defensor, concéntrate en construir alrededor de Aphelios como tu carry principal. Busca Aphelios y unidades de apoyo temprano, prioriza objetos que tengan sinergia con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, lo que la convierte en una opción relativamente sin competencia.
¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 16?
Para ganancias de LP consistentes en TFT Set 16, Protector/Defensor ofrece la mejor posición promedio en 2.58. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Protector/Defensor (2.60 avg) y Coloso/Disruptor (2.77 avg). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan los finales en bottom 4 y proporcionan un ascenso constante.
¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?
Protector/Defensor es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 88.9% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Poca competencia significa que puedes encontrar tus unidades naturalmente sin tener que forzar pivotes.
¿Cuándo debo forzar una composición vs jugar flexible en TFT Set 16?
En TFT Set 16, Defensor/Yordle tiene una tasa de selección del 2.0%, lo que significa que está muy disputada. Si ves que otros la están jugando, considera flexear hacia alternativas como Protector/Defensor. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos tempranos, o cuando no esté disputada. Flexea cuando veas 2+ jugadores compitiendo por las mismas unidades.
¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más consistente en TFT Set 16?
Protector/Defensor tiene la mejor posición promedio en 2.58, haciéndola la composición más consistente para subir. Protector/Defensor follows at 2.60, y Coloso/Disruptor at 2.77. Una posición promedio más baja significa menos finales en bottom 4.
¿Es la posición promedio mejor que la tasa de victoria para subir?
Para ganancias de LP consistentes, la posición promedio suele ser más confiable que la tasa de victoria pura. Una composición como Protector/Defensor con posición promedio de 2.58 minimiza las grandes pérdidas de LP por quedar en bottom 4. Las composiciones de alta varianza pueden ganar más lobbies pero también quedar octavas más seguido. Para subir, la consistencia suele ganarle a las estrategias arriesgadas.