Obsesión de VarusComps de equipo TFT
Composiciones de equipo usando Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 16.8. Ver comps donde las unidades carry equipan este objeto para máxima efectividad.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Obsesión de Varus as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 44 viable team comps currently building Obsesión de Varus, with an average win rate of 38.07% across all compositions. The highest performing Obsesión de Varus comp achieves a 97.53% win rate, primarily featuring Duelista divino, Viajante, Luchador traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Obsesión de Varus is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.08 Avg Place | 97.53% Top 4 Rate | 36.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.90 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 27.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.00 Avg Place | 82.65% Top 4 Rate | 20.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.53% Top 4 Rate | 24.25% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.57 Avg Place | 70.46% Top 4 Rate | 14.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.58 Avg Place | 70.05% Top 4 Rate | 13.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 69.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.71% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 63.33% Top 4 Rate | 13.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.28 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 8.14% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 53.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.41 Avg Place | 53.44% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 52.98% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.60 Avg Place | 48.27% Top 4 Rate | 6.44% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.52 Avg Place | 47.71% Top 4 Rate | 6.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.83 Avg Place | 42.92% Top 4 Rate | 7.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.75% Top 4 Rate | 6.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.89 Avg Place | 41.57% Top 4 Rate | 6.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.93 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.09 Avg Place | 37.19% Top 4 Rate | 2.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.26 Avg Place | 30.46% Top 4 Rate | 4.60% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.36 Avg Place | 29.49% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 28.82% Top 4 Rate | 2.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 28.80% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.41 Avg Place | 28.65% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 25.23% Top 4 Rate | 3.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.07% Top 4 Rate | 4.27% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.94 Avg Place | 22.67% Top 4 Rate | 1.74% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.62 Avg Place | 22.56% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.74 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.15% Top 4 Rate | 1.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 21.64% Top 4 Rate | 3.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.82 Avg Place | 21.17% Top 4 Rate | 0.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 19.41% Top 4 Rate | 2.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 18.72% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 18.43% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.78% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.61% Top 4 Rate | 1.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 15.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.18 Avg Place | 14.46% Top 4 Rate | 2.07% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.98% Top 4 Rate | 0.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 13.81% Top 4 Rate | 0.62% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.29% Top 4 Rate | 0.63% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.09 Avg Place | 6.99% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested |
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
Comps de equipo Obsesión de Varus - Preguntas frecuentes
¿Cuál es la mejor composición de equipo para Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 17?
La mejor composición de equipo con Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 17 logra una tasa de victoria de 97.53% con una tasa de selección de 0.06%. Esta composición usa rasgos Duelista divino, Viajante, and Luchador y se elige en el 0.06% de las partidas con Obsesión de Varus.
¿Cuántas composiciones de equipo usan Obsesión de Varus en TFT?
Hay 44 composiciones de equipo viables que comúnmente construyen Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 17. Obsesión de Varus aparece en comps con una tasa de victoria promedio de 38.07% en 27,772 partidas totales analizadas.
¿Qué comp usa Obsesión de Varus más a menudo en TFT?
La comp más popular para Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 17 usa los rasgos Contendiente, N.O.V.A., and Luchador con una tasa de selección de 2.02%. Esta composición logra una tasa de victoria de 53.44% y colocación promedio de 4.41.
¿Qué rasgos funcionan bien con Obsesión de Varus en TFT?
Los mejores rasgos que tienen sinergia con Obsesión de Varus en TFT Set 17 son Duelista divino, Viajante, Luchador, Conducto, Mecha, Yelmo sombrío, Dama oscura, and Oráculo. Estas combinaciones de rasgos aparecen en las composiciones de equipo con las tasas de victoria más altas de Obsesión de Varus.