Cinturón de giganteComps de equipo TFT
Composiciones de equipo usando Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 16.9. Ver comps donde las unidades carry equipan este objeto para máxima efectividad.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Cinturón de gigante as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 58 viable team comps currently building Cinturón de gigante, with an average win rate of 40.92% across all compositions. The highest performing Cinturón de gigante comp achieves a 83.71% win rate, primarily featuring Pícaro, N.O.V.A., Tejedestinos traits with Caitlyn as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Cinturón de gigante is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
3.13 Avg Place | 83.71% Top 4 Rate | 11.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 83.08% Top 4 Rate | 23.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.09 Avg Place | 80.14% Top 4 Rate | 24.47% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.33 Avg Place | 78.54% Top 4 Rate | 17.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 76.34% Top 4 Rate | 22.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 74.43% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 74.34% Top 4 Rate | 23.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.43 Avg Place | 68.84% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 67.43% Top 4 Rate | 11.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 67.28% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.79 Avg Place | 64.92% Top 4 Rate | 9.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.17 Avg Place | 61.21% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.76% Top 4 Rate | 9.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.42 Avg Place | 56.12% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.01% Top 4 Rate | 6.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.39 Avg Place | 54.39% Top 4 Rate | 5.10% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.35 Avg Place | 54.23% Top 4 Rate | 2.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.49 Avg Place | 50.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.80% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.49 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 10.50% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 12.59% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.67 Avg Place | 49.16% Top 4 Rate | 7.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.50% Top 4 Rate | 8.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.55 Avg Place | 46.72% Top 4 Rate | 8.03% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.70 Avg Place | 44.96% Top 4 Rate | 7.78% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.95 Avg Place | 43.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.64% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.74 Avg Place | 41.55% Top 4 Rate | 7.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.04 Avg Place | 39.60% Top 4 Rate | 4.19% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.94 Avg Place | 38.82% Top 4 Rate | 4.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 37.54% Top 4 Rate | 4.31% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.98 Avg Place | 37.35% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.20 Avg Place | 34.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.16 Avg Place | 33.98% Top 4 Rate | 4.30% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.39 Avg Place | 31.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.09% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.67 Avg Place | 30.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 29.15% Top 4 Rate | 3.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 29.00% Top 4 Rate | 7.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.44 Avg Place | 28.64% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 28.48% Top 4 Rate | 0.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.47 Avg Place | 27.04% Top 4 Rate | 1.89% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.55 Avg Place | 26.79% Top 4 Rate | 1.79% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 26.64% Top 4 Rate | 1.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.53 Avg Place | 26.62% Top 4 Rate | 1.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 25.68% Top 4 Rate | 2.93% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 22.84% Top 4 Rate | 1.85% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.81 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 1.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.73 Avg Place | 21.19% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 21.05% Top 4 Rate | 4.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.64 Avg Place | 20.73% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 18.91% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.03 Avg Place | 18.59% Top 4 Rate | 1.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.02 Avg Place | 17.09% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.16 Avg Place | 16.31% Top 4 Rate | 1.16% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 15.27% Top 4 Rate | 1.15% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 14.01% Top 4 Rate | 0.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.97 Avg Place | 11.89% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.17 Avg Place | 8.11% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.72 Avg Place | 4.25% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
Comps de equipo Cinturón de gigante - Preguntas frecuentes
¿Cuál es la mejor composición de equipo para Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 17?
La mejor composición de equipo con Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 17 logra una tasa de victoria de 83.71% con una tasa de selección de 0.07%. Esta composición usa rasgos Pícaro, N.O.V.A., and Tejedestinos y se elige en el 0.07% de las partidas con Cinturón de gigante.
¿Cuántas composiciones de equipo usan Cinturón de gigante en TFT?
Hay 58 composiciones de equipo viables que comúnmente construyen Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 17. Cinturón de gigante aparece en comps con una tasa de victoria promedio de 40.92% en 39,710 partidas totales analizadas.
¿Qué comp usa Cinturón de gigante más a menudo en TFT?
La comp más popular para Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 17 usa los rasgos Pícaro, N.O.V.A., and Tejedestinos con una tasa de selección de 1.91%. Esta composición logra una tasa de victoria de 74.43% y colocación promedio de 3.32.
¿Qué comp con Cinturón de gigante tiene la mejor colocación promedio?
La comp de Cinturón de gigante con la mejor colocación promedio logra 2.91 con los rasgos Pícaro, N.O.V.A., and Tejedestinos. Esta composición tiene una tasa de victoria de 83.08% y tasa de selección de 0.22%.
¿Qué rasgos funcionan bien con Cinturón de gigante en TFT?
Los mejores rasgos que tienen sinergia con Cinturón de gigante en TFT Set 17 son Pícaro, N.O.V.A., Tejedestinos, Bastión, Redentor, and Onda espacial. Estas combinaciones de rasgos aparecen en las composiciones de equipo con las tasas de victoria más altas de Cinturón de gigante.