Składy TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate

Ta tabela przedstawia składy drużynowe TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate, pomagając Tobie i Twojemu partnerowi zidentyfikować najskuteczniejsze składy do wspinaczki. Top 9-bohaterowe składy Double Up Set 17: N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg), Rogue (88.6% WR, 2.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler prowadzi z 97.87% win rate i 2.19 średnią pozycją. Replicator podąża z 88.68% win rate. Analiza 88 9-bohaterowych składów Double Up ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.

Zgłoś problem

Składy TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

Jaki jest najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17?

Najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17 to N.O.V.A./Brawler z Viktor jako głównym carry, osiągający 97.9% winrate i 2.19 średnie miejsce. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki z partnerem.

Jak grać skład N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up?

Aby grać N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up, koordynuj się z partnerem. Skup się na budowaniu wokół Viktor jako głównego carry. Ten skład ma 0.1% pickrate, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją. Koordynuj asysty i wspólne przedmioty z partnerem duo.

Jakie składy Double Up są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?

Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce na poziomie 2.19. Inne niezawodne opcje to Replicator/N.O.V.A. (śr. 2.46) i Dark Star/Brawler (śr. 2.52). Koordynujcie się z partnerem aby nie rywalizować o te same jednostki.

Jaki jest najłatwiejszy skład TFT Double Up?

N.O.V.A./Brawler to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 97.9% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.

Czy mój partner duo i ja powinniśmy grać ten sam skład w Double Up?

W TFT Set 17 Double Up zazwyczaj lepiej jest grać różne składy aby uniknąć rywalizacji o jednostki. Challenger/Rogue jest najpopularniejszy z 1.3% pickrate. Rozważ aby Twój partner grał N.O.V.A./Brawler jako opcję uzupełniającą.