Składy TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate
Ta tabela przedstawia składy drużynowe TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate, pomagając Tobie i Twojemu partnerowi zidentyfikować najskuteczniejsze składy do wspinaczki. Top 9-bohaterowe składy Double Up Set 17: N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg), Rogue (88.6% WR, 2.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler prowadzi z 97.87% win rate i 2.19 średnią pozycją. Replicator podąża z 88.68% win rate. Analiza 88 9-bohaterowych składów Double Up ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.19 Avg Place | 97.87% Top 4 Rate | 34.04% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.72 Avg Place | 88.68% Top 4 Rate | 22.64% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.71 Avg Place | 88.61% Top 4 Rate | 24.05% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.46 Avg Place | 87.18% Top 4 Rate | 28.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.80 Avg Place | 83.67% Top 4 Rate | 26.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.83 Avg Place | 82.81% Top 4 Rate | 26.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.80 Avg Place | 63.41% Top 4 Rate | 17.07% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.93 Avg Place | 82.61% Top 4 Rate | 28.26% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.78 Avg Place | 82.42% Top 4 Rate | 26.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 78.57% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.12 Avg Place | 80.23% Top 4 Rate | 20.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 80.00% Top 4 Rate | 23.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.94 Avg Place | 81.48% Top 4 Rate | 22.22% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 81.20% Top 4 Rate | 22.22% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.21 Avg Place | 76.32% Top 4 Rate | 21.05% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.72 Avg Place | 59.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.71% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 73.51% Top 4 Rate | 18.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 76.74% Top 4 Rate | 21.86% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.68 Avg Place | 65.81% Top 4 Rate | 18.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 72.73% Top 4 Rate | 18.18% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.47 Avg Place | 67.94% Top 4 Rate | 23.66% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.21 Avg Place | 71.43% Top 4 Rate | 14.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 82.93% Top 4 Rate | 21.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.63 Avg Place | 63.89% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.59 Avg Place | 64.86% Top 4 Rate | 21.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.81 Avg Place | 59.46% Top 4 Rate | 18.92% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.24 Avg Place | 52.94% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.79 Avg Place | 57.34% Top 4 Rate | 20.63% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 68.61% Top 4 Rate | 23.36% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 87.50% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.59 Avg Place | 68.25% Top 4 Rate | 20.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.61 Avg Place | 66.07% Top 4 Rate | 21.43% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.49 Avg Place | 67.44% Top 4 Rate | 23.26% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.47 Avg Place | 71.88% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 80.73% Top 4 Rate | 22.28% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.59 Avg Place | 64.43% Top 4 Rate | 27.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 62.22% Top 4 Rate | 24.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.98 Avg Place | 59.52% Top 4 Rate | 13.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.04 Avg Place | 54.35% Top 4 Rate | 13.04% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.56 Avg Place | 65.93% Top 4 Rate | 20.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.85 Avg Place | 65.38% Top 4 Rate | 19.23% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 70.37% Top 4 Rate | 20.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.04 Avg Place | 75.94% Top 4 Rate | 21.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 65.00% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.85 Avg Place | 65.00% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.98 Avg Place | 58.49% Top 4 Rate | 16.60% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 64.14% Top 4 Rate | 19.31% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.38 Avg Place | 72.73% Top 4 Rate | 22.73% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.19 Avg Place | 55.93% Top 4 Rate | 15.68% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 57.89% Top 4 Rate | 22.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.53 Avg Place | 71.05% Top 4 Rate | 18.42% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.83 Avg Place | 39.66% Top 4 Rate | 8.62% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 68.10% Top 4 Rate | 27.62% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 71.05% Top 4 Rate | 15.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 53.27% Top 4 Rate | 14.74% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.65 Avg Place | 64.65% Top 4 Rate | 17.32% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.95% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.33 Avg Place | 71.05% Top 4 Rate | 14.04% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.60 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.23 Avg Place | 29.55% Top 4 Rate | 9.09% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.81 Avg Place | 59.74% Top 4 Rate | 12.99% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.63 Avg Place | 59.26% Top 4 Rate | 22.22% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.38 Avg Place | 54.17% Top 4 Rate | 16.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.38 Avg Place | 45.59% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.54 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 8.33% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.06 Avg Place | 58.68% Top 4 Rate | 16.77% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.04 Avg Place | 62.50% Top 4 Rate | 12.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.35 Avg Place | 55.00% Top 4 Rate | 15.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 54.55% Top 4 Rate | 36.36% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.08 Avg Place | 60.27% Top 4 Rate | 15.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.13 Avg Place | 52.08% Top 4 Rate | 14.58% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 50.94% Top 4 Rate | 7.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 57.94% Top 4 Rate | 15.89% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.31 Avg Place | 50.72% Top 4 Rate | 12.92% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.67 Avg Place | 53.85% Top 4 Rate | 2.56% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.97 Avg Place | 59.78% Top 4 Rate | 20.65% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 47.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.84% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.38 Avg Place | 50.85% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.50 Avg Place | 48.80% Top 4 Rate | 13.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 33.33% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.06% Top 4 Rate | 22.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 50.53% Top 4 Rate | 12.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 44.30% Top 4 Rate | 10.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 43.84% Top 4 Rate | 6.85% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 36.96% Top 4 Rate | 8.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.96 Avg Place | 36.97% Top 4 Rate | 11.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.40 Avg Place | 27.27% Top 4 Rate | 9.09% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
6.06 Avg Place | 18.75% Top 4 Rate | 6.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.
Składy TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ
Jaki jest najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17?
Najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17 to N.O.V.A./Brawler z Viktor jako głównym carry, osiągający 97.9% winrate i 2.19 średnie miejsce. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki z partnerem.
Jak grać skład N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up?
Aby grać N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up, koordynuj się z partnerem. Skup się na budowaniu wokół Viktor jako głównego carry. Ten skład ma 0.1% pickrate, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją. Koordynuj asysty i wspólne przedmioty z partnerem duo.
Jakie składy Double Up są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?
Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce na poziomie 2.19. Inne niezawodne opcje to Replicator/N.O.V.A. (śr. 2.46) i Dark Star/Brawler (śr. 2.52). Koordynujcie się z partnerem aby nie rywalizować o te same jednostki.
Jaki jest najłatwiejszy skład TFT Double Up?
N.O.V.A./Brawler to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 97.9% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.
Czy mój partner duo i ja powinniśmy grać ten sam skład w Double Up?
W TFT Set 17 Double Up zazwyczaj lepiej jest grać różne składy aby uniknąć rywalizacji o jednostki. Challenger/Rogue jest najpopularniejszy z 1.3% pickrate. Rozważ aby Twój partner grał N.O.V.A./Brawler jako opcję uzupełniającą.