大和
胜率
52.7%
场次
985
KDA
2.69
玩家伤害
36,269

大和 vs 悖论vs 悖论

技能等级所有技能等级
场次5,894
版本6628
最后更新2026年7月10日

大和 基于 985 场 Deadlock 比赛维持对 悖论 的 52.7% 胜率优势。大和 平均获得 -281 更多的净资产,转化为更早的物品强势期。在经济优势周围玩耍以最大化这个对位。

Metabot 徽标
MetaBot 桌面版
实时游戏内覆盖层
加入我们的 Discord
反馈Bug、功能建议与开发者交流
加入 Discord

大和对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看大和对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
大和 - 52.7% win rate in this matchup
大和
52.7% 胜率
VS
悖论 vs 大和 matchup - 47.5% win rate
悖论
47.5% 胜率

大和 vs 悖论对线谁赢?

大和 wins the 大和 vs 悖论 matchup
获胜者
大和
比赛: 985
52.7%
胜率
47.5%
8.5
场均击杀
5.5
8.0
场均死亡
7.3
13.1
场均助攻
13.5
41,271
场均净资产
41,552
36,269
玩家伤害
33,850
6,653
目标伤害
5,872
82.8
补刀
98.4

大和 vs 悖论 对战摘要

The 大和 vs 悖论 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 985 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 52.7% win rate compared to 悖论's 47.5%, giving 大和 a 5.2 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 悖论 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

大和 vs 悖论 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 大和 vs 悖论 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 985 ranked games reveals 大和 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 大和 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 大和 dominates.

KDA比率
2.69大和
2.60悖论
The KDA comparison between 大和 and 悖论 reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with 大和 averaging 2.69 and 悖论 posting 2.60. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
平均击杀
8.5大和
5.5悖论
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.5 kills compared to 5.5 — a difference of nearly 3.0 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
8.0大和
7.3悖论
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 7.3 times per game compared to 大和's 8.0 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
36,269大和
33,850悖论
大和 applies 2,419 more damage per game than 悖论 in this matchup (36,269 vs 33,850). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 大和 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 悖论 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
6,653大和
5,872悖论
Objective damage contribution is similar between 大和 (6,653) and 悖论 (5,872). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

大和 vs 悖论 经济分析

净资产
41,271大和
41,552悖论
补刀
82.8大和
98.4悖论

大和 and 悖论 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. 悖论 secures more last hits (98.4 vs 82.8), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.6 vs 2.0). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

大和 vs 悖论 推荐装备

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

This winning build for 大和 against 悖论 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 52.7% win rate against 悖论, these 7 items help 大和 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 幸运一击, 聚焦透镜, 疾跑靴, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 19,200 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

悖论's counter-build against 大和 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 悖论 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 元灵压制, 施术之手, 巫师护甲, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 29,600 souls Knowing 悖论's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于985场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对大和对战悖论进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

大和在Deadlock中对22名英雄有利,对15名英雄不利。大和最强对位是西尔芙,胜率57.2%。最难对位是麦金妮,胜率43.5%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

大和 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6628)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
51.80%2,3152.608.48.235,87240,990
47.68%2,0542.478.48.536,09440,048
53.75%1,9652.628.68.337,64341,204
48.55%1,9182.528.38.236,06540,573
52.82%1,8092.548.58.337,11041,333
52.63%1,8032.598.28.136,16341,139
50.06%1,6662.568.58.336,98640,816
52.29%1,6502.648.98.337,12941,277
53.76%1,6142.688.57.936,94641,066
45.67%1,5872.548.68.337,02841,442
47.68%1,4562.568.58.236,80740,551
51.61%1,4442.588.28.035,34540,165
54.27%1,4342.558.48.336,13041,469
49.29%1,2802.538.38.236,18539,864
47.28%1,2692.448.18.234,97341,169
51.23%1,2562.488.48.435,55641,023
47.94%1,2122.488.38.136,88840,886
50.61%1,2092.558.58.236,32440,824
46.89%1,1992.528.28.235,94640,255
47.37%1,1822.508.38.134,69141,369
52.26%1,1672.628.68.235,79541,724
49.70%1,0682.568.38.237,02641,247
47.59%1,0312.548.28.236,76040,854
52.12%1,0132.518.28.236,20340,848
52.72%9852.698.58.036,26941,271
51.41%9532.598.07.735,05740,163
50.00%9392.558.58.436,25641,031
49.82%9312.578.68.437,39041,017
51.08%9262.468.08.336,31641,339
50.24%8822.708.78.237,68342,189
49.59%7762.538.18.135,11140,002
52.80%7742.578.58.135,69240,832
57.20%7622.688.68.237,04141,833
43.48%6822.347.88.335,04641,054
51.97%6172.628.68.135,72841,085
54.50%6022.658.27.936,05441,640
47.38%5922.508.08.137,30640,776

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

大和对位 - 常见问题

大和在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

大和最好的对阵是对抗西尔芙,达到57.2%的胜率。大和通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

大和在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

大和最难的对阵是对抗麦金妮,仅有43.5%的胜率。对抗此对手时,大和应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

大和有多少有利的对阵?

大和在Deadlock中有22个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和15个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩大和?

在大和的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在大和的对阵中关注什么属性?

在大和对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。