大和
胜率
64.9%
场次
61
KDA
3.03
玩家伤害
35,670

大和 vs 悖论vs 悖论

技能等级所有技能等级
场次7,515
版本6487
最后更新2026年5月26日

大和 在 Deadlock 中以出色的 64.9% 胜率压制 悖论。在 61 场游戏中,大和 平均获得 8.2 次击杀和 1,967 额外的玩家伤害每场比赛。这个有利的对位允许激进的玩法和早期战斗机会。

大和 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 大和 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
悖论 - 64.9% win rate悖论(64.9%)
大和 - 64.9% win rate in this matchup
大和
64.9% WR
VS
悖论 vs 大和 matchup - 34.5% win rate
悖论
34.5% WR

Who Wins the 大和 vs 悖论 Matchup?

大和 wins the 大和 vs 悖论 matchup
Winner
大和
Matches: 61
64.9%
Win Rate
34.5%
8.2
Avg Kills
5.4
6.7
Avg Deaths
6.4
12.2
Avg Assists
11.6
41,516
Avg Net Worth
40,608
35,670
Player DMG
33,703
6,903
Objective DMG
4,539
83.9
Last Hits
93.9

大和 vs 悖论 对战摘要

The 大和 vs 悖论 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 61 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 64.9% win rate compared to 悖论's 34.5%, giving 大和 a 30.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

大和 vs 悖论 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 大和 vs 悖论 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 61 ranked games reveals 大和 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 大和 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 大和 dominates.

KDA比率
3.03大和
2.67悖论
大和 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 3.03 compared to 悖论's 2.67. While this 0.36 point difference indicates 大和 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 大和's superior sustain.
平均击杀
8.2大和
5.4悖论
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.2 kills compared to 5.4 — a difference of nearly 2.8 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.7大和
6.4悖论
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.4 times per game compared to 大和's 6.7 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
35,670大和
33,703悖论
大和 applies 1,967 more damage per game than 悖论 in this matchup (35,670 vs 33,703). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 大和 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 悖论 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
6,903大和
4,539悖论
大和 contributes 2,364 more objective damage than 悖论 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 大和 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 悖论 should focus on creating picks while 大和 pushes objectives.

大和 vs 悖论 经济分析

净资产
41,516大和
40,608悖论
补刀
83.9大和
93.9悖论

大和 generates approximately 908 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 大和 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (93.9 vs 83.9), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.8 vs 2.4). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

大和 vs 悖论 推荐装备

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

This winning build for 大和 against 悖论 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 64.9% win rate against 悖论, these 7 items help 大和 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 近战蓄力, 加速回复, 回应射击, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 16,800 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

悖论's counter-build against 大和 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 悖论 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 雷鸣卷轴, 战斗背心, 粉碎护甲, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 18,400 souls Knowing 悖论's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于61场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对大和对战悖论进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

大和在Deadlock中对21名英雄有利,对16名英雄不利。大和最强对位是悖论,胜率64.9%。最难对位是魔液,胜率34.4%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

大和 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
48.39%1372.568.98.042,15342,482
50.89%1162.779.07.340,13540,905
45.28%1102.357.47.834,93839,061
48.04%1072.759.77.942,15241,721
46.15%1062.568.47.638,26640,469
50.00%1042.658.77.940,05341,238
50.00%992.908.97.239,76141,418
51.14%982.498.07.635,73539,340
56.47%953.129.16.738,42640,846
60.98%932.979.47.241,16842,944
47.67%932.719.07.539,47042,616
51.72%922.508.07.337,40039,056
54.43%872.668.88.140,89043,621
42.50%872.547.97.538,99639,845
47.56%873.088.56.738,09840,185
54.55%833.038.46.536,64140,629
47.30%802.498.17.833,90838,608
51.39%792.698.57.437,90639,792
52.86%732.588.47.738,46041,034
56.06%672.747.47.636,31440,468
60.94%672.939.27.437,64341,625
52.38%652.728.47.238,08341,747
55.74%652.908.67.136,86439,535
58.06%652.628.97.639,17241,207
42.37%622.457.77.735,76641,492
64.91%613.038.26.735,67041,516
47.37%602.277.48.740,25643,277
62.50%592.808.97.138,50841,379
54.55%572.668.47.238,67041,121
42.86%532.728.27.341,69339,481
40.43%532.838.66.636,57338,095
53.33%502.737.76.831,71638,421
38.64%492.729.07.840,72240,443
47.50%432.6710.27.442,22742,647
54.05%432.829.57.943,58041,401
37.14%392.316.97.333,98938,011
34.38%353.169.86.842,13641,534

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

大和对位 - 常见问题

大和在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

大和最好的对阵是对抗悖论,达到64.9%的胜率。大和通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

大和在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

大和最难的对阵是对抗魔液,仅有34.4%的胜率。对抗此对手时,大和应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

大和有多少有利的对阵?

大和在Deadlock中有21个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和16个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩大和?

在大和的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在大和的对阵中关注什么属性?

在大和对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。