Best Average Placement TFT Team Compositions
Set 18
This table ranks TFT team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 8-champion Set 18 compositions: Brawler (91.0% WR, 2.2 avg), Brawler (89.3% WR, 2.3 avg), Brawler (86.5% WR, 2.5 avg). Brawler/Invoker leads with 91.03% win rate and 2.20 average placement. Brawler follows at 89.35% win rate. Analyzing 66 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 2.20 | Top 4 91.03% | First Place 41.21% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.32 | Top 4 89.35% | First Place 39.63% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.51 | Top 4 86.49% | First Place 26.32% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.63 | Top 4 84.58% | First Place 30.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.65 | Top 4 85.22% | First Place 31.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.74 | Top 4 82.95% | First Place 30.73% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.84 | Top 4 81.39% | First Place 30.24% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.88 | Top 4 82.02% | First Place 25.60% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.93 | Top 4 80.34% | First Place 25.97% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 80.80% | First Place 22.75% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 75.37% | First Place 22.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 77.43% | First Place 22.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 75.85% | First Place 24.85% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.20 | Top 4 76.88% | First Place 15.45% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.22 | Top 4 74.53% | First Place 23.14% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.33 | Top 4 75.50% | First Place 13.57% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.37 | Top 4 70.60% | First Place 20.37% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.40 | Top 4 74.15% | First Place 15.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.41 | Top 4 70.76% | First Place 18.53% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 71.86% | First Place 14.70% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 66.70% | First Place 30.31% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 72.02% | First Place 15.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 67.96% | First Place 18.35% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 73.22% | First Place 12.29% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 70.92% | First Place 9.91% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 69.02% | First Place 19.63% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 66.01% | First Place 14.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.67 | Top 4 67.59% | First Place 8.55% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 68.96% | First Place 10.26% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.69 | Top 4 69.88% | First Place 8.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.70 | Top 4 65.94% | First Place 15.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.71 | Top 4 66.67% | First Place 14.70% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 65.69% | First Place 13.99% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.82 | Top 4 63.26% | First Place 7.34% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.82 | Top 4 65.53% | First Place 10.19% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.88 | Top 4 62.14% | First Place 14.51% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.91 | Top 4 61.98% | First Place 14.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.27 | Top 4 54.99% | First Place 6.63% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.31 | Top 4 54.94% | First Place 7.50% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.35 | Top 4 53.93% | First Place 6.96% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.38 | Top 4 52.39% | First Place 7.74% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 50.04% | First Place 5.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 47.58% | First Place 4.01% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 46.36% | First Place 5.83% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.68 | Top 4 45.34% | First Place 5.74% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.69 | Top 4 46.62% | First Place 5.46% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.74 | Top 4 42.57% | First Place 6.50% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 43.47% | First Place 6.46% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 44.90% | First Place 6.40% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.79 | Top 4 45.68% | First Place 3.47% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.86 | Top 4 41.84% | First Place 6.48% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.90 | Top 4 41.03% | First Place 6.24% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.96 | Top 4 43.46% | First Place 5.21% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.03 | Top 4 38.50% | First Place 5.09% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.03 | Top 4 38.78% | First Place 2.99% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.23 | Top 4 35.33% | First Place 3.38% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.26 | Top 4 36.16% | First Place 3.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.30 | Top 4 33.91% | First Place 3.69% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.41 | Top 4 32.35% | First Place 3.00% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.42 | Top 4 30.68% | First Place 2.49% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.46 | Top 4 30.93% | First Place 1.96% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.50 | Top 4 31.77% | First Place 4.09% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.52 | Top 4 29.19% | First Place 4.06% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.54 | Top 4 29.03% | First Place 2.33% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.91 | Top 4 20.98% | First Place 1.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.07 | Top 4 20.16% | First Place 1.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 18 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 18?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 18 is Brawler/Invoker with Pebbles as the primary carry, achieving a 91.0% win rate and 2.20 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Brawler/Invoker comp?
To play Brawler/Invoker, focus on building around Pebbles as your main carry. Look for Pebbles and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.2% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 18?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 18, Brawler/Invoker offers the best average placement at 2.20. Other reliable options include Brawler/Invoker (2.32 avg) and Brawler/Invoker (2.51 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Brawler/Invoker is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 91.0% win rate but only 0.2% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 18?
In TFT Set 18, Adaptor/Inferno has a 2.7% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Brawler/Invoker. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 18?
Brawler/Invoker has the best average placement at 2.20, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Brawler/Invoker follows at 2.32, and Brawler/Invoker at 2.51. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Brawler/Invoker with 2.20 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.