Best Average Placement TFT Team Compositions
This table ranks TFT team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 8-champion Set 16 compositions: Caretaker (87.1% WR, 2.6 avg), Bruiser (88.2% WR, 2.9 avg), Bruiser (78.4% WR, 2.9 avg). Caretaker/Defender leads with 87.05% win rate and 2.58 average placement. Bruiser follows at 88.24% win rate. Analyzing 70 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Traits | Avg | Win | First | Pick | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.58 Avg Place | 87.05% Win Rate | 25.90% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | |||||
2.87 Avg Place | 88.24% Win Rate | 22.06% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
2.95 Avg Place | 78.45% Win Rate | 27.59% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | |||||
2.95 Avg Place | 79.46% Win Rate | 26.49% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | |||||
3.02 Avg Place | 79.15% Win Rate | 23.99% First Place | 0.59% Pick Rate | |||||
3.16 Avg Place | 80.04% Win Rate | 19.55% First Place | 0.53% Pick Rate | |||||
3.22 Avg Place | 65.75% Win Rate | 35.62% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.23 Avg Place | 76.81% Win Rate | 17.39% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.37% Win Rate | 15.75% First Place | 0.32% Pick Rate | |||||
3.43 Avg Place | 71.67% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
3.44 Avg Place | 72.88% Win Rate | 17.51% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
3.52 Avg Place | 68.12% Win Rate | 26.09% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.56 Avg Place | 70.74% Win Rate | 15.93% First Place | 0.29% Pick Rate | |||||
3.62 Avg Place | 68.09% Win Rate | 10.64% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
3.65 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 19.72% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.68 Avg Place | 69.95% Win Rate | 11.40% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
3.92 Avg Place | 59.06% Win Rate | 14.04% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
4.17 Avg Place | 62.07% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.18 Avg Place | 52.00% Win Rate | 18.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.20 Avg Place | 52.14% Win Rate | 17.09% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | |||||
4.25 Avg Place | 50.91% Win Rate | 9.09% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.28 Avg Place | 58.23% Win Rate | 8.23% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
4.33 Avg Place | 46.15% Win Rate | 3.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.35 Avg Place | 51.06% Win Rate | 13.83% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
4.40 Avg Place | 48.33% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
4.44 Avg Place | 50.55% Win Rate | 8.79% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | |||||
4.46 Avg Place | 41.79% Win Rate | 12.69% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | |||||
4.48 Avg Place | 47.83% Win Rate | 10.87% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.48 Avg Place | 51.58% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
4.52 Avg Place | 46.18% Win Rate | 14.37% First Place | 0.36% Pick Rate | |||||
4.52 Avg Place | 50.00% Win Rate | 13.04% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.54 Avg Place | 48.72% Win Rate | 7.18% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
4.61 Avg Place | 54.10% Win Rate | 6.56% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
4.62 Avg Place | 39.62% Win Rate | 13.21% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
4.63 Avg Place | 41.30% Win Rate | 6.52% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.64 Avg Place | 46.12% Win Rate | 8.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | |||||
4.65 Avg Place | 45.35% Win Rate | 8.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.69 Avg Place | 41.51% Win Rate | 6.60% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
4.76 Avg Place | 41.84% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.27% Win Rate | 3.73% First Place | 0.35% Pick Rate | |||||
4.82 Avg Place | 47.62% Win Rate | 7.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.83 Avg Place | 43.41% Win Rate | 5.85% First Place | 0.22% Pick Rate | |||||
4.87 Avg Place | 35.19% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
- | 4.91 Avg Place | 42.67% Win Rate | 7.41% First Place | 2.06% Pick Rate | ||||
4.95 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 2.50% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.00 Avg Place | 28.57% Win Rate | 12.24% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.01 Avg Place | 34.82% Win Rate | 4.46% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
5.11 Avg Place | 37.04% Win Rate | 1.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.15 Avg Place | 40.57% Win Rate | 1.42% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | |||||
5.16 Avg Place | 40.71% Win Rate | 2.65% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
5.22 Avg Place | 30.43% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.22 Avg Place | 34.21% Win Rate | 2.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | |||||
5.23 Avg Place | 30.81% Win Rate | 4.07% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
5.24 Avg Place | 32.35% Win Rate | 8.82% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.26 Avg Place | 35.72% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.90% Pick Rate | |||||
5.27 Avg Place | 34.11% Win Rate | 0.78% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | |||||
5.45 Avg Place | 23.44% Win Rate | 4.69% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.51 Avg Place | 28.30% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.52 Avg Place | 24.84% Win Rate | 3.27% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
5.53 Avg Place | 26.32% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.61 Avg Place | 21.43% Win Rate | 8.93% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.64 Avg Place | 24.14% Win Rate | 3.45% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.69 Avg Place | 22.99% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.69 Avg Place | 20.41% Win Rate | 4.08% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.95 Avg Place | 20.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
5.99 Avg Place | 18.07% Win Rate | 3.01% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | |||||
6.04 Avg Place | 16.98% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
6.11 Avg Place | 19.64% Win Rate | 1.79% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
6.52 Avg Place | 3.85% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
6.57 Avg Place | 13.85% Win Rate | 1.54% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 16 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Bruiser/Caretaker with Bard as the primary carry, achieving a 88.2% win rate and 2.87 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Bruiser/Caretaker comp?
To play Bruiser/Caretaker, focus on building around Bard as your main carry. Look for Bard and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Caretaker/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.58. Other reliable options include Bruiser/Caretaker (2.87 avg) and Bruiser/Caretaker (2.95 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bruiser/Caretaker is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 88.2% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16, Defender/Yordle has a 2.1% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bruiser/Caretaker. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
Caretaker/Defender has the best average placement at 2.58, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Bruiser/Caretaker follows at 2.87, and Bruiser/Caretaker at 2.95. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Caretaker/Defender with 2.58 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.