Highest Win Rate TFT Team Compositions
This table showcases the TFT team compositions with the highest win rates, helping you identify the most successful comps for climbing ranked. Top 9-champion Set 17 compositions: Party Animal (100.0% WR, 1.4 avg), Replicator (95.5% WR, 2.0 avg), Challenger (93.7% WR, 2.4 avg). Party Animal/Eradicator leads with 100.00% win rate and 1.38 average placement. Replicator follows at 95.49% win rate. Analyzing 64 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.38 | 100.00% | 70.83% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.00 | 95.49% | 42.75% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.37 | 93.68% | 26.97% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.44 | 93.66% | 22.26% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.51 | 93.17% | 23.69% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.51 | 92.98% | 19.10% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.20 | 91.47% | 42.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.58 | 91.28% | 20.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.17 | 91.21% | 45.23% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.36 | 90.73% | 32.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.40 | 90.03% | 33.76% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.41 | 89.80% | 38.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.60 | 89.55% | 24.74% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.54 | 88.27% | 31.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.38 | 87.89% | 34.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.60 | 86.52% | 31.56% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.47 | 86.51% | 28.37% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.90 | 85.54% | 23.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.50 | 84.87% | 34.36% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.74 | 83.79% | 28.68% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.79 | 83.76% | 28.63% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.80 | 82.22% | 30.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.84 | 81.29% | 23.81% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.89 | 80.92% | 28.13% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.76 | 80.67% | 29.33% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
2.91 | 80.34% | 29.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.20 | 79.54% | 15.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.00 | 79.09% | 25.55% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.18 | 78.36% | 19.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.25 | 75.25% | 17.82% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.36 | 74.92% | 15.99% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.37 | 74.89% | 15.91% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.32 | 74.86% | 20.00% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.51 | 73.65% | 16.71% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.25 | 73.52% | 24.04% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.30 | 73.50% | 24.18% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.21 | 73.12% | 22.51% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.54 | 72.91% | 13.10% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.45 | 71.83% | 17.61% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.59 | 71.07% | 10.41% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.35 | 70.55% | 23.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.57 | 70.00% | 12.70% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.59 | 69.90% | 9.90% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.52 | 69.71% | 15.42% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.47 | 69.38% | 25.93% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.69 | 68.61% | 15.28% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.60 | 68.60% | 11.80% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.63 | 68.06% | 17.21% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.65 | 67.67% | 12.63% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.56 | 66.98% | 24.84% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.82 | 64.82% | 9.77% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.00 | 64.35% | 10.31% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.85 | 63.99% | 14.02% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.84 | 60.57% | 24.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.94 | 58.70% | 19.20% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
3.89 | 58.62% | 23.08% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.18 | 56.43% | 15.15% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.56 | 50.34% | 6.21% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.50 | 48.46% | 8.35% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
4.72 | 45.74% | 6.26% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.13 | 36.25% | 1.94% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.35 | 30.32% | 1.21% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.37 | 28.61% | 2.89% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
5.62 | 25.88% | 0.96% | Low Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is Party Animal/Eradicator with Samira as the primary carry, achieving a 100.0% win rate and 1.38 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Party Animal/Eradicator comp?
To play Party Animal/Eradicator, focus on building around Samira as your main carry. Look for Samira and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, Party Animal/Eradicator offers the best average placement at 1.38. Other reliable options include Replicator/N.O.V.A. (2.00 avg) and Dark Star/Brawler (2.17 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Party Animal/Eradicator is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 100.0% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17, Party Animal/N.O.V.A. has a 1.2% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Party Animal/Eradicator. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
Which comps have the highest win rates in TFT Set 17?
The top 3 win rate comps are: 1) Party Animal/Eradicator (100.0%), 2) Replicator/N.O.V.A. (95.5%), and 3) Challenger/N.O.V.A. (93.7%). These represent the strongest compositions for maximizing LP in ranked games.
Why does win rate matter for TFT comps?
Win rate shows how often a composition achieves top 4 placement, which gains LP in ranked. High win rate comps like Party Animal/Eradicator (100.0%) consistently perform well across many games. However, also consider pick rate—heavily contested comps may underperform in your games if multiple players force them.