Fizzvs Lucian
Fizz vs Lucian is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Lucian based on 6 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Lucian scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Lucian matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Lucian(50.0%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Lucian Matchup?
Fizz vs Lucian Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Lucian matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Lucian's 50.0%, giving Fizz a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Lucian outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Lucian reaches their power spikes, while Lucian should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Fizz leads by 0.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Lucian's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Lucian Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Lucian, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Lucian
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Lucian, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Lucian are Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Lucian matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz100.0%Lucian0.0%Fizz25.0%Lucian75.0%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Lucian. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Lucian is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Lucian, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lucian reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lucian survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Lucian
Domination
Precision
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Fizz maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Lucian.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.85% | 386 | 5.9 | 812 | 12,242 | 53.1% | 52.7% | |
| 53.85% | 325 | 6.1 | 829 | 12,826 | 51.5% | 55.4% | |
| 51.66% | 302 | 5.9 | 892 | 12,636 | 48.1% | 54.4% | |
| 53.70% | 270 | 6.0 | 868 | 12,505 | 48.7% | 57.6% | |
| 54.26% | 258 | 5.9 | 834 | 12,546 | 54.2% | 54.3% | |
| 50.23% | 219 | 5.6 | 819 | 11,656 | 48.1% | 52.2% | |
| 53.11% | 209 | 6.0 | 887 | 12,302 | 49.5% | 56.5% | |
| 55.29% | 208 | 6.0 | 949 | 12,089 | 57.0% | 53.7% | |
| 53.17% | 205 | 5.8 | 860 | 13,312 | 55.7% | 51.9% | |
| 52.45% | 204 | 5.6 | 854 | 12,043 | 53.4% | 51.5% | |
| 50.26% | 195 | 5.9 | 834 | 12,776 | 52.1% | 49.2% | |
| 53.16% | 190 | 5.7 | 794 | 12,546 | 52.9% | 53.3% | |
| 54.79% | 188 | 5.2 | 867 | 13,117 | 53.3% | 55.9% | |
| 55.91% | 186 | 5.9 | 742 | 11,540 | 56.8% | 55.0% | |
| 43.45% | 168 | 5.9 | 810 | 12,205 | 51.3% | 37.0% | |
| 50.00% | 154 | 5.5 | 759 | 11,966 | 50.8% | 49.5% | |
| 49.67% | 151 | 5.7 | 859 | 13,049 | 45.0% | 52.8% | |
| 50.36% | 137 | 5.5 | 879 | 12,780 | 45.5% | 53.7% | |
| 44.72% | 123 | 5.8 | 903 | 11,904 | 48.0% | 42.5% | |
| 57.14% | 119 | 5.7 | 797 | 12,048 | 52.8% | 60.6% | |
| 57.39% | 115 | 6.3 | 894 | 13,169 | 56.3% | 58.2% | |
| 54.46% | 112 | 5.7 | 803 | 12,582 | 56.5% | 53.0% | |
| 50.49% | 103 | 5.9 | 891 | 13,492 | 51.4% | 50.0% | |
| 64.08% | 103 | 6.4 | 874 | 12,691 | 66.0% | 62.3% | |
| 53.47% | 101 | 6.1 | 871 | 12,186 | 60.9% | 47.3% | |
| 54.64% | 97 | 5.9 | 854 | 12,208 | 66.0% | 44.0% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 5.4 | 862 | 12,867 | 43.6% | 52.8% | |
| 63.64% | 88 | 5.6 | 832 | 12,847 | 82.3% | 51.9% | |
| 51.16% | 86 | 6.1 | 857 | 12,350 | 53.5% | 48.8% | |
| 50.59% | 85 | 5.7 | 832 | 12,674 | 44.1% | 54.9% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.0 | 918 | 12,753 | 54.3% | 49.0% | |
| 60.00% | 80 | 5.8 | 869 | 13,015 | 61.5% | 59.3% | |
| 49.37% | 79 | 6.2 | 924 | 12,882 | 58.8% | 42.2% | |
| 48.05% | 77 | 5.3 | 850 | 12,439 | 51.6% | 45.6% | |
| 45.33% | 75 | 5.0 | 788 | 12,787 | 46.7% | 44.4% | |
| 61.33% | 75 | 5.1 | 827 | 13,412 | 58.1% | 63.6% | |
| 50.72% | 69 | 5.9 | 890 | 12,300 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 49.18% | 61 | 6.1 | 893 | 12,361 | 50.0% | 48.3% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 6.0 | 818 | 12,324 | 57.7% | 53.6% | |
| 76.09% | 46 | 5.6 | 953 | 12,891 | 83.3% | 68.2% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.3 | 860 | 10,884 | 50.0% | 52.4% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 5.5 | 903 | 14,886 | 72.7% | 52.9% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 5.7 | 868 | 11,116 | 43.8% | 44.4% | |
| 76.19% | 42 | 1.7 | 830 | 13,203 | 83.3% | 70.8% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 5.5 | 858 | 13,154 | 56.3% | 52.0% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 5.3 | 910 | 12,682 | 57.9% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 39 | 6.3 | 881 | 12,465 | 56.3% | 65.2% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 5.3 | 789 | 13,404 | 57.1% | 53.1% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.4 | 731 | 12,382 | 47.6% | 58.8% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 2.6 | 740 | 12,153 | 45.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 1.6 | 707 | 11,804 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 5.5 | 850 | 12,502 | 53.3% | 40.0% | |
| 71.88% | 32 | 1.4 | 723 | 12,860 | 73.3% | 70.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.2 | 920 | 14,232 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.0 | 929 | 13,255 | 58.3% | 55.0% | |
| 65.52% | 29 | 5.8 | 784 | 13,599 | 75.0% | 61.9% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 2.5 | 769 | 13,395 | 25.0% | 70.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.0 | 889 | 12,264 | 66.7% | 46.1% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 4.5 | 855 | 13,024 | 61.1% | 88.9% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 5.4 | 797 | 11,688 | 69.2% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 1.4 | 618 | 12,238 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 2.1 | 671 | 13,978 | 57.1% | 52.6% | |
| 32.00% | 25 | 5.5 | 869 | 11,260 | 23.1% | 41.7% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.3 | 711 | 13,009 | 40.0% | 38.5% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.9 | 848 | 12,508 | 70.0% | 61.5% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.3 | 899 | 12,785 | 77.8% | 21.4% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.3 | 938 | 14,110 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 5.0 | 724 | 10,974 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 76.19% | 21 | 5.6 | 869 | 12,119 | 80.0% | 72.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.7 | 733 | 11,071 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.0 | 736 | 11,318 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 713 | 12,359 | 72.7% | 55.6% | |
| 25.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 843 | 15,777 | 20.0% | 26.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.4 | 800 | 14,174 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.3 | 737 | 12,868 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.5 | 905 | 11,670 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.5 | 839 | 13,102 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 2.5 | 806 | 13,312 | 55.6% | 37.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.8 | 987 | 15,376 | 80.0% | 63.6% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 5.6 | 924 | 11,219 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.8 | 761 | 10,950 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.2 | 584 | 12,062 | 71.4% | 37.5% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 0.9 | 697 | 13,010 | 75.0% | 36.4% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.3 | 833 | 11,555 | 44.4% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 779 | 13,472 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 4.3 | 976 | 11,620 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 4.7 | 779 | 12,686 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.8 | 965 | 13,102 | 60.0% | 77.8% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.9 | 571 | 11,123 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.3 | 843 | 14,347 | 33.3% | 63.6% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 4.5 | 749 | 11,463 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.7 | 773 | 10,629 | 16.7% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.2 | 960 | 12,813 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 2.9 | 772 | 12,792 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 2.3 | 887 | 13,863 | 42.9% | 83.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 675 | 12,191 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.4 | 698 | 15,072 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.1 | 661 | 10,607 | 44.4% | 0.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 795 | 11,486 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.0 | 632 | 12,852 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.9 | 917 | 14,032 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 704 | 13,191 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.0 | 846 | 11,292 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 1.3 | 843 | 15,990 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,802 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 3.5 | 658 | 11,703 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 757 | 13,348 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 793 | 13,266 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.5 | 862 | 13,287 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.8 | 855 | 13,276 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.7 | 969 | 10,386 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 739 | 11,267 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.8 | 568 | 9,175 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.8 | 756 | 12,867 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 725 | 9,241 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 690 | 13,251 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.7 | 850 | 11,019 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 692 | 11,003 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.0 | 870 | 15,216 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.7 | 780 | 14,023 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.2 | 681 | 13,694 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 716 | 10,983 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 923 | 16,620 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 835 | 14,262 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 767 | 10,079 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 571 | 9,757 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 1,017 | 11,604 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 976 | 15,474 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 914 | 14,330 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 1,073 | 18,600 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 1,007 | 13,168 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 813 | 10,695 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 524 | 13,547 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 887 | 12,108 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 679 | 13,904 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 686 | 7,605 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Lucian - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Lucian in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Lucian matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Lucian's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Fizz do against Lucian in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Lucian with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Lucian in the late game?
In the late game, Lucian takes over the Fizz vs Lucian matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Lucian scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Lucian matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Lucian with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Fizz is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Lucian?
The best Fizz build against Lucian includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff, Lich Bane with Crimson Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Lucian?
The best Fizz runes against Lucian use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Lucian matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Lucian?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Lucian with a 50.0% win rate. Fizz slightly edges out Lucian in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Fizz against Lucian?
When playing Fizz against Lucian, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.