Fizzvs Cassiopeia
Fizz vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Fizz wins with a 63.6% win rate (+27.3%) over Cassiopeia based on 11 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Fizz vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 11 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 63.6% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 36.4%, giving Fizz a 27.3 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Cassiopeia
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Cassiopeia are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz80.0%
Cassiopeia20.0%Fizz50.0%Cassiopeia50.0%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 80.0% win rate — a 60.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Fizz at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Cassiopeia. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fizz Runes Against Cassiopeia
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 174 | 5.6 | 894 | 12,310 | 42.7% | 55.6% | |
| 52.53% | 158 | 5.8 | 833 | 11,693 | 58.3% | 47.7% | |
| 50.34% | 147 | 5.6 | 855 | 12,381 | 58.8% | 45.8% | |
| 46.76% | 139 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,556 | 51.0% | 44.3% | |
| 51.11% | 135 | 5.7 | 905 | 12,800 | 58.8% | 46.4% | |
| 54.55% | 132 | 5.3 | 880 | 11,701 | 46.7% | 61.1% | |
| 52.10% | 119 | 5.8 | 979 | 12,226 | 50.0% | 54.0% | |
| 52.63% | 114 | 5.6 | 842 | 11,622 | 44.9% | 58.5% | |
| 48.62% | 109 | 5.8 | 707 | 10,894 | 46.5% | 51.0% | |
| 56.48% | 108 | 5.6 | 875 | 13,214 | 51.4% | 58.9% | |
| 41.35% | 104 | 5.7 | 789 | 12,479 | 39.5% | 42.6% | |
| 57.58% | 99 | 5.6 | 765 | 11,890 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 6.1 | 857 | 13,053 | 51.5% | 54.5% | |
| 56.47% | 85 | 4.9 | 966 | 12,611 | 50.0% | 60.8% | |
| 45.12% | 82 | 5.7 | 821 | 12,049 | 36.7% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 75 | 5.7 | 814 | 11,898 | 50.0% | 55.8% | |
| 47.95% | 73 | 6.0 | 852 | 11,153 | 39.4% | 55.0% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 5.8 | 860 | 12,789 | 50.0% | 53.5% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 5.3 | 828 | 11,981 | 42.3% | 54.0% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 5.8 | 897 | 12,645 | 45.8% | 60.5% | |
| 58.18% | 55 | 5.3 | 926 | 12,424 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 61.54% | 52 | 6.0 | 775 | 10,761 | 64.3% | 58.3% | |
| 63.27% | 49 | 5.3 | 829 | 12,043 | 60.0% | 65.5% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 5.6 | 913 | 12,116 | 58.8% | 46.1% | |
| 42.86% | 42 | 6.0 | 849 | 11,331 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 6.1 | 883 | 12,171 | 52.4% | 52.6% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.0 | 764 | 12,460 | 9.1% | 56.5% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 5.7 | 937 | 13,242 | 72.7% | 54.5% | |
| 77.42% | 31 | 6.2 | 974 | 12,603 | 81.8% | 75.0% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 5.6 | 883 | 10,888 | 71.4% | 57.1% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.9 | 897 | 12,018 | 54.5% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.7 | 746 | 12,622 | 45.5% | 58.8% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 5.4 | 805 | 11,996 | 53.9% | 78.6% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.1 | 818 | 12,416 | 55.6% | 55.6% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 5.5 | 976 | 12,465 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 5.0 | 931 | 13,621 | 85.7% | 52.9% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 5.8 | 904 | 10,731 | 50.0% | 23.1% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 5.4 | 845 | 10,938 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.6 | 826 | 12,420 | 40.0% | 46.1% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 932 | 11,388 | 60.0% | 70.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 845 | 11,794 | 77.8% | 44.4% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.0 | 858 | 13,268 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 5.1 | 737 | 10,379 | 75.0% | 55.6% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.5 | 814 | 13,127 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 4.4 | 808 | 12,386 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.7 | 818 | 11,675 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 4.7 | 688 | 12,326 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.3 | 744 | 12,124 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.1 | 687 | 12,069 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.6 | 822 | 13,784 | 0.0% | 36.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.6 | 819 | 12,687 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.9 | 785 | 13,038 | 71.4% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.4 | 894 | 14,526 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.4 | 634 | 11,523 | 71.4% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.7 | 768 | 11,054 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.0 | 690 | 11,746 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.5 | 827 | 13,538 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.6 | 714 | 11,522 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.3 | 739 | 12,094 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.5 | 821 | 12,003 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 717 | 10,367 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 661 | 9,851 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.7 | 637 | 12,233 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 1,091 | 16,702 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 935 | 13,681 | 100.0% | 44.4% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.7 | 717 | 12,264 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.5 | 774 | 12,891 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 854 | 15,288 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 877 | 14,760 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.3 | 729 | 10,860 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.6 | 730 | 14,504 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 825 | 8,935 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 777 | 10,044 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.1 | 593 | 8,677 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.6 | 892 | 10,868 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.8 | 1,003 | 13,568 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.5 | 950 | 11,362 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.5 | 953 | 8,436 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 914 | 14,343 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 979 | 15,836 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 1,179 | 12,356 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 7 | 5.1 | 766 | 12,249 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 0.9 | 655 | 10,675 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 669 | 11,499 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 614 | 8,650 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.8 | 586 | 11,096 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 760 | 11,710 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 907 | 12,472 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 642 | 9,069 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 888 | 8,831 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 864 | 11,418 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 766 | 12,224 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 971 | 11,166 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 598 | 11,392 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 687 | 11,148 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 710 | 13,839 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 879 | 14,196 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 670 | 10,708 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 634 | 11,419 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 789 | 11,540 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 702 | 11,505 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 808 | 9,831 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 63.6% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 36.4%, a 27.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 11 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Fizz do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 80.0% win rate versus 20.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 63.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 27.3 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 11 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Cassiopeia?
The best Fizz build against Cassiopeia includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Fizz runes against Cassiopeia use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 63.6% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Fizz against Cassiopeia?
When playing Fizz against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.