
Shaco vs Elise is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.17. Shaco wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Elise based on 10 games. Elise wins the early laning phase while Shaco scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Elise matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Shaco vs Elise matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 10 recent matches analyzed, Shaco wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Elise's 50.0%, giving Shaco a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Elise controls the early laning stage, but Shaco outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Elise needs to press advantages before Shaco reaches their power spikes, while Shaco should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Elise leads by 242 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Shaco has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Elise's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Elise is favored during the laning phase against Shaco, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Elise holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Elise, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Elise are Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector and Lord Dominik's Regards. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Elise. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Elise matchup.
Elise dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Shaco. This lopsided early game means Elise can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Shaco is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Elise. Extended games heavily favor Shaco, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Elise must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Shaco reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Shaco survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Shaco maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Elise.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.17. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.11% | 112 | 0.8 | 699 | 13,115 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 43.88% | 98 | 0.9 | 733 | 13,347 | 40.6% | 45.5% | |
| 50.57% | 87 | 0.8 | 720 | 12,795 | 42.9% | 54.2% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 0.9 | 730 | 13,141 | 60.7% | 45.1% | |
| 45.45% | 77 | 0.9 | 719 | 13,156 | 38.5% | 49.0% | |
| 47.37% | 76 | 0.9 | 714 | 12,316 | 46.4% | 47.9% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 0.9 | 642 | 13,025 | 57.1% | 52.1% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 0.7 | 658 | 12,127 | 38.5% | 51.2% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 0.8 | 762 | 12,011 | 44.1% | 72.7% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 1.0 | 829 | 13,661 | 59.1% | 51.4% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 0.8 | 715 | 11,770 | 69.6% | 58.3% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 0.8 | 735 | 13,597 | 46.1% | 46.4% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 0.8 | 752 | 12,696 | 41.2% | 43.5% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 0.8 | 780 | 13,227 | 46.7% | 54.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 0.8 | 660 | 11,973 | 70.0% | 42.1% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 0.9 | 747 | 13,225 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 0.8 | 799 | 12,249 | 27.8% | 42.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 0.9 | 683 | 13,219 | 53.3% | 39.1% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 0.8 | 712 | 12,545 | 37.5% | 59.1% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 0.8 | 645 | 12,541 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 0.8 | 731 | 12,325 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 1.8 | 628 | 8,901 | 41.2% | 40.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 0.8 | 661 | 10,954 | 47.1% | 40.0% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 0.9 | 687 | 12,950 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 0.9 | 778 | 13,504 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 0.7 | 629 | 12,404 | 35.7% | 35.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.4 | 733 | 11,365 | 50.0% | 34.8% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 0.8 | 673 | 12,052 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 1.0 | 656 | 12,212 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 0.8 | 771 | 11,590 | 46.7% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.7 | 623 | 11,686 | 41.7% | 66.7% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 0.9 | 790 | 13,680 | 50.0% | 29.4% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 767 | 13,664 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 0.8 | 640 | 12,332 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 0.8 | 645 | 12,070 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.4 | 719 | 10,442 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.4 | 672 | 10,119 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 76.19% | 21 | 1.5 | 761 | 10,511 | 85.7% | 71.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.4 | 847 | 12,072 | 75.0% | 30.8% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 0.8 | 688 | 13,452 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 621 | 10,801 | 28.6% | 30.8% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 784 | 9,748 | 71.4% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.3 | 646 | 12,111 | 54.5% | 66.7% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 0.8 | 662 | 11,325 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.8 | 756 | 12,771 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 0.8 | 571 | 11,291 | 85.7% | 30.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.2 | 686 | 13,965 | 80.0% | 58.3% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.6 | 686 | 9,224 | 22.2% | 62.5% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.2 | 782 | 13,774 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.0 | 698 | 13,946 | 20.0% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.0 | 612 | 11,534 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.4 | 734 | 8,978 | 30.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 0.8 | 711 | 14,054 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 825 | 12,487 | 85.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 0.8 | 741 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 702 | 11,951 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.4 | 758 | 10,317 | 16.7% | 37.5% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.0 | 779 | 14,672 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.5 | 788 | 8,801 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.7 | 807 | 9,704 | 28.6% | 80.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 724 | 13,182 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 823 | 13,526 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 0.8 | 777 | 14,569 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.6 | 697 | 9,776 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.9 | 760 | 13,069 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 650 | 11,921 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.8 | 646 | 11,106 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 721 | 9,278 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 0.8 | 702 | 13,012 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 794 | 12,139 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.8 | 780 | 8,599 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.4 | 835 | 10,547 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 872 | 11,440 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.2 | 918 | 13,344 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 1.1 | 597 | 7,819 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 662 | 11,962 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.9 | 735 | 10,740 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 799 | 9,822 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 710 | 11,701 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 595 | 9,345 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 770 | 11,415 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 748 | 11,396 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 700 | 8,905 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.0 | 550 | 8,371 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.3 | 979 | 11,673 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 1,094 | 11,590 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 666 | 8,827 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.5 | 693 | 10,215 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.1 | 742 | 9,762 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 532 | 8,729 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 695 | 9,574 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.2 | 739 | 12,839 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.2 | 741 | 16,400 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 614 | 8,433 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 626 | 8,958 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 542 | 9,832 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.6 | 716 | 12,659 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 890 | 12,384 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 637 | 14,188 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 488 | 11,253 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 924 | 10,719 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco wins the Shaco vs Elise matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Elise's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 10 recent ranked games in patch 26.17.
In the early game, Elise has the advantage against Shaco with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Elise players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Shaco takes over the Shaco vs Elise matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Shaco scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Shaco wins the matchup against Elise with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.17. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Shaco is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 10 games analyzed.
The best Shaco build against Elise includes Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector, Lord Dominik's Regards with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Shaco runes against Elise use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Elise matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Yes, Shaco has a favorable matchup against Elise with a 50.0% win rate. Shaco slightly edges out Elise in lane based on current patch 26.17 data.
When playing Shaco against Elise, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Elise. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.