Shacovs Renata Glasc
Shaco vs Renata Glasc is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Shaco wins with a 100.0% win rate (+100.0%) over Renata Glasc based on 5 games. Shaco holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup.
Shaco Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Renata Glasc(100.0%)Who Wins the Shaco vs Renata Glasc Matchup?
Shaco vs Renata Glasc Matchup Summary
The Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Shaco wins with a 100.0% win rate compared to Renata Glasc's 0.0%, giving Shaco a 100.0 percentage point advantage. Shaco dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Renata Glasc players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Renata Glasc leads by 581 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Shaco players can confidently pick into Renata Glasc and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Renata Glasc away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco vs Renata Glasc Laning Phase Breakdown
Shaco is favored during the laning phase against Renata Glasc, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Shaco holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Shaco Build Against Renata Glasc
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Renata Glasc, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Renata Glasc are Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Renata Glasc. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Shaco0.0%Renata Glasc0.0%Shaco100.0%Renata Glasc0.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Shaco and Renata Glasc, with Shaco holding a razor-thin 0.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Shaco is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Renata Glasc. Extended games heavily favor Shaco, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Shaco holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Renata Glasc players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Shaco Runes Against Renata Glasc
Sorcery
Domination
Running Sorcery primary with Domination secondary allows Shaco to press their advantage against Renata Glasc, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.78% | 251 | 0.8 | 735 | 12,775 | 52.0% | 55.0% | |
| 46.63% | 208 | 0.8 | 760 | 12,520 | 32.5% | 56.0% | |
| 46.63% | 193 | 0.9 | 712 | 12,794 | 51.5% | 44.1% | |
| 47.49% | 179 | 0.9 | 693 | 12,388 | 44.6% | 49.5% | |
| 49.08% | 163 | 0.8 | 700 | 12,552 | 52.5% | 47.1% | |
| 45.68% | 162 | 0.8 | 690 | 12,470 | 38.8% | 48.7% | |
| 42.21% | 154 | 0.9 | 687 | 12,423 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 55.78% | 147 | 0.8 | 704 | 12,682 | 54.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.55% | 142 | 0.9 | 753 | 12,537 | 45.8% | 39.4% | |
| 46.79% | 109 | 0.9 | 833 | 13,479 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.22% | 108 | 0.8 | 715 | 12,751 | 47.4% | 47.1% | |
| 43.68% | 87 | 0.9 | 746 | 12,838 | 38.5% | 45.9% | |
| 46.34% | 82 | 1.1 | 724 | 12,050 | 38.7% | 51.0% | |
| 45.68% | 81 | 0.8 | 738 | 12,482 | 48.1% | 44.4% | |
| 53.16% | 79 | 0.8 | 732 | 12,009 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 40.51% | 79 | 0.8 | 702 | 12,540 | 47.1% | 35.6% | |
| 47.89% | 71 | 0.8 | 676 | 12,189 | 50.0% | 46.5% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.4 | 677 | 9,927 | 37.5% | 47.4% | |
| 44.29% | 70 | 0.7 | 752 | 13,324 | 32.0% | 51.1% | |
| 52.94% | 68 | 0.9 | 649 | 12,253 | 56.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.29% | 68 | 0.9 | 756 | 12,571 | 45.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 0.8 | 720 | 12,167 | 58.6% | 50.0% | |
| 38.71% | 62 | 0.9 | 685 | 12,257 | 44.0% | 35.1% | |
| 57.38% | 61 | 0.9 | 694 | 12,460 | 77.3% | 46.1% | |
| 61.40% | 57 | 1.1 | 816 | 12,782 | 64.0% | 59.4% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 0.8 | 731 | 13,619 | 52.9% | 55.0% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 1.0 | 666 | 12,710 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 1.5 | 708 | 9,719 | 42.9% | 54.3% | |
| 62.96% | 54 | 1.0 | 697 | 13,217 | 64.7% | 62.2% | |
| 53.70% | 54 | 1.4 | 686 | 9,936 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 1.0 | 692 | 12,018 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 43.40% | 53 | 0.7 | 674 | 13,034 | 57.1% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.4 | 773 | 10,590 | 52.9% | 48.6% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 1.7 | 725 | 12,087 | 76.9% | 42.1% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 0.8 | 623 | 11,568 | 60.0% | 42.3% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 731 | 9,845 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.5 | 728 | 10,749 | 62.5% | 48.5% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.4 | 745 | 11,074 | 55.6% | 44.8% | |
| 68.09% | 47 | 0.8 | 693 | 12,839 | 50.0% | 79.3% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 1.2 | 817 | 12,274 | 64.3% | 63.6% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 1.0 | 694 | 12,130 | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 1.4 | 802 | 12,356 | 56.3% | 48.3% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 0.9 | 663 | 13,425 | 57.1% | 54.8% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 1.3 | 728 | 12,130 | 35.7% | 63.3% | |
| 63.64% | 44 | 0.8 | 707 | 12,188 | 64.7% | 63.0% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 1.5 | 649 | 8,967 | 43.5% | 45.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 1.4 | 777 | 9,646 | 53.3% | 45.8% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 1.3 | 811 | 12,270 | 30.8% | 45.5% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.6 | 715 | 9,993 | 53.9% | 61.9% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 1.0 | 833 | 13,438 | 20.0% | 65.2% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 0.8 | 731 | 13,284 | 57.1% | 42.3% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 0.8 | 813 | 12,926 | 45.5% | 36.4% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.1 | 756 | 13,782 | 42.9% | 61.5% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 1.1 | 705 | 12,215 | 23.1% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.7 | 815 | 10,249 | 53.9% | 47.1% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 1.6 | 721 | 11,239 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 0.8 | 776 | 12,901 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 0.8 | 695 | 12,094 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.6 | 628 | 9,951 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 1.3 | 658 | 9,533 | 45.5% | 46.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.2 | 783 | 12,005 | 71.4% | 38.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 0.8 | 807 | 11,341 | 62.5% | 35.3% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 1.4 | 659 | 8,743 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.5 | 728 | 10,412 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 0.8 | 762 | 13,492 | 16.7% | 61.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.5 | 874 | 10,939 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 0.9 | 806 | 11,729 | 72.7% | 45.5% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.6 | 716 | 10,231 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.6 | 680 | 11,521 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.3 | 705 | 11,740 | 37.5% | 76.9% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 858 | 13,385 | 44.4% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.5 | 736 | 10,379 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.7 | 706 | 13,127 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.6 | 755 | 12,612 | 66.7% | 38.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.2 | 676 | 8,827 | 62.5% | 36.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 2.0 | 770 | 12,376 | 71.4% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.1 | 695 | 13,169 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.1 | 784 | 11,640 | 80.0% | 46.1% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.3 | 537 | 9,552 | 57.1% | 30.0% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.5 | 812 | 9,557 | 83.3% | 63.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.3 | 846 | 12,059 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.1 | 688 | 10,438 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 712 | 9,121 | 71.4% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.7 | 865 | 11,128 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.1 | 614 | 10,490 | 57.1% | 22.2% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 0.8 | 838 | 14,301 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.1 | 782 | 13,637 | 33.3% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.7 | 555 | 10,151 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.6 | 674 | 10,259 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.7 | 722 | 13,815 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 91.67% | 12 | 1.3 | 941 | 12,533 | 100.0% | 90.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.3 | 596 | 9,167 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 0.7 | 662 | 13,017 | 80.0% | 83.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.5 | 837 | 12,727 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 857 | 12,738 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.8 | 743 | 11,130 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 686 | 10,646 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 790 | 9,382 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 506 | 9,448 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 618 | 10,982 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.6 | 684 | 8,549 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.5 | 737 | 9,449 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.2 | 637 | 9,858 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.4 | 680 | 10,517 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 708 | 11,240 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.1 | 736 | 11,364 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.6 | 466 | 11,063 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 763 | 11,027 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 707 | 12,345 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 831 | 8,409 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.7 | 710 | 10,991 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.4 | 637 | 13,008 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 559 | 12,436 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 699 | 12,977 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 572 | 9,842 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 543 | 7,261 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 651 | 14,065 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco vs Renata Glasc - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Shaco do against Renata Glasc in League of Legends?
Shaco wins the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to Renata Glasc's 0.0%, a 100.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Shaco do against Renata Glasc in the early game?
In the early game, Shaco has the advantage against Renata Glasc with a 0.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Shaco players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Shaco do against Renata Glasc in the late game?
In the late game, Shaco takes over the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Shaco scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup?
Shaco wins the matchup against Renata Glasc with a 100.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 100.0 percentage point advantage means Shaco is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Shaco build against Renata Glasc?
The best Shaco build against Renata Glasc includes Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame, Blackfire Torch with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Shaco runes against Renata Glasc?
The best Shaco runes against Renata Glasc use the Sorcery primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Shaco counter Renata Glasc?
Yes, Shaco has a favorable matchup against Renata Glasc with a 100.0% win rate. Shaco strongly counters Renata Glasc in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Shaco against Renata Glasc?
When playing Shaco against Renata Glasc, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.