
Shaco vs Renata Glasc is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.17. Renata Glasc wins with a 83.3% win rate (+66.7%) over Shaco based on 6 games. Renata Glasc holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Renata Glasc wins with a 83.3% win rate compared to Shaco's 16.7%, giving Renata Glasc a 66.7 percentage point advantage. Renata Glasc dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Shaco players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Renata Glasc leads by 249 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Renata Glasc has a strong advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Renata Glasc overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco is favored during the laning phase against Renata Glasc, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Shaco holds advantages in farming, damage and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Renata Glasc, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Renata Glasc are Liandry's Torment, Imperial Mandate and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Renata Glasc. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup.
Renata Glasc dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Shaco. This lopsided early game means Renata Glasc can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Renata Glasc is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 80.0% win rate — 60.0 points above Shaco. Extended games heavily favor Renata Glasc, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Renata Glasc holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Shaco players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
The Sorcery and Domination rune setup gives Shaco the best tools to compete against Renata Glasc in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.17. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.11% | 112 | 0.8 | 699 | 13,115 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 43.88% | 98 | 0.9 | 733 | 13,347 | 40.6% | 45.5% | |
| 50.57% | 87 | 0.8 | 720 | 12,795 | 42.9% | 54.2% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 0.9 | 730 | 13,141 | 60.7% | 45.1% | |
| 45.45% | 77 | 0.9 | 719 | 13,156 | 38.5% | 49.0% | |
| 47.37% | 76 | 0.9 | 714 | 12,316 | 46.4% | 47.9% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 0.9 | 642 | 13,025 | 57.1% | 52.1% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 0.7 | 658 | 12,127 | 38.5% | 51.2% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 0.8 | 762 | 12,011 | 44.1% | 72.7% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 1.0 | 829 | 13,661 | 59.1% | 51.4% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 0.8 | 715 | 11,770 | 69.6% | 58.3% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 0.8 | 735 | 13,597 | 46.1% | 46.4% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 0.8 | 752 | 12,696 | 41.2% | 43.5% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 0.8 | 780 | 13,227 | 46.7% | 54.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 0.8 | 660 | 11,973 | 70.0% | 42.1% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 0.9 | 747 | 13,225 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 0.8 | 799 | 12,249 | 27.8% | 42.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 0.9 | 683 | 13,219 | 53.3% | 39.1% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 0.8 | 712 | 12,545 | 37.5% | 59.1% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 0.8 | 645 | 12,541 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 0.8 | 731 | 12,325 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 1.8 | 628 | 8,901 | 41.2% | 40.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 0.8 | 661 | 10,954 | 47.1% | 40.0% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 0.9 | 687 | 12,950 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 0.9 | 778 | 13,504 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 0.7 | 629 | 12,404 | 35.7% | 35.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.4 | 733 | 11,365 | 50.0% | 34.8% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 0.8 | 673 | 12,052 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 1.0 | 656 | 12,212 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 0.8 | 771 | 11,590 | 46.7% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.7 | 623 | 11,686 | 41.7% | 66.7% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 0.9 | 790 | 13,680 | 50.0% | 29.4% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 767 | 13,664 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 0.8 | 640 | 12,332 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 0.8 | 645 | 12,070 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.4 | 719 | 10,442 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.4 | 672 | 10,119 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 76.19% | 21 | 1.5 | 761 | 10,511 | 85.7% | 71.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.4 | 847 | 12,072 | 75.0% | 30.8% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 0.8 | 688 | 13,452 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 621 | 10,801 | 28.6% | 30.8% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 784 | 9,748 | 71.4% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.3 | 646 | 12,111 | 54.5% | 66.7% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 0.8 | 662 | 11,325 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.8 | 756 | 12,771 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 0.8 | 571 | 11,291 | 85.7% | 30.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.2 | 686 | 13,965 | 80.0% | 58.3% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.6 | 686 | 9,224 | 22.2% | 62.5% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.2 | 782 | 13,774 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.0 | 698 | 13,946 | 20.0% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.0 | 612 | 11,534 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.4 | 734 | 8,978 | 30.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 0.8 | 711 | 14,054 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 825 | 12,487 | 85.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 0.8 | 741 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 702 | 11,951 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.4 | 758 | 10,317 | 16.7% | 37.5% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.0 | 779 | 14,672 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.5 | 788 | 8,801 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.7 | 807 | 9,704 | 28.6% | 80.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 724 | 13,182 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 823 | 13,526 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 0.8 | 777 | 14,569 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.6 | 697 | 9,776 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.9 | 760 | 13,069 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 650 | 11,921 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.8 | 646 | 11,106 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 721 | 9,278 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 0.8 | 702 | 13,012 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 794 | 12,139 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.8 | 780 | 8,599 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.4 | 835 | 10,547 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 872 | 11,440 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.2 | 918 | 13,344 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 1.1 | 597 | 7,819 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 662 | 11,962 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.9 | 735 | 10,740 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 799 | 9,822 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 710 | 11,701 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 595 | 9,345 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 770 | 11,415 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 748 | 11,396 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 700 | 8,905 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.0 | 550 | 8,371 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.3 | 979 | 11,673 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 1,094 | 11,590 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 666 | 8,827 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.5 | 693 | 10,215 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.1 | 742 | 9,762 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 532 | 8,729 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 695 | 9,574 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.2 | 739 | 12,839 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.2 | 741 | 16,400 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 614 | 8,433 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 626 | 8,958 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 542 | 9,832 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.6 | 716 | 12,659 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 890 | 12,384 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 637 | 14,188 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 488 | 11,253 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 924 | 10,719 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Renata Glasc wins the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to Shaco's 16.7%, a 66.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.17.
In the early game, Renata Glasc has the advantage against Shaco with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Renata Glasc players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Renata Glasc takes over the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to 20.0%. Renata Glasc scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Renata Glasc wins the matchup against Shaco with a 83.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.17. The 66.7 percentage point advantage means Renata Glasc is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
The best Shaco build against Renata Glasc includes Liandry's Torment, Imperial Mandate, Blackfire Torch with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Shaco runes against Renata Glasc use the Sorcery primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Renata Glasc matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
No, Shaco struggles against Renata Glasc with only a 16.7% win rate. Renata Glasc has the advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Renata Glasc's lead.
When playing Shaco against Renata Glasc, play cautiously and avoid Renata Glasc's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Renata Glasc has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.