Teemovs Cassiopeia
Teemo vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Teemo wins with a 58.8% win rate (+17.6%) over Cassiopeia based on 17 games. Teemo wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Teemo Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Teemo performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Teemo vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Teemo vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Teemo wins with a 58.8% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 41.2%, giving Teemo a 17.6 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Teemo controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Teemo needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Cassiopeia leads by 278 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Teemo players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Teemo vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Teemo, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Teemo Build Against Cassiopeia
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Teemo needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Teemo against Cassiopeia are Liandry's Torment, Malignance and Statikk Shiv. This combination gives Teemo an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Teemo100.0%
Cassiopeia0.0%Teemo36.4%Cassiopeia63.6%Teemo dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Teemo can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 63.6% win rate — 27.3 points above Teemo. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Teemo must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Teemo Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Teemo to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Teemo matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Teemo's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.42% | 212 | 6.0 | 823 | 11,124 | 51.3% | 51.5% | |
| 46.81% | 188 | 6.8 | 1,041 | 11,148 | 42.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 174 | 6.2 | 919 | 11,145 | 46.1% | 52.3% | |
| 60.87% | 138 | 6.6 | 1,093 | 12,191 | 66.7% | 57.5% | |
| 50.00% | 128 | 6.1 | 1,071 | 12,004 | 47.4% | 51.1% | |
| 43.44% | 122 | 6.5 | 842 | 10,725 | 32.1% | 53.0% | |
| 48.57% | 105 | 6.6 | 1,332 | 11,880 | 41.0% | 53.0% | |
| 46.32% | 95 | 6.5 | 1,116 | 12,603 | 30.4% | 51.4% | |
| 48.39% | 93 | 5.9 | 1,024 | 11,513 | 51.9% | 47.0% | |
| 53.33% | 90 | 6.3 | 1,031 | 11,970 | 57.1% | 50.9% | |
| 52.33% | 86 | 6.5 | 1,011 | 10,724 | 46.1% | 57.5% | |
| 57.50% | 80 | 5.9 | 876 | 10,782 | 57.1% | 57.8% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 6.6 | 915 | 11,631 | 36.0% | 59.6% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 6.5 | 882 | 12,870 | 41.2% | 55.0% | |
| 55.56% | 72 | 6.1 | 869 | 10,780 | 44.4% | 62.2% | |
| 54.93% | 71 | 6.4 | 1,154 | 12,263 | 57.1% | 54.0% | |
| 50.70% | 71 | 6.1 | 960 | 11,649 | 28.0% | 63.0% | |
| 42.03% | 69 | 6.3 | 972 | 12,041 | 30.4% | 47.8% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 6.6 | 1,101 | 12,617 | 50.0% | 46.8% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 6.5 | 974 | 12,297 | 61.9% | 50.0% | |
| 51.67% | 60 | 6.3 | 1,013 | 11,947 | 62.5% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 60 | 6.8 | 1,031 | 12,392 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 60 | 6.0 | 927 | 11,474 | 40.0% | 42.5% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 5.5 | 1,035 | 11,852 | 45.0% | 61.5% | |
| 37.93% | 58 | 6.5 | 1,053 | 11,127 | 38.9% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 58 | 6.6 | 1,044 | 12,911 | 76.9% | 42.2% | |
| 42.11% | 57 | 6.5 | 904 | 11,252 | 48.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 6.3 | 1,062 | 10,357 | 40.9% | 47.1% | |
| 53.70% | 54 | 6.3 | 1,031 | 12,738 | 57.1% | 52.5% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.6 | 986 | 12,667 | 25.0% | 41.5% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 6.3 | 893 | 11,590 | 63.6% | 45.2% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 4.9 | 863 | 10,279 | 42.1% | 44.8% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 6.5 | 1,003 | 12,674 | 60.0% | 57.6% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 5.8 | 947 | 12,229 | 45.8% | 70.8% | |
| 37.50% | 48 | 6.4 | 824 | 11,232 | 42.1% | 34.5% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 3.5 | 945 | 11,721 | 40.0% | 61.5% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.9 | 1,102 | 13,449 | 46.1% | 56.3% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.5 | 1,185 | 12,781 | 57.1% | 53.3% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 3.4 | 879 | 11,682 | 25.0% | 45.2% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.7 | 1,117 | 12,828 | 60.0% | 61.5% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 2.6 | 692 | 9,101 | 25.0% | 48.0% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 6.5 | 1,081 | 12,620 | 56.3% | 59.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 2.6 | 862 | 10,254 | 63.2% | 47.4% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 5.6 | 856 | 10,056 | 64.7% | 28.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 3.6 | 968 | 12,989 | 54.5% | 61.5% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 6.3 | 1,034 | 12,559 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 4.7 | 838 | 12,115 | 27.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 6.9 | 894 | 10,611 | 37.5% | 64.7% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.4 | 942 | 11,520 | 46.1% | 55.6% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.7 | 912 | 11,629 | 22.2% | 55.0% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 6.0 | 983 | 12,689 | 50.0% | 34.8% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 5.5 | 988 | 11,297 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 6.7 | 968 | 11,220 | 37.5% | 57.9% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 3.3 | 872 | 10,727 | 64.3% | 53.9% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 5.6 | 1,029 | 12,193 | 11.1% | 72.2% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.9 | 874 | 12,507 | 62.5% | 35.3% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 2.1 | 944 | 13,428 | 40.0% | 36.8% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 2.9 | 960 | 13,027 | 22.2% | 46.7% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 3.2 | 1,161 | 14,491 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 3.2 | 869 | 10,807 | 42.9% | 56.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.6 | 975 | 10,753 | 66.7% | 53.9% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.2 | 976 | 10,729 | 30.0% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.5 | 1,055 | 10,898 | 45.5% | 45.5% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.5 | 824 | 10,570 | 42.9% | 57.1% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 5.7 | 905 | 13,099 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.6 | 895 | 10,940 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.9 | 777 | 11,972 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.1 | 875 | 10,390 | 37.5% | 58.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.7 | 1,045 | 14,550 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.5 | 834 | 10,896 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 18 | 4.7 | 883 | 11,990 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 2.9 | 887 | 9,767 | 22.2% | 66.7% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 5.3 | 1,074 | 11,737 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.8 | 959 | 12,136 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.8 | 863 | 10,452 | 100.0% | 36.4% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 6.2 | 893 | 10,864 | 77.8% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.8 | 778 | 8,703 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.6 | 897 | 11,604 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.4 | 872 | 10,841 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 7.5 | 1,046 | 14,182 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.4 | 763 | 9,925 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.6 | 901 | 12,134 | 28.6% | 37.5% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 1,044 | 12,814 | 100.0% | 72.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 4.4 | 831 | 10,916 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.0 | 771 | 7,910 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.3 | 967 | 12,298 | 80.0% | 55.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.9 | 904 | 12,639 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.8 | 891 | 10,868 | 42.9% | 71.4% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.6 | 1,168 | 13,795 | 75.0% | 11.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 3.8 | 971 | 13,351 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.8 | 757 | 10,333 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.5 | 817 | 11,085 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 3.6 | 802 | 9,139 | 33.3% | 14.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.4 | 933 | 11,660 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.6 | 839 | 11,710 | 33.3% | 85.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.5 | 856 | 11,870 | 100.0% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.6 | 746 | 9,757 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 2.7 | 762 | 9,903 | 20.0% | 14.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.0 | 874 | 10,198 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 6.2 | 840 | 12,120 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 954 | 9,536 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.2 | 953 | 13,180 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.0 | 978 | 12,531 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.3 | 875 | 9,892 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.8 | 939 | 9,469 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.1 | 796 | 10,000 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.7 | 804 | 11,273 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.8 | 1,034 | 13,781 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.8 | 1,133 | 13,061 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.2 | 1,044 | 11,668 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 916 | 11,284 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 803 | 11,371 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.7 | 914 | 12,546 | 0.0% | 85.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 998 | 12,992 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 975 | 12,551 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 834 | 9,281 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 751 | 11,228 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.7 | 899 | 11,855 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 807 | 11,126 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.9 | 814 | 9,373 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.1 | 887 | 8,773 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.4 | 799 | 11,326 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.9 | 1,097 | 7,635 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.4 | 1,040 | 13,936 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.5 | 892 | 10,475 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.4 | 1,098 | 14,331 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 1,143 | 13,690 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 1,110 | 13,099 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.1 | 834 | 13,429 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 4.3 | 1,021 | 12,489 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 3.0 | 748 | 7,543 | 83.3% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 889 | 10,652 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.0 | 1,179 | 8,579 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.4 | 1,113 | 13,484 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.2 | 949 | 10,862 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 7.4 | 851 | 13,301 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 896 | 10,995 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 967 | 10,915 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.4 | 892 | 11,259 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 845 | 15,366 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.2 | 979 | 10,342 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 770 | 7,808 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 772 | 13,467 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 0.8 | 655 | 5,284 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 1,002 | 8,330 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 822 | 13,707 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 769 | 10,248 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 794 | 9,984 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Teemo vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Teemo do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Teemo wins the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 58.8% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 41.2%, a 17.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Teemo do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Teemo has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Teemo players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Teemo do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 63.6% win rate compared to 36.4%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Teemo wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 58.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 17.6 percentage point advantage means Teemo is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Teemo build against Cassiopeia?
The best Teemo build against Cassiopeia includes Liandry's Torment, Malignance, Statikk Shiv with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Teemo runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Teemo runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the Teemo vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Teemo counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Teemo has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 58.8% win rate. Teemo strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Teemo against Cassiopeia?
When playing Teemo against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.