
Teemovs Zac
Teemo vs Zac is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Teemo wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Zac based on 7 games. Teemo holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Teemo vs Zac matchup.
Teemo Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Teemo performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Teemo vs Zac Matchup?

Teemo vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Teemo vs Zac matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Teemo wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Zac's 28.6%, giving Teemo a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Teemo dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Zac players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 2,717 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Teemo players can confidently pick into Zac and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Zac away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Teemo vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Teemo is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Teemo holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Teemo Build Against Zac
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Zac, providing the mobility and stats Teemo needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Teemo against Zac are Shadowflame, Malignance and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Teemo an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Zac. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Teemo vs Zac matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Teemo dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Zac. This lopsided early game means Teemo can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Teemo is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Zac. Extended games heavily favor Teemo, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Teemo holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Zac players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Teemo Runes Against Zac
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Teemo to press their advantage against Zac, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Teemo matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Teemo's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.17% | 83 | 6.2 | 839 | 11,525 | 35.7% | 45.5% | |
| 45.78% | 83 | 7.0 | 1,052 | 11,104 | 41.2% | 49.0% | |
| 48.68% | 76 | 6.2 | 923 | 11,376 | 40.0% | 52.9% | |
| 61.02% | 59 | 6.7 | 1,078 | 11,680 | 65.0% | 59.0% | |
| 36.54% | 52 | 6.5 | 859 | 10,432 | 25.9% | 48.0% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 6.2 | 1,014 | 11,618 | 66.7% | 47.2% | |
| 54.90% | 51 | 6.5 | 914 | 10,886 | 42.9% | 63.3% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 6.1 | 1,022 | 11,218 | 47.4% | 46.9% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.2 | 1,019 | 11,763 | 50.0% | 51.7% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 6.7 | 1,298 | 11,718 | 47.4% | 58.6% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 6.5 | 1,152 | 11,841 | 46.1% | 48.3% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 6.5 | 870 | 12,283 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.3 | 916 | 10,921 | 31.3% | 57.1% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 5.9 | 821 | 9,774 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 6.0 | 858 | 10,509 | 64.7% | 57.9% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 6.7 | 1,085 | 12,741 | 44.4% | 46.1% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.7 | 912 | 11,526 | 30.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 6.7 | 1,125 | 12,799 | 62.5% | 56.0% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.7 | 874 | 10,976 | 35.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 6.5 | 948 | 11,838 | 45.5% | 42.1% | |
| 75.86% | 29 | 7.2 | 1,050 | 13,016 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.0 | 996 | 11,263 | 36.4% | 61.1% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.8 | 1,078 | 12,640 | 83.3% | 40.9% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.8 | 937 | 12,114 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.3 | 860 | 10,803 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 6.3 | 975 | 11,467 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.5 | 1,116 | 12,298 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.7 | 979 | 12,325 | 14.3% | 47.4% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 3.9 | 818 | 11,035 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.2 | 1,064 | 10,094 | 57.1% | 31.6% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 1,045 | 13,267 | 16.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 1,016 | 11,702 | 54.5% | 57.1% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 6.2 | 994 | 9,889 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 5.4 | 940 | 11,704 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.5 | 1,006 | 10,937 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 2.8 | 862 | 9,623 | 80.0% | 45.5% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.0 | 1,000 | 13,658 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.5 | 1,000 | 12,124 | 33.3% | 63.6% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.4 | 844 | 11,092 | 75.0% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 7.4 | 1,048 | 12,630 | 57.1% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.3 | 1,098 | 11,501 | 62.5% | 70.0% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 6.4 | 991 | 11,282 | 70.0% | 85.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.8 | 966 | 11,762 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.1 | 821 | 10,193 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.3 | 896 | 12,127 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.6 | 998 | 12,638 | 28.6% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 1,044 | 13,187 | 75.0% | 54.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 3.1 | 688 | 8,977 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.8 | 989 | 11,512 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.5 | 948 | 10,270 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.8 | 1,093 | 9,877 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.7 | 927 | 11,168 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.8 | 956 | 12,867 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.1 | 1,050 | 13,127 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.0 | 1,106 | 12,714 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.2 | 864 | 9,633 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.5 | 853 | 11,528 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,066 | 12,862 | 100.0% | 77.8% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.1 | 930 | 12,267 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.4 | 912 | 13,946 | 0.0% | 30.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.9 | 1,028 | 13,060 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 749 | 12,026 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.4 | 865 | 11,109 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 784 | 11,035 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.2 | 1,079 | 11,027 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.3 | 884 | 11,712 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.5 | 1,135 | 10,869 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 3.3 | 860 | 10,682 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 3.0 | 651 | 8,035 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 964 | 15,060 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.1 | 939 | 10,183 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.7 | 1,165 | 14,328 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 944 | 12,028 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 986 | 13,284 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 866 | 12,771 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.3 | 955 | 13,148 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 880 | 13,498 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.5 | 1,174 | 12,310 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.5 | 1,149 | 12,654 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 728 | 9,445 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.3 | 979 | 10,931 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.8 | 873 | 11,623 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.4 | 1,227 | 14,724 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 1,030 | 12,389 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 1,113 | 12,584 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 998 | 13,463 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.8 | 930 | 11,009 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.1 | 1,006 | 12,750 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 808 | 12,370 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 905 | 11,052 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,207 | 11,798 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 1,099 | 12,130 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.9 | 668 | 9,783 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.6 | 1,078 | 12,217 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 678 | 10,051 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 1,016 | 13,884 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,186 | 15,661 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 874 | 11,474 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 820 | 12,510 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 846 | 15,582 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 678 | 7,575 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 974 | 14,947 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 754 | 9,749 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 760 | 9,753 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 881 | 13,720 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 925 | 9,285 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Teemo vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Teemo do against Zac in League of Legends?
Teemo wins the Teemo vs Zac matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Zac's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Teemo do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Teemo has the advantage against Zac with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Teemo players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Teemo do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Teemo takes over the Teemo vs Zac matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Teemo scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Teemo vs Zac matchup?
Teemo wins the matchup against Zac with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Teemo is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Teemo build against Zac?
The best Teemo build against Zac includes Shadowflame, Malignance, Rabadon's Deathcap with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Teemo runes against Zac?
The best Teemo runes against Zac use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Teemo vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Teemo counter Zac?
Yes, Teemo has a favorable matchup against Zac with a 71.4% win rate. Teemo strongly counters Zac in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Teemo against Zac?
When playing Teemo against Zac, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
