- Win Rate
- 52.3%
- Pick Rate
- 4.4%
- Ban Rate
- 7.0%
Warwick vs Tryndamere
- Patch
- 26.19
- Games
- 4,004
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Oct 5, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Warwick vs Tryndamere is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.19. Warwick wins with a 55.2% win rate (+10.3%) over Tryndamere based on 29 games. Warwick holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Warwick build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Warwick vs Tryndamere matchup.
Warwick Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Warwick performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who wins Warwick vs Tryndamere?
Warwick wins 43.8% of these games. With this many games the true rate is most likely between 28.2% and 60.7% (95% range).
- Expected
- 52.0% From both champions' overall Jungle win rates
- Matchup effect
- −8.2 pts Observed minus expected
- Sample
- 32 games Lane: Jungle
- vs patch 26.18
- — Not enough games on both patches
Lane: Jungle · Ranked Solo/Duo & Flex · North America server · All ranks · Patch 26.19 · Sep 24 – Sep 28
They also met in another lane (Top): 31 games, Warwick won 51.6%.
Key takeaways
- Current data slightly favors Tryndamere, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Warwick wins 43.8% of 32 games (95% range 28.2–60.7%).
- Both champions' overall Jungle win rates predict 52.0% for Warwick; the result is within the margin of error of that, so this matchup mostly reflects the two champions' general strength.
- Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 112, within the margin of error (31 games).
- Warwick players pick Stridebreaker much less often against Tryndamere: 45.1% of their other Jungle games, 21.9% here.
How we calculate this
Games: ranked Solo/Duo and Flex games on the North America server from the patch shown. Remakes (games under 5 minutes) are excluded.
A game only counts when Warwick and Tryndamere played the same position on opposite teams, so roaming, lane swaps within a team or a champion merely being in the same game never count as this matchup.
The 95% range is a Wilson score interval. Confidence comes from how wide that range is: within ±3 points is very high, ±5 high, ±8 moderate, anything wider low. Below 20 games a matchup is not classified at all.
Expected win rate combines both champions’ win rates in this lane (same games and filters) with the log5 formula: E = A(1−B) / (A(1−B) + B(1−A)). Matchup effect = observed − expected.
"What changes" compares Warwick's choices in this matchup with the same champion's other games in the same lane, and lists a change only when it is at least 3 points and statistically significant (two-proportion z-test, |z| ≥ 2, 20+ games).
Results are not split by rank: the sample per rank is too small for honest per-rank matchup numbers.
Warwick vs Tryndamere Laning Stats
At 15 minutes
Whole-game averages
Warwick vs Tryndamere Win Rate by Game Length
Warwick's win rate against Tryndamere by game length. The dot is the win rate, the bar its 95% range and the dashed line the champion's usual win rate at that length. Lengths with fewer than 25 games are left blank.
No game length stands out: Warwick's results against Tryndamere in short and long games are within the margin of error of each other.
Warwick vs Tryndamere Power Spikes
Who is ahead at each stage, measured from these games. A stage reads "Even" when the difference is inside the margin of error, and "Insufficient data" when there are too few games to tell.
- Lane (15 min)EvenWarwick gold at 15: +112
- First itemInsufficient data
- Games under 20 minInsufficient data
- 20–30 min gamesInsufficient data
- 30+ min gamesInsufficient data
What Warwick Changes Against Tryndamere
Choices Warwick players make noticeably more or less often in this matchup than in their other Jungle games.
StridebreakerItemUsually45.1%vs Tryndamere21.9%−23.2 pts
Mercury's TreadsBootsUsually32.6%vs Tryndamere12.5%−20.1 pts
Kraken SlayerItemUsually28.4%vs Tryndamere46.9%+18.5 pts
Berserker's GreavesBootsUsually6.2%vs Tryndamere21.9%+15.7 pts
Scorchclaw Pup + Health PotionStarting itemsUsually4.1%vs Tryndamere12.5%+8.4 pts
Taste of BloodRuneUsually2.8%vs Tryndamere9.4%+6.6 pts
Sundered SkyItemUsuallyunder 0.5%vs Tryndamere3.1%+3.1 pts
Mosstomper Seedling + Health Potion + Oracle LensStarting itemsUsuallyunder 0.5%vs Tryndamere3.1%+3.1 pts
Best Warwick Build vs Tryndamere
Usual Warwick build (Jungle)
63.8% win rate · 152 games
Against Tryndamere
Not enough matchup-specific build data: only 4 of 22 Warwick games against Tryndamere carried a complete build, which is too few to recommend an item path from. Use Warwick's standard build instead.
- Skill priority: W > Q > E — the same as usual.
Builds are ranked by the lower edge of their win rate range, not the raw win rate, so a build seen in a handful of wins never outranks a proven one.
Best Warwick Runes vs Tryndamere
Usual Warwick runes (Jungle)
Lethal Tempo
51.7% win rate · 3,942 games
Against Tryndamere
Too few games for a matchup-specific rune page yet — use the usual page.
Plan your Warwick draft in Draft Lab
Draft Lab lays out both teams lane by lane with live matchup win rates, damage profiles and game-phase lean, and suggests picks and bans from current meta data.
- Full 5v5 draft board
- Lane matchup win rates
- Pick and ban suggestions
Warwick matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.19. The table below shows Warwick's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Warwick build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Other Warwick Matchups
Hardest for Warwick
Easiest for Warwick
Win rate and games for each matchup. Lists are ranked by the edge of the 95% range so small samples cannot top them; matchups with at least 50 games only.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Warwick vs Tryndamere FAQ - Patch 26.19
Who wins Warwick vs Tryndamere?
Current data slightly favors Tryndamere, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Warwick wins 43.8% of 32 games (95% range 28.2–60.7%).
What is Warwick's win rate against Tryndamere?
Warwick wins 43.8% of 32 Jungle games against Tryndamere on patch 26.19 (95% range 28.2–60.7%). Based on both champions' overall Jungle win rates, 52.0% would be expected.
Does Warwick counter Tryndamere?
Not clearly. Warwick wins 43.8% of 32 games against Tryndamere, and the 95% range (28.2–60.7%) includes 50%, so neither champion reliably counters the other on current data.
Who wins lane, Warwick or Tryndamere?
Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 112, within the margin of error (31 games).
Does Warwick outscale Tryndamere?
There are too few games of each length to tell yet.
When is Tryndamere strongest against Warwick?
On current data there is no stage of the game where Tryndamere is ahead of Warwick beyond the margin of error.
What should Warwick build against Tryndamere?
There are not enough games for a matchup-specific core, so use Warwick's usual Jungle core: Death's Dance, Titanic Hydra, Blade of The Ruined King. The biggest change against Tryndamere: Stridebreaker (45.1% usually, 21.9% here).
What runes should Warwick use against Tryndamere?
Use Warwick's usual Lethal Tempo page (Precision + Sorcery); there are too few games for a matchup-specific page. The biggest change against Tryndamere: Taste of Blood (2.8% usually, 9.4% here).