
Vivs Zac
Vi vs Zac is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Zac wins with a 51.2% win rate (+2.4%) over Vi based on 41 games. Vi wins the early laning phase while Zac scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Vi build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Vi vs Zac matchup.
Vi Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Vi performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Vi vs Zac Matchup?

Vi vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Vi vs Zac matchup is a very close matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 41 recent matches analyzed, Zac wins with a 51.2% win rate compared to Vi's 48.8%, giving Zac a 2.4 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Vi controls the early laning stage, but Zac outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Vi needs to press advantages before Zac reaches their power spikes, while Zac should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 1,558 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Zac is slightly favored, Vi can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Zac's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Vi vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Vi is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Vi holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Vi Build Against Zac
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Zac, providing the mobility and stats Vi needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Vi against Zac are Sundered Sky, Death's Dance and Black Cleaver. This combination gives Vi an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Zac. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Vi vs Zac matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Vi dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Zac. This lopsided early game means Vi can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 70.0% win rate — 40.0 points above Vi. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Vi must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Zac reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Zac survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Vi Runes Against Zac
The Precision primary with Inspiration secondary combination helps Vi maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Zac.
Vi matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Vi's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Vi build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.95% | 228 | 0.9 | 650 | 12,243 | 50.5% | 57.3% | |
| 44.86% | 214 | 1.0 | 695 | 12,725 | 48.8% | 42.3% | |
| 50.00% | 208 | 1.0 | 697 | 12,984 | 51.3% | 49.2% | |
| 43.37% | 196 | 1.0 | 658 | 12,584 | 34.6% | 49.6% | |
| 53.85% | 182 | 1.0 | 690 | 13,097 | 52.9% | 54.5% | |
| 47.25% | 182 | 1.0 | 649 | 12,632 | 48.8% | 46.0% | |
| 46.93% | 179 | 1.0 | 673 | 12,330 | 48.6% | 45.7% | |
| 55.77% | 156 | 0.9 | 610 | 12,325 | 53.8% | 57.9% | |
| 49.01% | 151 | 1.0 | 687 | 12,916 | 49.2% | 48.9% | |
| 46.81% | 141 | 0.9 | 613 | 12,289 | 39.7% | 51.8% | |
| 45.31% | 128 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,611 | 49.0% | 43.0% | |
| 50.00% | 120 | 1.1 | 653 | 13,017 | 42.9% | 53.9% | |
| 53.85% | 117 | 1.0 | 647 | 13,281 | 53.5% | 54.0% | |
| 51.06% | 94 | 1.1 | 623 | 12,225 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 1.1 | 728 | 12,432 | 48.4% | 52.8% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 1.1 | 736 | 13,363 | 50.0% | 58.0% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 0.9 | 645 | 12,465 | 53.3% | 42.9% | |
| 58.97% | 78 | 1.0 | 707 | 13,115 | 58.1% | 59.6% | |
| 46.67% | 75 | 0.9 | 629 | 12,631 | 40.0% | 51.1% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 1.1 | 702 | 12,258 | 34.2% | 54.3% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 1.0 | 712 | 13,253 | 35.7% | 53.5% | |
| 49.30% | 71 | 1.2 | 683 | 12,372 | 47.2% | 51.4% | |
| 44.29% | 70 | 1.1 | 607 | 12,057 | 54.2% | 39.1% | |
| 49.28% | 69 | 0.9 | 698 | 13,368 | 54.5% | 46.8% | |
| 44.12% | 68 | 1.1 | 657 | 12,611 | 59.3% | 34.1% | |
| 52.31% | 65 | 1.4 | 716 | 13,121 | 60.0% | 47.5% | |
| 47.69% | 65 | 1.0 | 656 | 11,742 | 35.7% | 56.8% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.4 | 715 | 12,066 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 40.68% | 59 | 0.9 | 622 | 11,864 | 30.4% | 47.2% | |
| 43.86% | 57 | 0.9 | 666 | 12,552 | 34.6% | 51.6% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 1.0 | 704 | 12,574 | 52.2% | 51.5% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 1.3 | 633 | 13,002 | 57.1% | 54.8% | |
| 40.00% | 50 | 1.0 | 614 | 12,049 | 39.1% | 40.7% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.9 | 615 | 12,644 | 66.7% | 45.2% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 1.0 | 632 | 13,019 | 35.3% | 46.4% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 1.0 | 737 | 12,676 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.0 | 678 | 12,317 | 63.2% | 42.9% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 0.8 | 654 | 11,396 | 50.0% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 0.9 | 612 | 12,823 | 42.9% | 54.5% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 1.9 | 948 | 13,633 | 50.0% | 42.1% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 1.0 | 632 | 12,791 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.0 | 604 | 13,091 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 1.0 | 608 | 11,814 | 55.6% | 76.9% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 1.5 | 601 | 12,912 | 54.5% | 26.3% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.0 | 719 | 13,824 | 44.4% | 47.6% | |
| 68.97% | 29 | 1.6 | 637 | 11,948 | 78.6% | 60.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.6 | 597 | 11,306 | 73.3% | 30.8% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.0 | 760 | 12,145 | 46.7% | 61.5% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 1.9 | 638 | 12,433 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 32.00% | 25 | 1.3 | 672 | 12,326 | 0.0% | 47.1% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 2.1 | 695 | 11,137 | 25.0% | 41.7% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 2.0 | 735 | 12,498 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 0.9 | 650 | 11,284 | 54.5% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.4 | 565 | 11,090 | 44.4% | 53.9% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 2.0 | 864 | 13,400 | 83.3% | 56.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.2 | 633 | 11,351 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 2.5 | 846 | 13,557 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.7 | 634 | 11,375 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.9 | 610 | 11,627 | 28.6% | 45.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.6 | 550 | 9,959 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 0.8 | 670 | 14,061 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.2 | 841 | 10,947 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.7 | 872 | 12,928 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.1 | 669 | 12,722 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.2 | 606 | 11,125 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 0.8 | 586 | 10,750 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 3.6 | 820 | 13,238 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.6 | 810 | 10,454 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.0 | 933 | 13,630 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.0 | 714 | 10,694 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 701 | 10,051 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 593 | 11,809 | 20.0% | 40.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.6 | 787 | 11,469 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 889 | 12,558 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 665 | 11,826 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 649 | 10,902 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.1 | 694 | 12,335 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.5 | 718 | 12,845 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 607 | 11,733 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 685 | 13,096 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.9 | 577 | 9,006 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.0 | 730 | 11,716 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 742 | 10,008 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.1 | 753 | 11,065 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.0 | 645 | 10,719 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.9 | 953 | 12,441 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.5 | 882 | 14,192 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.4 | 711 | 9,877 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.7 | 635 | 10,594 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 675 | 12,224 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.8 | 673 | 10,117 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 687 | 14,774 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 683 | 12,956 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 950 | 15,667 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 668 | 11,726 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.6 | 737 | 14,262 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 985 | 10,415 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Vi vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Vi do against Zac in League of Legends?
Zac wins the Vi vs Zac matchup with a 51.2% win rate compared to Vi's 48.8%, a 2.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 41 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Vi do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Vi has the advantage against Zac with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Vi players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Vi do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Vi vs Zac matchup with a 70.0% win rate compared to 30.0%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Vi vs Zac matchup?
Zac wins the matchup against Vi with a 51.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 2.4 percentage point advantage means Zac is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 41 games analyzed.
What is the best Vi build against Zac?
The best Vi build against Zac includes Sundered Sky, Death's Dance, Black Cleaver with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Vi runes against Zac?
The best Vi runes against Zac use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 62.5% win rate in the Vi vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Vi counter Zac?
No, Vi struggles against Zac with only a 48.8% win rate. Zac has the advantage in this matchup. Vi players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Zac's lead.
How do I play Vi against Zac?
When playing Vi against Zac, play cautiously and avoid Zac's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Zac has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.