Zedvs Karma
Zed vs Karma is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Zed wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Karma based on 10 games. Zed wins the early laning phase while Karma scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Zed build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zed vs Karma matchup.
Zed Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zed performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Karma(60.0%)Who Wins the Zed vs Karma Matchup?
Zed vs Karma Matchup Summary
The Zed vs Karma matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 10 recent matches analyzed, Zed wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Karma's 40.0%, giving Zed a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Zed controls the early laning stage, but Karma outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Zed needs to press advantages before Karma reaches their power spikes, while Karma should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Karma leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zed players can confidently pick into Karma and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Karma away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zed vs Karma Laning Phase Breakdown
Zed is favored during the laning phase against Karma, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Zed holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Zed Build Against Karma
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Karma, providing the mobility and stats Zed needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zed against Karma are Voltaic Cyclosword, Serylda's Grudge and Eclipse. This combination gives Zed an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Karma. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zed vs Karma matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Zed100.0%Karma0.0%Zed33.3%Karma66.7%Zed dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Karma. This lopsided early game means Zed can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Karma is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Zed. Extended games heavily favor Karma, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Zed must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Karma reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Karma survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Zed Runes Against Karma
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Zed to press their advantage against Karma, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Zed matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Zed's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zed build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.88% | 433 | 6.4 | 913 | 13,209 | 53.6% | 47.8% | |
| 45.18% | 364 | 6.5 | 899 | 12,724 | 38.6% | 50.5% | |
| 51.48% | 238 | 6.5 | 880 | 13,750 | 50.5% | 52.0% | |
| 49.01% | 205 | 6.5 | 968 | 12,704 | 56.2% | 43.4% | |
| 58.13% | 204 | 6.6 | 1,025 | 12,891 | 55.8% | 60.2% | |
| 48.21% | 195 | 6.2 | 923 | 12,897 | 38.9% | 53.7% | |
| 53.55% | 184 | 5.8 | 874 | 12,972 | 51.8% | 55.0% | |
| 38.99% | 160 | 5.9 | 946 | 12,607 | 38.8% | 39.2% | |
| 49.69% | 160 | 6.3 | 846 | 12,447 | 47.8% | 51.1% | |
| 50.00% | 158 | 6.4 | 984 | 12,740 | 46.7% | 53.0% | |
| 53.25% | 157 | 5.5 | 840 | 12,691 | 51.4% | 54.8% | |
| 56.58% | 154 | 6.1 | 843 | 13,378 | 49.1% | 61.0% | |
| 44.59% | 150 | 5.6 | 925 | 12,810 | 46.8% | 43.0% | |
| 48.89% | 135 | 5.9 | 770 | 12,083 | 47.8% | 50.0% | |
| 46.46% | 129 | 6.2 | 890 | 13,076 | 44.4% | 47.6% | |
| 50.79% | 127 | 6.8 | 912 | 12,572 | 47.8% | 54.2% | |
| 60.18% | 115 | 6.5 | 1,012 | 13,619 | 68.9% | 54.4% | |
| 41.23% | 115 | 6.4 | 897 | 13,418 | 39.2% | 42.9% | |
| 50.89% | 112 | 6.0 | 870 | 12,836 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 48.08% | 105 | 5.9 | 913 | 13,057 | 55.0% | 43.8% | |
| 47.00% | 100 | 6.5 | 827 | 12,167 | 45.0% | 48.3% | |
| 56.25% | 97 | 6.4 | 890 | 13,086 | 63.4% | 50.9% | |
| 45.05% | 92 | 6.2 | 835 | 12,305 | 44.7% | 45.3% | |
| 47.73% | 91 | 6.4 | 871 | 13,300 | 54.0% | 43.1% | |
| 54.95% | 91 | 6.6 | 970 | 13,100 | 58.5% | 52.0% | |
| 44.44% | 90 | 6.6 | 884 | 13,025 | 36.8% | 50.0% | |
| 56.82% | 89 | 6.0 | 863 | 12,783 | 61.5% | 53.1% | |
| 51.72% | 87 | 6.5 | 892 | 13,042 | 53.3% | 50.9% | |
| 50.00% | 86 | 6.0 | 861 | 12,502 | 52.6% | 47.9% | |
| 47.62% | 85 | 6.6 | 987 | 11,941 | 46.7% | 48.7% | |
| 50.60% | 83 | 5.2 | 908 | 13,488 | 52.5% | 48.8% | |
| 50.62% | 82 | 6.8 | 1,042 | 12,461 | 62.5% | 39.0% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 6.6 | 936 | 13,005 | 48.6% | 40.9% | |
| 52.17% | 70 | 6.6 | 1,046 | 13,597 | 65.5% | 42.5% | |
| 44.93% | 69 | 6.4 | 1,024 | 13,202 | 54.2% | 40.0% | |
| 43.08% | 65 | 6.4 | 928 | 12,556 | 36.4% | 46.5% | |
| 46.15% | 65 | 6.6 | 1,102 | 13,642 | 48.4% | 44.1% | |
| 57.14% | 63 | 6.2 | 868 | 12,739 | 55.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.85% | 60 | 5.9 | 960 | 13,906 | 47.6% | 52.6% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 5.9 | 804 | 13,023 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 51 | 6.2 | 925 | 13,285 | 52.2% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 1.7 | 807 | 14,372 | 52.4% | 53.3% | |
| 52.08% | 49 | 2.4 | 961 | 14,514 | 38.9% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 6.0 | 1,086 | 13,213 | 30.0% | 65.4% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 5.1 | 829 | 12,649 | 60.0% | 61.5% | |
| 37.78% | 45 | 1.3 | 873 | 14,628 | 37.5% | 37.9% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 6.9 | 944 | 13,139 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 2.5 | 850 | 14,930 | 66.7% | 32.0% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 5.6 | 957 | 13,300 | 46.7% | 54.2% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 6.0 | 1,012 | 12,928 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 2.1 | 830 | 13,996 | 50.0% | 38.1% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 6.2 | 890 | 12,887 | 64.7% | 52.4% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 6.4 | 979 | 12,318 | 44.4% | 63.2% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 3.1 | 927 | 13,056 | 55.0% | 56.3% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 3.0 | 877 | 13,807 | 53.3% | 76.2% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 3.8 | 1,089 | 13,413 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 6.6 | 1,004 | 14,033 | 60.0% | 36.8% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 5.6 | 880 | 11,960 | 66.7% | 61.1% | |
| 22.58% | 32 | 1.5 | 880 | 13,974 | 37.5% | 6.7% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 2.6 | 900 | 13,705 | 68.8% | 28.6% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 4.4 | 923 | 14,397 | 60.0% | 31.6% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 5.7 | 1,008 | 14,130 | 36.4% | 72.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.8 | 750 | 13,813 | 54.5% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 2.9 | 921 | 15,297 | 75.0% | 45.0% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 1.8 | 834 | 13,137 | 23.1% | 64.3% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 2.0 | 916 | 15,714 | 30.0% | 70.6% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 4.4 | 865 | 14,635 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 6.8 | 1,058 | 14,030 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 897 | 12,329 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 3.9 | 953 | 13,942 | 25.0% | 43.8% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 4.1 | 943 | 13,594 | 70.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 2.3 | 854 | 14,133 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 3.2 | 922 | 13,094 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 73.91% | 23 | 6.4 | 1,022 | 12,667 | 90.9% | 58.3% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.4 | 940 | 12,944 | 87.5% | 40.0% | |
| 21.74% | 23 | 1.4 | 764 | 14,252 | 12.5% | 26.7% | |
| 45.45% | 23 | 5.6 | 851 | 14,071 | 16.7% | 56.3% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 2.6 | 891 | 13,139 | 38.5% | 60.0% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 6.0 | 1,145 | 15,949 | 66.7% | 68.8% | |
| 22.73% | 22 | 1.5 | 838 | 14,692 | 11.1% | 30.8% | |
| 52.38% | 22 | 1.8 | 847 | 13,816 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.0 | 953 | 12,607 | 12.5% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 923 | 16,415 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 869 | 11,811 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.6 | 957 | 15,177 | 44.4% | 70.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.5 | 995 | 13,220 | 88.9% | 22.2% | |
| 43.75% | 17 | 2.7 | 830 | 16,418 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.3 | 926 | 14,383 | 20.0% | 41.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 2.2 | 938 | 16,442 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.8 | 833 | 12,714 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.9 | 929 | 13,327 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.4 | 935 | 14,944 | 80.0% | 36.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.5 | 913 | 12,795 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 6.1 | 854 | 11,752 | 37.5% | 25.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.6 | 734 | 12,789 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 3.1 | 1,002 | 15,731 | 50.0% | 81.8% | |
| 42.86% | 15 | 6.0 | 870 | 11,919 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 898 | 12,593 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.3 | 964 | 15,229 | 75.0% | 45.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.2 | 1,023 | 15,660 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.4 | 828 | 8,617 | 62.5% | 20.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 3.1 | 820 | 12,402 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.7 | 920 | 14,421 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.3 | 939 | 13,235 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 2.5 | 1,063 | 13,775 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 3.0 | 880 | 14,217 | 25.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.5 | 1,085 | 16,243 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 1,159 | 15,613 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.7 | 984 | 12,293 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 4.3 | 744 | 11,530 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.8 | 952 | 12,767 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.1 | 868 | 12,501 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.3 | 764 | 15,236 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.0 | 855 | 14,805 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.1 | 976 | 15,282 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 661 | 12,272 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 800 | 12,096 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 968 | 15,210 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 861 | 12,372 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 1,033 | 12,887 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.7 | 1,070 | 14,712 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.1 | 805 | 14,587 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 817 | 12,606 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 5.5 | 733 | 13,777 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.1 | 904 | 11,508 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.8 | 841 | 12,858 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.0 | 836 | 15,527 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.5 | 1,048 | 13,244 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.3 | 828 | 11,323 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 7.2 | 893 | 14,288 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.6 | 949 | 15,136 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 753 | 12,676 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.9 | 700 | 13,658 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,168 | 14,921 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 889 | 13,372 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 829 | 12,751 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 803 | 11,043 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zed vs Karma - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Zed do against Karma in League of Legends?
Zed wins the Zed vs Karma matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Karma's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 10 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Zed do against Karma in the early game?
In the early game, Zed has the advantage against Karma with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Zed players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Zed do against Karma in the late game?
In the late game, Karma takes over the Zed vs Karma matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Karma scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Zed vs Karma matchup?
Zed wins the matchup against Karma with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Zed is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 10 games analyzed.
What is the best Zed build against Karma?
The best Zed build against Karma includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Serylda's Grudge, Eclipse with Crimson Lucidity. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Zed runes against Karma?
The best Zed runes against Karma use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Zed vs Karma matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Zed counter Karma?
Yes, Zed has a favorable matchup against Karma with a 60.0% win rate. Zed strongly counters Karma in lane based on current patch 26.4 data.
How do I play Zed against Karma?
When playing Zed against Karma, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.