Esta tabla muestra las composiciones de TFT Set 16 más jugadas según la tasa de selección, mostrando las tendencias del meta actual y las estrategias populares. Composiciones de 9 campeones del Set 16: Herrero (78.6% WR, 3.1 prom), Defensor (68.6% WR, 3.6 prom), Herrero (79.4% WR, 3.0 prom). Herrero/Cosechador lidera con 78.61% de win rate y 3.10 de placement promedio. Defensor sigue con 68.62% de win rate. Analizando 55 composiciones de 9 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
Traits
AvgWinFirstPick
3.10
Avg Place
78.61%
Win Rate
22.08%
First Place
1.00%
Pick Rate
3.59
Avg Place
68.62%
Win Rate
15.99%
First Place
0.49%
Pick Rate
2.97
Avg Place
79.39%
Win Rate
27.43%
First Place
0.45%
Pick Rate
3.35
Avg Place
71.15%
Win Rate
25.52%
First Place
0.44%
Pick Rate
3.26
Avg Place
73.06%
Win Rate
23.94%
First Place
0.31%
Pick Rate
2.80
Avg Place
80.92%
Win Rate
33.06%
First Place
0.30%
Pick Rate
3.96
Avg Place
59.66%
Win Rate
15.87%
First Place
0.29%
Pick Rate
2.87
Avg Place
83.57%
Win Rate
22.91%
First Place
0.28%
Pick Rate
3.01
Avg Place
78.82%
Win Rate
25.12%
First Place
0.26%
Pick Rate
-
3.30
Avg Place
72.88%
Win Rate
22.99%
First Place
0.23%
Pick Rate
3.01
Avg Place
77.17%
Win Rate
31.08%
First Place
0.20%
Pick Rate
2.73
Avg Place
81.19%
Win Rate
34.02%
First Place
0.18%
Pick Rate
3.01
Avg Place
76.88%
Win Rate
30.40%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
3.24
Avg Place
73.67%
Win Rate
27.56%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
3.51
Avg Place
71.91%
Win Rate
15.30%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
2.43
Avg Place
89.84%
Win Rate
30.90%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
4.12
Avg Place
58.39%
Win Rate
11.19%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
3.36
Avg Place
71.90%
Win Rate
22.77%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
3.12
Avg Place
73.65%
Win Rate
30.39%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
4.03
Avg Place
62.42%
Win Rate
10.09%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.04
Avg Place
77.18%
Win Rate
27.51%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.29
Avg Place
71.79%
Win Rate
18.75%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
4.36
Avg Place
50.27%
Win Rate
7.47%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
-
3.41
Avg Place
73.19%
Win Rate
16.53%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
2.43
Avg Place
86.00%
Win Rate
38.51%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
3.42
Avg Place
74.27%
Win Rate
19.69%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
2.37
Avg Place
93.19%
Win Rate
23.47%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
2.90
Avg Place
78.85%
Win Rate
31.07%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.33
Avg Place
75.99%
Win Rate
21.11%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.00
Avg Place
77.43%
Win Rate
26.57%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.54
Avg Place
37.50%
Win Rate
4.17%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.52
Avg Place
72.30%
Win Rate
11.95%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.01
Avg Place
80.71%
Win Rate
22.55%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.25
Avg Place
72.32%
Win Rate
24.40%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.39
Avg Place
78.12%
Win Rate
12.46%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.63
Avg Place
48.77%
Win Rate
6.13%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.00
Avg Place
90.67%
Win Rate
45.33%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.15
Avg Place
74.29%
Win Rate
26.33%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
3.23
Avg Place
76.36%
Win Rate
20.00%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.49
Avg Place
45.89%
Win Rate
5.70%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.95
Avg Place
36.71%
Win Rate
5.70%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.05
Avg Place
86.36%
Win Rate
22.73%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.45
Avg Place
72.73%
Win Rate
13.64%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.41
Avg Place
71.15%
Win Rate
15.38%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.43
Avg Place
71.58%
Win Rate
20.00%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
-
5.52
Avg Place
28.16%
Win Rate
4.21%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.56
Avg Place
91.88%
Win Rate
24.35%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.37
Avg Place
71.85%
Win Rate
22.52%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.51
Avg Place
50.52%
Win Rate
7.22%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.55
Avg Place
82.61%
Win Rate
31.88%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.54
Avg Place
91.30%
Win Rate
31.88%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.98
Avg Place
77.21%
Win Rate
33.46%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.92
Avg Place
78.50%
Win Rate
31.06%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.65
Avg Place
45.05%
Win Rate
3.07%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.54
Avg Place
89.70%
Win Rate
29.09%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate

TFT Set 16 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions sorted by popularity to show what the meta is currently playing, based on 41.6K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.1% and average placement of 3.36 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Defensor/Disruptor with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 93.2% win rate. Following closely is Luchador/Protector at 91.9% win rate, and Herrero/Defensor at 91.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Defensor/Disruptor (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Zoe
  • Luchador/Protector (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Sion
  • Herrero/Defensor (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jinx

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Luchador/Defensor which achieves first place in 45.3% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Luchador/Defensor offers the best average placement at 2.00.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Defensor/Disruptor: 93.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Luchador/Protector: 91.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Herrero/Defensor: 91.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Herrero/Cosechador with a 1.0% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 78.6% win rate despite high contestation. Defensor/Demacia follows at 0.5% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

FAQ de Comps TFT Set 16

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16 es Defensor/Disruptor con Zoe como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 93.2% y una posición promedio de 2.37. Esta composición es efectiva para subir en clasificatoria y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo juego la composición Defensor/Disruptor?

Para jugar Defensor/Disruptor, concéntrate en construir alrededor de Zoe como tu carry principal. Busca Zoe y unidades de apoyo temprano, prioriza objetos que tengan sinergia con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, lo que la convierte en una opción relativamente sin competencia.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 16?

Para ganancias de LP consistentes en TFT Set 16, Luchador/Defensor ofrece la mejor posición promedio en 2.00. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Defensor/Disruptor (2.37 avg) y Forjador de estrellas/Defensor (2.43 avg). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan los finales en bottom 4 y proporcionan un ascenso constante.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Defensor/Disruptor es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 93.2% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Poca competencia significa que puedes encontrar tus unidades naturalmente sin tener que forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo debo forzar una composición vs jugar flexible en TFT Set 16?

En TFT Set 16, Herrero/Cosechador tiene una tasa de selección del 1.0%, lo que significa que está muy disputada. Si ves que otros la están jugando, considera flexear hacia alternativas como Defensor/Disruptor. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos tempranos, o cuando no esté disputada. Flexea cuando veas 2+ jugadores compitiendo por las mismas unidades.

¿Cuál es el meta actual de TFT en TFT Set 16?

El meta de TFT Set 16 está dominado por Herrero/Cosechador con 1.0% de tasa de selección, followed by Defensor/Demacia at 0.5%. Las composiciones con alta tasa de selección definen el meta pero suelen estar disputadas. Para partidas sin competencia, considera alternativas menos populares como Defensor/Freljord (0.1% pick rate).

¿Debería evitar jugar composiciones populares en TFT?

No necesariamente. Las composiciones populares como Herrero/Cosechador (1.0% de tasa de selección) son populares por una razón—son fuertes. Sin embargo, cuando varios jugadores disputan la misma composición, la posición de todos sufre. Observa tu lobby temprano. Si 2+ jugadores están forzando la misma composición, pivotea hacia alternativas para evitar pelear por unidades.