Composiciones TFT Double Up con mayor tasa de victoria

Esta tabla muestra las composiciones de equipo TFT Double Up con las mayores tasas de victoria, ayudándote a ti y tu compañero a identificar las mejores comps para subir de rango. Top composiciones Double Up de 9 campeones Set 17: N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg), Rogue (88.6% WR, 2.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler lidera con 97.87% de win rate y 2.19 de placement promedio. Replicator sigue con 88.68% de win rate. Analizando 88 composiciones Double Up de 9 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor comp TFT Double Up en TFT Set 17?

La mejor comp TFT Double Up en TFT Set 17 es N.O.V.A./Brawler con Viktor como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria de 97.9% y una colocación promedio de 2.19. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango con un compañero.

¿Cómo juego la comp N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up?

Para jugar N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up, coordínate con tu compañero. Concéntrate en construir alrededor de Viktor como carry principal. Esta comp tiene una tasa de selección de 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada. Coordina asistencias y objetos compartidos con tu compañero.

¿Qué comps de Double Up son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias de LP consistentes en TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler ofrece la mejor colocación promedio en 2.19. Otras opciones fiables incluyen Replicator/N.O.V.A. (prom. 2.46) y Dark Star/Brawler (prom. 2.52). Coordínate con tu compañero para evitar competir por las mismas unidades.

¿Cuál es la comp TFT Double Up más fácil de jugar?

N.O.V.A./Brawler es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 97.9% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Mi compañero y yo deberíamos jugar la misma comp en Double Up?

En TFT Set 17 Double Up, generalmente es mejor jugar comps diferentes para evitar competir por unidades. Challenger/Rogue es la más popular con 1.3% de tasa de selección. Considera que tu compañero juegue N.O.V.A./Brawler como opción complementaria.