Brandvs Samira
Brand vs Samira es un matchup a decisive en LoL parche 26.4. Brand gana con un 58.2% de win rate (+16.4%) sobre Samira basado en 67 partidas. Brand holds the advantage in both the early and late game. A continuación encontrarás el mejor build, runas, estadísticas de línea y estrategias de Brand para el matchup Brand vs Samira.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Samira(58.2%)Who Wins the Brand vs Samira Matchup?
Resumen del enfrentamiento Brand vs Samira
El enfrentamiento Brand vs Samira es un enfrentamiento decisivo en el juego clasificatorio de League of Legends. Basado en 67 partidas recientes analizadas, Brand gana con una tasa de victoria del 58.2% comparado con el 41.8% de Samira, dando a Brand una ventaja de 16.4 puntos porcentuales. Brand domina en cada etapa — desde la línea temprana hasta los combates de equipo tardíos. Esta ventaja consistente hace difícil para los jugadores de Samira encontrar ventanas favorables, por lo que las estrategias dependientes del equipo y evitar confrontaciones en solitario son esenciales. La brecha estadística más significativa está en control de masas, donde Brand lidera por 1.3s CC/min — una diferencia que influye fuertemente en el resultado de intercambios y escaramuzas. Los jugadores de Brand pueden elegir con confianza contra Samira y jugar agresivamente desde el nivel 1. Busca establecer dominio de línea temprano a través de intercambios favorables y alejar a Samira del CS siempre que sea posible. Entender estas dinámicas del enfrentamiento es esencial para las decisiones de selección de campeones y la estrategia durante el juego al enfrentar a este oponente de línea.
Desglose de la fase de línea Brand vs Samira
Samira está favorecido durante la fase de línea contra Brand, ganando 4 de 5 categorías estadísticas clave. Samira tiene ventajas en farmeo, daño, ingresos de oro y sustain, haciéndolo el mejor en línea en este enfrentamiento.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand64.7%Samira35.3%Brand51.5%Samira48.5%Brand domina el juego temprano (primeros 15 minutos) con una comandante tasa de victoria del 64.7% — una ventaja de 29.4 puntos porcentuales sobre Samira. Este juego temprano desigual significa que Brand puede dictar el ritmo de la línea desde el nivel 1, controlando intercambios, estado de oleadas y prioridad del río.
En el juego tardío (25+ minutos), Brand toma el control con una tasa de victoria del 51.5%, liderando a Samira por 3.0 puntos porcentuales. Brand escala más efectivamente en combates de equipo y disputas de objetivos.
Brand mantiene la ventaja en cada etapa del juego, haciendo este un enfrentamiento consistentemente favorable desde la línea hasta los combates de equipo tardíos. Los jugadores de Samira deben buscar jugadas superiores, estrategias dependientes del equipo y capturas en lugar de depender del escalado para ganar este enfrentamiento.
Best Brand Runes Against Samira
Brujería
Precisión
Usar Brujería primario con Precisión secundario permite a Brand presionar su ventaja contra Samira, amplificando las fortalezas que hacen favorable este enfrentamiento.
Datos de matchup de Brand para el parche 26.4 de League of Legends. La tabla muestra la tasa de victoria, diferencia de oro y estadisticas de rendimiento de Brand contra cada campeon en la meta actual. Haz clic en cualquier nombre de campeon para ver un desglose detallado que incluye el mejor build de Brand, runas, estadisticas de linea y analisis de early vs late game para ese matchup especifico.
Oponente | Tasa de victoria | Partidas | CS/min | Daño/min | Oro/partida | TV Temprana | TV Tardia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.67% | 407 | 2.7 | 786 | 10,924 | 40.3% | 52.4% | |
| 47.76% | 380 | 1.7 | 804 | 9,693 | 50.6% | 45.7% | |
| 55.33% | 301 | 1.8 | 829 | 10,280 | 63.7% | 49.4% | |
| 57.69% | 263 | 6.4 | 1,018 | 13,060 | 56.1% | 58.8% | |
| 53.33% | 258 | 1.8 | 852 | 10,220 | 55.5% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 246 | 2.1 | 816 | 10,373 | 54.6% | 53.1% | |
| 46.44% | 239 | 2.2 | 808 | 10,604 | 49.4% | 44.8% | |
| 48.68% | 230 | 1.7 | 850 | 10,183 | 48.9% | 48.5% | |
| 47.00% | 221 | 1.7 | 821 | 10,045 | 55.4% | 41.8% | |
| 54.59% | 207 | 3.1 | 995 | 11,518 | 61.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.32% | 205 | 2.3 | 854 | 10,385 | 47.6% | 47.1% | |
| 59.20% | 201 | 5.9 | 1,010 | 13,263 | 62.2% | 57.5% | |
| 56.82% | 177 | 1.9 | 761 | 10,593 | 56.3% | 57.1% | |
| 52.35% | 172 | 5.7 | 958 | 11,558 | 47.1% | 56.0% | |
| 47.65% | 172 | 6.1 | 1,000 | 11,157 | 52.0% | 44.2% | |
| 49.10% | 168 | 5.4 | 978 | 11,845 | 37.5% | 56.3% | |
| 49.70% | 165 | 4.0 | 861 | 11,146 | 49.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 165 | 6.5 | 1,027 | 13,389 | 63.3% | 52.4% | |
| 49.69% | 163 | 6.2 | 970 | 12,581 | 51.5% | 48.4% | |
| 49.68% | 156 | 1.7 | 800 | 9,847 | 48.4% | 50.5% | |
| 52.05% | 146 | 3.3 | 791 | 10,610 | 46.4% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 144 | 2.7 | 825 | 10,639 | 40.7% | 49.4% | |
| 50.35% | 144 | 5.3 | 965 | 12,581 | 48.1% | 51.6% | |
| 50.70% | 143 | 1.6 | 896 | 10,652 | 51.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 1.7 | 786 | 9,878 | 50.0% | 42.5% | |
| 53.03% | 135 | 1.6 | 658 | 9,379 | 57.1% | 49.3% | |
| 53.73% | 134 | 1.6 | 716 | 9,411 | 63.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 134 | 1.7 | 889 | 10,127 | 48.3% | 51.3% | |
| 51.94% | 130 | 1.8 | 730 | 9,981 | 49.0% | 53.8% | |
| 49.61% | 130 | 1.8 | 784 | 10,276 | 54.9% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 126 | 6.3 | 971 | 12,730 | 55.3% | 58.2% | |
| 50.40% | 126 | 6.0 | 963 | 12,146 | 44.7% | 53.9% | |
| 53.28% | 123 | 6.5 | 1,039 | 12,936 | 63.3% | 43.5% | |
| 61.34% | 121 | 2.1 | 1,009 | 10,705 | 63.8% | 59.7% | |
| 58.47% | 119 | 2.4 | 864 | 11,317 | 53.3% | 61.6% | |
| 44.07% | 119 | 1.8 | 815 | 9,991 | 42.2% | 45.2% | |
| 48.25% | 114 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 11,237 | 44.7% | 50.8% | |
| 55.75% | 113 | 5.8 | 924 | 12,094 | 66.7% | 45.8% | |
| 49.53% | 108 | 6.5 | 1,023 | 13,419 | 45.0% | 52.2% | |
| 38.38% | 100 | 1.7 | 828 | 9,929 | 43.9% | 34.5% | |
| 51.02% | 98 | 4.9 | 848 | 10,583 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 60.87% | 93 | 4.3 | 959 | 11,910 | 63.4% | 58.8% | |
| 48.39% | 93 | 5.6 | 999 | 11,295 | 45.2% | 51.0% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.4 | 1,052 | 13,508 | 56.4% | 52.8% | |
| 51.69% | 90 | 1.7 | 875 | 9,848 | 57.1% | 46.8% | |
| 57.47% | 87 | 2.3 | 912 | 11,215 | 54.8% | 58.9% | |
| 40.48% | 84 | 1.9 | 840 | 10,135 | 48.4% | 35.9% | |
| 41.46% | 82 | 4.8 | 839 | 11,062 | 41.4% | 41.5% | |
| 51.85% | 81 | 6.6 | 990 | 13,548 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 51.25% | 81 | 6.1 | 927 | 11,807 | 51.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.50% | 80 | 1.9 | 863 | 10,571 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 50.63% | 80 | 4.9 | 873 | 11,167 | 46.1% | 55.0% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 5.5 | 967 | 11,937 | 57.6% | 45.6% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 1.7 | 771 | 9,851 | 58.8% | 55.0% | |
| 50.70% | 72 | 4.1 | 987 | 12,029 | 56.3% | 46.1% | |
| 52.17% | 70 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 11,834 | 34.6% | 62.8% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 3.3 | 868 | 11,837 | 48.1% | 45.2% | |
| 55.88% | 68 | 6.4 | 1,029 | 13,254 | 66.7% | 48.8% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 1.6 | 960 | 13,525 | 48.4% | 72.2% | |
| 56.72% | 67 | 6.4 | 926 | 12,896 | 58.3% | 55.8% | |
| 54.55% | 67 | 5.5 | 1,036 | 11,772 | 48.0% | 58.5% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 6.3 | 1,045 | 12,935 | 64.7% | 51.5% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,073 | 13,372 | 50.0% | 51.2% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.3 | 965 | 12,240 | 48.5% | 39.4% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 1.3 | 814 | 12,719 | 39.3% | 55.3% | |
| 54.55% | 66 | 6.6 | 1,081 | 13,235 | 68.8% | 41.2% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 4.7 | 908 | 10,613 | 38.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.67% | 60 | 3.0 | 963 | 12,139 | 65.0% | 60.0% | |
| 49.15% | 60 | 5.6 | 924 | 12,007 | 52.4% | 47.4% | |
| 62.50% | 58 | 4.4 | 987 | 11,654 | 53.3% | 73.1% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 6.0 | 965 | 12,109 | 55.0% | 41.7% | |
| 55.77% | 53 | 4.5 | 1,010 | 11,521 | 52.2% | 58.6% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 4.2 | 918 | 10,789 | 56.5% | 43.3% | |
| 37.25% | 52 | 1.9 | 911 | 12,265 | 60.0% | 27.8% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 1.4 | 792 | 12,122 | 53.6% | 66.7% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 4.9 | 803 | 11,016 | 33.3% | 53.6% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 3.0 | 899 | 10,854 | 47.8% | 41.4% | |
| 41.18% | 51 | 1.3 | 885 | 11,920 | 40.9% | 41.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 2.1 | 1,145 | 12,596 | 47.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.10% | 50 | 6.3 | 936 | 11,863 | 52.4% | 57.1% | |
| 61.22% | 49 | 5.6 | 971 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 65.7% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 1.6 | 851 | 9,954 | 63.2% | 30.0% | |
| 35.42% | 48 | 1.9 | 842 | 10,164 | 38.1% | 33.3% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 5.7 | 951 | 12,101 | 56.3% | 56.7% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.7 | 966 | 11,318 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 5.4 | 1,023 | 11,670 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 35.56% | 45 | 4.8 | 1,079 | 10,908 | 36.8% | 34.6% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.4 | 1,119 | 11,674 | 53.3% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.2 | 942 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 44 | 6.5 | 1,007 | 10,591 | 53.6% | 68.8% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 2.5 | 1,029 | 12,791 | 47.1% | 34.6% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 2.1 | 879 | 12,831 | 53.9% | 43.3% | |
| 56.10% | 42 | 5.6 | 1,064 | 11,788 | 43.8% | 64.0% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 1.1 | 834 | 12,997 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 5.7 | 943 | 11,993 | 40.0% | 38.1% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.7 | 875 | 12,691 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 1.9 | 972 | 12,467 | 46.7% | 60.9% | |
| 51.35% | 38 | 3.9 | 1,037 | 12,389 | 50.0% | 52.2% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 2.1 | 826 | 11,969 | 53.9% | 48.0% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.5 | 957 | 12,029 | 66.7% | 43.5% | |
| 41.67% | 37 | 6.5 | 1,043 | 11,585 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.2 | 847 | 11,649 | 41.2% | 50.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 3.8 | 1,121 | 11,708 | 33.3% | 56.5% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 5.0 | 784 | 10,330 | 23.5% | 55.6% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 1.4 | 869 | 12,903 | 30.8% | 57.1% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.8 | 858 | 12,329 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.4 | 886 | 13,391 | 10.0% | 63.6% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 5.7 | 953 | 12,847 | 55.6% | 65.2% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.6 | 828 | 9,665 | 70.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.5 | 1,004 | 12,105 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.9 | 1,018 | 13,625 | 36.4% | 68.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.0 | 880 | 11,960 | 56.3% | 35.7% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 3.5 | 932 | 11,572 | 64.7% | 61.5% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.8 | 1,006 | 11,242 | 66.7% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.2 | 1,204 | 13,601 | 69.2% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 4.9 | 1,123 | 12,779 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.9 | 916 | 12,132 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 2.0 | 869 | 12,382 | 38.5% | 71.4% | |
| 52.00% | 26 | 1.1 | 808 | 11,666 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 3.9 | 1,030 | 11,778 | 44.4% | 52.9% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 1.5 | 915 | 13,109 | 37.5% | 27.8% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 1.9 | 965 | 12,483 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 4.3 | 834 | 10,520 | 53.9% | 53.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.4 | 888 | 12,285 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.8 | 860 | 11,661 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.6 | 895 | 11,321 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 24 | 3.0 | 998 | 15,059 | 66.7% | 55.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 4.1 | 1,011 | 10,545 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 23 | 6.5 | 977 | 11,609 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 2.7 | 929 | 11,707 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.3 | 1,094 | 13,572 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.4 | 1,097 | 13,163 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.7 | 843 | 13,604 | 66.7% | 43.8% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.6 | 1,018 | 13,390 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.1 | 932 | 12,800 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 977 | 12,160 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 4.3 | 896 | 12,055 | 54.5% | 70.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 793 | 11,230 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 733 | 11,058 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 823 | 9,493 | 36.4% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 1,072 | 13,456 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 0.9 | 843 | 11,565 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 1.5 | 910 | 10,905 | 44.4% | 12.5% | |
| 73.33% | 16 | 5.8 | 1,005 | 10,955 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.0 | 1,053 | 11,588 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 744 | 10,371 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 922 | 10,798 | 62.5% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.4 | 841 | 11,211 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.0 | 791 | 11,166 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.3 | 981 | 14,201 | 66.7% | 87.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,657 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.2 | 1,082 | 10,583 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 61.54% | 14 | 3.8 | 1,017 | 11,040 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.7 | 950 | 14,075 | 33.3% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.7 | 892 | 11,626 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 8.33% | 12 | 3.9 | 938 | 12,297 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 1,025 | 12,367 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 949 | 8,008 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.2 | 899 | 12,347 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 787 | 9,849 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 927 | 10,638 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 676 | 10,179 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.9 | 988 | 13,008 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 943 | 11,191 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 979 | 11,710 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 881 | 11,851 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 1,011 | 11,464 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,068 | 11,518 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 754 | 9,963 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 949 | 10,426 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
Brand vs Samira - Preguntas Frecuentes
Como le va a Brand contra Samira en League of Legends?
Brand gana el matchup de Brand vs Samira con una tasa de victorias de 58.2% comparado con el 41.8% de Samira, una diferencia de 16.4 puntos porcentuales. Estos datos se basan en 67 partidas rankeadas recientes en el parche 26.4.
Como le va a Brand contra Samira en el early game?
En el early game, Brand tiene la ventaja contra Samira con una tasa de victorias de 64.7% versus 35.3%. Los jugadores de Brand deben presionar su ventaja en linea a traves de trades agresivos y control de oleada durante los primeros 15 minutos.
Como le va a Brand contra Samira en el late game?
En el late game, Brand toma el control del matchup Brand vs Samira con una tasa de victorias de 51.5% comparado con 48.5%. Brand escala mejor en peleas de equipo y disputas de objetivos despues de los 25 minutos.
Quien gana el matchup de Brand vs Samira?
Brand gana el matchup contra Samira con una tasa de victorias de 58.2% en el parche 26.4 de League of Legends. La ventaja de 16.4 puntos porcentuales significa que Brand esta significantly favorecido en este matchup de linea basado en 67 partidas analizadas.
Cual es el mejor build de Brand contra Samira?
El mejor build de Brand contra Samira incluye optimized core items. Revisa el desglose del matchup arriba para ver la ruta completa de objetos y el orden de build.
Cuales son las mejores runas de Brand contra Samira?
Las mejores runas de Brand contra Samira usan el arbol primario Brujería con Precisión secundario. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Brand vs Samira matchup. Mira el desglose completo de runas en la comparacion de matchup arriba.
Brand contraresta a Samira?
Si, Brand tiene un matchup favorable contra Samira con una tasa de victorias de 58.2%. Brand strongly counters Samira en linea basado en los datos actuales del parche 26.4.
Como juego Brand contra Samira?
Cuando juegas Brand contra Samira, aprovecha tus ventajas estadisticas tradeando agresivamente durante ventanas favorables. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Construye los objetos y runas recomendados para este matchup especifico para mejores resultados.