破败之王对阵 卡牌大师
破败之王 vs 卡牌大师在LoL版本26.10中是a decisive对线。破败之王以71.4%胜率(+42.9%)击败卡牌大师，基于7场比赛。破败之王 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到破败之王 vs 卡牌大师对线的最佳破败之王出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
破败之王 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 破败之王 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
卡牌大师(71.4%)Who Wins the 破败之王 vs 卡牌大师 Matchup?
破败之王对战卡牌大师对决摘要
破败之王对战卡牌大师在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据7场近期比赛的分析，破败之王以71.4%的胜率获胜，相比卡牌大师的28.6%，给予破败之王 42.9个百分点的优势。 破败之王在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使卡牌大师玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，卡牌大师领先0.6s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 破败之王玩家可以自信地选择对抗卡牌大师并从1级开始激进地游戏。尽早通过有利的换血建立线上统治权，并尽可能将卡牌大师从补刀中挤走。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
破败之王对战卡牌大师对线阶段分析
破败之王在对线阶段对阵卡牌大师时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。破败之王在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 破败之王 Build Against 卡牌大师
带链碾碎者是对抗卡牌大师的最佳鞋子选择，提供破败之王在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 破败之王对抗卡牌大师表现最好的核心装备是收集者, 不朽盾弓 和 海妖杀手。这一组合给破败之王提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装在2场比赛中达到稳固的50.0%胜率，证明它是面对卡牌大师时可靠的装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为破败之王对战卡牌大师对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
破败之王75.0%卡牌大师25.0%破败之王66.7%卡牌大师33.3%破败之王以令人印象深刻的75.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先卡牌大师 50.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着破败之王可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
破败之王在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有66.7%胜率——比卡牌大师高33.3点。长时间游戏强烈有利于破败之王，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
破败之王在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。卡牌大师玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 破败之王 Runes Against 卡牌大师
精密
启迪
使用精密主系配启迪副系允许破败之王压制对卡牌大师的优势，放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.10版本破败之王对线数据。下表显示破败之王对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括破败之王最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.97% | 361 | 1.0 | 696 | 12,955 | 55.1% | 47.8% | |
| 52.97% | 353 | 1.0 | 754 | 13,645 | 57.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.17% | 297 | 1.0 | 716 | 12,823 | 50.8% | 49.7% | |
| 48.99% | 296 | 1.0 | 714 | 13,048 | 47.4% | 50.3% | |
| 49.80% | 251 | 0.9 | 710 | 13,407 | 45.1% | 53.0% | |
| 51.79% | 224 | 0.9 | 688 | 13,562 | 53.3% | 50.4% | |
| 47.64% | 212 | 0.9 | 664 | 12,760 | 56.2% | 39.3% | |
| 43.07% | 202 | 1.0 | 727 | 13,458 | 46.5% | 39.6% | |
| 45.03% | 191 | 1.0 | 672 | 13,020 | 46.3% | 44.0% | |
| 50.92% | 163 | 1.0 | 695 | 13,823 | 47.5% | 52.9% | |
| 53.38% | 148 | 1.0 | 788 | 13,085 | 56.7% | 50.6% | |
| 41.13% | 124 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,568 | 40.0% | 42.2% | |
| 45.83% | 120 | 1.0 | 763 | 13,831 | 53.1% | 40.9% | |
| 48.28% | 116 | 1.1 | 738 | 14,154 | 52.3% | 45.8% | |
| 56.52% | 115 | 0.9 | 725 | 13,851 | 68.8% | 47.8% | |
| 42.86% | 112 | 0.9 | 616 | 13,177 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 46.43% | 112 | 1.1 | 670 | 13,120 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 56.07% | 107 | 1.1 | 715 | 14,071 | 51.1% | 59.7% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 1.0 | 729 | 13,843 | 46.5% | 61.0% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 1.3 | 722 | 13,043 | 47.7% | 51.8% | |
| 47.42% | 97 | 1.1 | 726 | 12,841 | 48.9% | 46.1% | |
| 52.81% | 89 | 1.0 | 738 | 13,479 | 46.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.57% | 87 | 1.4 | 717 | 13,085 | 42.1% | 57.1% | |
| 51.72% | 87 | 0.9 | 735 | 14,096 | 47.8% | 53.1% | |
| 49.41% | 85 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,784 | 42.2% | 57.5% | |
| 54.32% | 81 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,934 | 52.6% | 55.8% | |
| 59.26% | 81 | 1.0 | 698 | 13,675 | 57.1% | 60.9% | |
| 49.38% | 81 | 1.1 | 730 | 14,402 | 51.9% | 48.1% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 1.1 | 731 | 12,531 | 60.5% | 50.0% | |
| 56.16% | 73 | 1.0 | 723 | 13,714 | 67.7% | 46.1% | |
| 57.53% | 73 | 1.0 | 766 | 13,957 | 55.6% | 59.5% | |
| 53.13% | 64 | 1.0 | 795 | 13,018 | 46.7% | 58.8% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.0 | 691 | 14,234 | 58.3% | 52.6% | |
| 44.26% | 61 | 1.0 | 701 | 13,332 | 56.3% | 31.0% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 0.8 | 590 | 12,148 | 53.6% | 39.3% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 0.9 | 670 | 12,260 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.0 | 734 | 12,874 | 56.3% | 42.4% | |
| 39.58% | 48 | 1.1 | 746 | 12,088 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 34.09% | 44 | 1.3 | 579 | 13,692 | 30.8% | 35.5% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,799 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 0.9 | 655 | 12,772 | 40.9% | 42.1% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 704 | 14,271 | 50.0% | 57.7% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.1 | 654 | 14,073 | 62.5% | 45.8% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 1.5 | 705 | 14,015 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 0.9 | 598 | 11,728 | 47.4% | 43.8% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 0.8 | 603 | 10,990 | 44.4% | 53.3% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.6 | 811 | 13,123 | 66.7% | 35.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.8 | 641 | 11,751 | 53.3% | 41.2% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.2 | 775 | 14,971 | 81.8% | 45.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,655 | 33.3% | 76.9% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 1.0 | 665 | 13,018 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.0 | 684 | 13,802 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 917 | 15,200 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.4 | 755 | 12,850 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 70.83% | 24 | 0.9 | 768 | 14,142 | 90.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.2 | 658 | 13,011 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.0 | 739 | 13,414 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.3 | 716 | 11,886 | 53.9% | 57.1% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.6 | 693 | 14,436 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.4 | 738 | 12,448 | 60.0% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.4 | 581 | 11,229 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.1 | 590 | 14,150 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.3 | 577 | 9,502 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 2.1 | 1,027 | 14,753 | 50.0% | 81.8% | |
| 15.38% | 13 | 1.6 | 746 | 12,363 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.3 | 587 | 14,291 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.9 | 548 | 11,626 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.3 | 587 | 13,672 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 4.3 | 689 | 12,990 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.3 | 639 | 13,406 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 734 | 16,311 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.6 | 585 | 10,001 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 581 | 12,366 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 0.7 | 843 | 13,974 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 936 | 15,575 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.7 | 871 | 13,624 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 774 | 10,677 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 701 | 10,210 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.8 | 1,145 | 13,653 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 836 | 10,272 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.5 | 496 | 9,950 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.1 | 922 | 14,806 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.5 | 1,286 | 18,162 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.2 | 906 | 14,661 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 1,037 | 17,594 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 797 | 13,871 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 837 | 16,307 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 726 | 9,973 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 834 | 14,189 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
破败之王 vs 卡牌大师 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，破败之王对卡牌大师表现如何？
破败之王以71.4%的胜率赢得破败之王 vs 卡牌大师的对决，而卡牌大师为28.6%，相差42.9个百分点。该数据基于26.10版本的7场近期排位赛。
在前期，破败之王对卡牌大师表现如何？
在前期，破败之王对卡牌大师占有优势，胜率为75.0%对25.0%。破败之王玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，破败之王对卡牌大师表现如何？
在后期，破败之王以66.7%对33.3%的胜率主导破败之王 vs 卡牌大师的对决。破败之王在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得破败之王 vs 卡牌大师的对决？
破败之王在英雄联盟26.10版本中以71.4%的胜率赢得对卡牌大师的对决。42.9个百分点的优势意味着根据7场分析的比赛，破败之王在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗卡牌大师的最佳破败之王出装是什么？
对抗卡牌大师的最佳破败之王出装包括收集者, 不朽盾弓, 海妖杀手 with 带链碾碎者。This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗卡牌大师的最佳破败之王符文是什么？
对抗卡牌大师的最佳破败之王符文使用精密主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 破败之王 vs 卡牌大师 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
破败之王克制卡牌大师吗？
是的，破败之王对卡牌大师有利，胜率为71.4%。根据当前26.10版本数据，破败之王在线上strongly counters卡牌大师。
如何用破败之王对战卡牌大师？
当破败之王对战卡牌大师时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。