Statikk Shiv TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.40
1st Place
12.34%
Top 4 Rate
51.41%
Pick Rate
0.66%

Statikk ShivTFT Team Comps

Set 17
SetSet 17
Matches676,359
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJun 2, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 16.11. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Statikk Shiv as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 31 viable team comps currently building Statikk Shiv, with an average win rate of 48.28% across all compositions. The highest performing Statikk Shiv comp achieves a 80.33% win rate, primarily featuring Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler traits with Ornn as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Statikk Shiv is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

2.98
80.33%
22.58%
Low Contested Risk
2.99
78.41%
25.25%
Low Contested Risk
3.24
76.39%
18.50%
Low Contested Risk
3.37
72.18%
19.91%
Low Contested Risk
3.50
71.64%
15.67%
Low Contested Risk
3.59
70.87%
12.39%
Low Contested Risk
3.53
69.49%
16.84%
Low Contested Risk
3.71
68.39%
13.10%
Low Contested Risk
3.82
65.92%
9.24%
Low Contested Risk
3.63
65.53%
14.47%
Low Contested Risk
4.02
60.22%
16.13%
Low Contested Risk
-
4.29
54.55%
7.32%
Low Contested Risk
4.40
51.53%
9.33%
Low Contested Risk
4.48
50.53%
2.65%
Low Contested Risk
4.65
49.16%
3.03%
Low Contested Risk
4.74
45.33%
5.51%
Low Contested Risk
4.84
42.55%
10.91%
Low Contested Risk
-
4.86
41.92%
6.53%
Low Contested Risk
-
5.04
41.53%
3.39%
Low Contested Risk
4.89
41.09%
6.24%
Low Contested Risk
4.91
40.94%
6.85%
Low Contested Risk
5.17
36.02%
2.17%
Low Contested Risk
5.50
30.16%
1.13%
Low Contested Risk
5.51
29.58%
3.20%
Low Contested Risk
5.45
28.13%
5.29%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
25.98%
2.66%
Low Contested Risk
5.70
25.45%
0.40%
Low Contested Risk
5.69
25.03%
1.20%
Low Contested Risk
5.67
22.70%
2.01%
Low Contested Risk
5.84
22.37%
2.04%
Low Contested Risk
6.24
12.71%
1.53%
Low Contested Risk
2.98
Avg Place
80.33%
Top 4 Rate
22.58%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.37
Avg Place
72.18%
Top 4 Rate
19.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.50
Avg Place
71.64%
Top 4 Rate
15.67%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.59
Avg Place
70.87%
Top 4 Rate
12.39%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.71
Avg Place
68.39%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.82
Avg Place
65.92%
Top 4 Rate
9.24%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.63
Avg Place
65.53%
Top 4 Rate
14.47%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.02
Avg Place
60.22%
Top 4 Rate
16.13%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.29
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
7.32%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.48
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
2.65%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.65
Avg Place
49.16%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.74
Avg Place
45.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.84
Avg Place
42.55%
Top 4 Rate
10.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.86
Avg Place
41.92%
Top 4 Rate
6.53%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.04
Avg Place
41.53%
Top 4 Rate
3.39%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.91
Avg Place
40.94%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.17
Avg Place
36.02%
Top 4 Rate
2.17%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.50
Avg Place
30.16%
Top 4 Rate
1.13%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.51
Avg Place
29.58%
Top 4 Rate
3.20%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.45
Avg Place
28.13%
Top 4 Rate
5.29%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.70
Avg Place
25.98%
Top 4 Rate
2.66%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.70
Avg Place
25.45%
Top 4 Rate
0.40%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Statikk Shiv Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 17 achieves a 80.33% win rate with a 0.49% pick rate. This composition uses Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits and is picked in 0.49% of games featuring Statikk Shiv.

How many team comps use Statikk Shiv in TFT?

There are 31 viable team compositions that commonly build Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 17. Statikk Shiv appears in comps with an average win rate of 48.28% across 54,377 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Statikk Shiv most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 17 uses the Meeple, Fateweaver, and Voyager traits with a 2.42% pick rate. This composition achieves a 45.33% win rate and average placement of 4.74.

What traits work well with Statikk Shiv in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Statikk Shiv in TFT Set 17 are Challenger, N.O.V.A., Brawler, Marauder, Gun Goddess, Bastion, Redeemer, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Statikk Shiv team compositions.