- Avg Place
- 4.11
- 1st Place
- 13.03%
- Top 4 Rate
- 57.96%
Wit's End TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 640,518
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 6, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Wit's End in TFT Set 16.19. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Wit's End as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 40 viable team comps currently building Wit's End, with an average win rate of 58.82% across all compositions. The highest performing Wit's End comp achieves a 82.17% win rate, primarily featuring Defender, Elderwood, Lunar traits with Diana as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Wit's End is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.83 | Top 4 82.17% | First Place 29.07% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.87 | Top 4 79.70% | First Place 24.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 76.30% | First Place 26.60% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.16 | Top 4 75.69% | First Place 21.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 75.23% | First Place 19.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 74.13% | First Place 20.28% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 73.84% | First Place 22.62% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.39 | Top 4 73.75% | First Place 15.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.17 | Top 4 72.79% | First Place 29.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 72.16% | First Place 15.40% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 71.92% | First Place 10.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 71.83% | First Place 18.03% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 70.54% | First Place 11.88% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 70.05% | First Place 19.56% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.42 | Top 4 70.02% | First Place 17.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.63 | Top 4 69.90% | First Place 9.22% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 69.18% | First Place 10.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 69.09% | First Place 32.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.25% | First Place 9.85% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 64.08% | First Place 14.63% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.98 | Top 4 60.99% | First Place 9.06% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 60.77% | First Place 10.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.98 | Top 4 60.07% | First Place 11.31% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 55.42% | First Place 4.75% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.46 | Top 4 51.83% | First Place 6.48% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.54 | Top 4 50.26% | First Place 3.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.56 | Top 4 49.37% | First Place 6.06% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.58 | Top 4 48.07% | First Place 7.34% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.64 | Top 4 47.63% | First Place 7.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.77 | Top 4 46.89% | First Place 4.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.76 | Top 4 46.45% | First Place 4.37% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.70 | Top 4 44.93% | First Place 7.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.83 | Top 4 42.56% | First Place 3.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.94 | Top 4 40.76% | First Place 3.42% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.12 | Top 4 37.44% | First Place 2.36% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.16 | Top 4 37.10% | First Place 3.53% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 35.35% | First Place 4.83% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.43 | Top 4 31.44% | First Place 2.27% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.64 | Top 4 28.39% | First Place 2.25% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.71 | Top 4 27.37% | First Place 3.58% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Wit's End Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Wit's End in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Wit's End in TFT Set 18 achieves a 82.17% win rate with a 0.66% pick rate. This composition uses Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits and is picked in 0.66% of games featuring Wit's End.
How many team comps use Wit's End in TFT?
There are 40 viable team compositions that commonly build Wit's End in TFT Set 18. Wit's End appears in comps with an average win rate of 58.82% across 52,586 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Wit's End most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Wit's End in TFT Set 18 uses the Adaptor, Inferno, and Invoker traits with a 3.01% pick rate. This composition achieves a 49.37% win rate and average placement of 4.56.
What traits work well with Wit's End in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Wit's End in TFT Set 18 are Defender, Elderwood, Lunar, Rival, Executioner, Ravager, Spellweaver, Vanguard, Flora Fatalis, and Attuned. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Wit's End team compositions.