Ambessavs Aurora
Ambessa vs Aurora is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.9. Ambessa wins with a 57.1% win rate (+14.3%) over Aurora based on 7 games. Ambessa wins the early laning phase while Aurora scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup.
Ambessa Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ambessa performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Aurora(57.1%)Who Wins the Ambessa vs Aurora Matchup?
Ambessa vs Aurora Matchup Summary
The Ambessa vs Aurora matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 57.1% win rate compared to Aurora's 42.9%, giving Ambessa a 14.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ambessa controls the early laning stage, but Aurora outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ambessa needs to press advantages before Aurora reaches their power spikes, while Aurora should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 864 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ambessa players can confidently pick into Aurora and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Aurora away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ambessa vs Aurora Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Aurora, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ambessa Build Against Aurora
Immortal Path is the optimal boots choice against Aurora, providing the mobility and stats Ambessa needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ambessa against Aurora are Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc and Death's Dance. This combination gives Ambessa an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ambessa75.0%Aurora25.0%Ambessa33.3%Aurora66.7%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Aurora. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Aurora is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor Aurora, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Ambessa must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Aurora reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Aurora survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Ambessa Runes Against Aurora
Domination
Resolve
Running Domination primary with Resolve secondary allows Ambessa to press their advantage against Aurora, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Ambessa matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.9. The table below shows Ambessa's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.35% | 74 | 1.2 | 708 | 13,341 | 48.6% | 54.0% | |
| 53.73% | 67 | 2.4 | 792 | 12,567 | 56.7% | 51.4% | |
| 44.62% | 65 | 1.2 | 779 | 13,136 | 38.2% | 51.6% | |
| 47.46% | 59 | 1.2 | 611 | 11,930 | 38.7% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.2 | 809 | 13,351 | 48.0% | 51.7% | |
| 45.10% | 52 | 1.0 | 706 | 11,803 | 52.2% | 39.3% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 5.4 | 704 | 10,686 | 47.6% | 46.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.3 | 758 | 13,129 | 50.0% | 45.2% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 1.0 | 792 | 12,870 | 44.0% | 47.8% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 1.6 | 861 | 13,792 | 47.6% | 45.5% | |
| 41.86% | 43 | 6.2 | 858 | 10,431 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 1.4 | 790 | 13,087 | 66.7% | 31.8% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 3.4 | 850 | 12,114 | 47.4% | 45.8% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 6.5 | 860 | 11,217 | 47.4% | 36.4% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 5.6 | 833 | 12,458 | 47.1% | 33.3% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 1.3 | 742 | 12,858 | 35.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 1.2 | 808 | 12,990 | 27.8% | 54.5% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 5.3 | 883 | 12,076 | 21.4% | 64.0% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 1.2 | 818 | 12,825 | 57.1% | 58.8% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 4.5 | 1,282 | 12,665 | 58.3% | 52.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 5.8 | 900 | 12,003 | 37.5% | 52.4% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 4.9 | 898 | 11,657 | 50.0% | 58.8% | |
| 27.78% | 36 | 2.1 | 717 | 12,176 | 16.7% | 38.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 4.0 | 776 | 13,544 | 66.7% | 39.3% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.6 | 793 | 13,225 | 66.7% | 26.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.1 | 861 | 13,820 | 58.8% | 53.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 0.8 | 810 | 11,322 | 58.8% | 53.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.3 | 781 | 13,262 | 53.3% | 40.0% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 5.3 | 654 | 11,444 | 23.1% | 64.7% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 2.1 | 840 | 12,420 | 71.4% | 53.3% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 1.1 | 803 | 13,324 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.9 | 858 | 12,845 | 40.0% | 68.4% | |
| 32.14% | 28 | 1.8 | 703 | 12,903 | 33.3% | 31.3% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 6.7 | 885 | 12,650 | 90.9% | 56.3% | |
| 23.08% | 26 | 5.7 | 803 | 9,043 | 22.2% | 25.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 1.1 | 799 | 13,621 | 28.6% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 5.9 | 948 | 11,820 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.9 | 888 | 11,808 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 6.8 | 901 | 12,091 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 731 | 13,093 | 41.7% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 7.0 | 895 | 12,413 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.3 | 732 | 11,894 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.1 | 728 | 11,197 | 36.4% | 58.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.6 | 1,036 | 12,467 | 69.2% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.6 | 878 | 11,580 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 27.27% | 22 | 4.7 | 629 | 11,542 | 44.4% | 15.4% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.0 | 908 | 12,277 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.0 | 712 | 11,703 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 5.8 | 1,042 | 12,484 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 25.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 807 | 11,899 | 44.4% | 9.1% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 1,020 | 14,405 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.4 | 888 | 11,931 | 20.0% | 77.8% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.2 | 666 | 10,090 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 4.7 | 701 | 12,129 | 62.5% | 70.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.2 | 893 | 11,728 | 42.9% | 63.6% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.4 | 942 | 13,584 | 22.2% | 55.6% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.0 | 693 | 11,832 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.9 | 805 | 15,022 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.7 | 636 | 12,867 | 20.0% | 63.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.3 | 804 | 13,808 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.1 | 901 | 12,517 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 4.4 | 884 | 10,287 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.6 | 552 | 11,174 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 2.4 | 663 | 12,579 | 40.0% | 30.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.6 | 964 | 10,257 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.4 | 747 | 11,191 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.7 | 796 | 12,145 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.7 | 744 | 10,837 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 764 | 12,441 | 83.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 4.7 | 865 | 10,695 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.1 | 763 | 14,070 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.3 | 729 | 12,572 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.8 | 1,074 | 10,842 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 6.8 | 961 | 12,851 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 591 | 11,388 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.3 | 762 | 14,251 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 999 | 14,214 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 865 | 10,355 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 832 | 13,112 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.6 | 704 | 11,900 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.8 | 605 | 10,609 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.8 | 651 | 10,409 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 1,091 | 15,073 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 801 | 11,798 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.2 | 572 | 13,643 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.0 | 602 | 11,255 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 836 | 12,381 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.7 | 603 | 10,966 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.7 | 957 | 14,333 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 835 | 12,502 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 886 | 11,556 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 805 | 10,760 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 770 | 15,442 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.8 | 596 | 6,887 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.7 | 792 | 12,024 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.1 | 946 | 11,160 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 725 | 15,617 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 985 | 13,389 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 846 | 13,415 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 845 | 14,222 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 572 | 8,308 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ambessa vs Aurora - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ambessa do against Aurora in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to Aurora's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.9.
How does Ambessa do against Aurora in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Aurora with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ambessa do against Aurora in the late game?
In the late game, Aurora takes over the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Aurora scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Aurora with a 57.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.9. The 14.3 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Ambessa build against Aurora?
The best Ambessa build against Aurora includes Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc, Death's Dance with Immortal Path. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ambessa runes against Aurora?
The best Ambessa runes against Aurora use the Domination primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Ambessa vs Aurora matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ambessa counter Aurora?
Yes, Ambessa has a favorable matchup against Aurora with a 57.1% win rate. Ambessa strongly counters Aurora in lane based on current patch 26.9 data.
How do I play Ambessa against Aurora?
When playing Ambessa against Aurora, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.