- Win Rate
- 49.3%
- Pick Rate
- 1.5%
- Ban Rate
- 2.8%
Ambessa vs Renekton
- Patch
- 26.20
- Games
- 1,979
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Oct 11, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Ambessa vs Renekton is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.20. Renekton wins with a 54.7% win rate (+9.4%) over Ambessa based on 64 games. Renekton holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ambessa vs Renekton matchup.
Ambessa Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ambessa performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who wins Ambessa vs Renekton?
Ambessa wins 46.8% of these games. With this many games the true rate is most likely between 34.9% and 59.0% (95% range).
- Expected
- 49.2% From both champions' overall Top win rates
- Matchup effect
- −2.4 pts Observed minus expected
- Sample
- 62 games Lane: Top
- vs patch 26.19
- +3.9 pts Within normal patch-to-patch noise
Lane: Top · Ranked Solo/Duo & Flex · North America server · All ranks · Patch 26.20 · Oct 10 – Oct 11
Key takeaways
- Current data slightly favors Renekton, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Ambessa wins 46.8% of 62 games (95% range 34.9–59.0%).
- Both champions' overall Top win rates predict 49.2% for Ambessa; the result is within the margin of error of that, so this matchup mostly reflects the two champions' general strength.
- Renekton usually wins the lane: 1,157 gold ahead of Ambessa at 15 minutes on average (60 games with a 15-minute snapshot).
- Ambessa players pick Plated Steelcaps far more often against Renekton: 55.3% of their other Top games, 77.4% here.
How we calculate this
Games: ranked Solo/Duo and Flex games on the North America server from the patch shown. Remakes (games under 5 minutes) are excluded.
A game only counts when Ambessa and Renekton played the same position on opposite teams, so roaming, lane swaps within a team or a champion merely being in the same game never count as this matchup.
The 95% range is a Wilson score interval. Confidence comes from how wide that range is: within ±3 points is very high, ±5 high, ±8 moderate, anything wider low. Below 20 games a matchup is not classified at all.
Expected win rate combines both champions’ win rates in this lane (same games and filters) with the log5 formula: E = A(1−B) / (A(1−B) + B(1−A)). Matchup effect = observed − expected.
"What changes" compares Ambessa's choices in this matchup with the same champion's other games in the same lane, and lists a change only when it is at least 3 points and statistically significant (two-proportion z-test, |z| ≥ 2, 20+ games).
Results are not split by rank: the sample per rank is too small for honest per-rank matchup numbers.
Ambessa vs Renekton Laning Stats
At 15 minutes
Whole-game averages
Ambessa vs Renekton Win Rate by Game Length
Ambessa's win rate against Renekton by game length. The dot is the win rate, the bar its 95% range and the dashed line the champion's usual win rate at that length. Lengths with fewer than 25 games are left blank.
No game length stands out: Ambessa's results against Renekton in short and long games are within the margin of error of each other.
Ambessa vs Renekton Power Spikes
Who is ahead at each stage, measured from these games. A stage reads "Even" when the difference is inside the margin of error, and "Insufficient data" when there are too few games to tell.
- Lane (15 min)RenektonAmbessa gold at 15: −1,157
- First itemRenektonAmbessa: 13.4 min · Renekton: 10.9 min
- Games under 20 minInsufficient data
- 20–30 min gamesInsufficient data
- 30+ min gamesInsufficient data
What Ambessa Changes Against Renekton
Choices Ambessa players make noticeably more or less often in this matchup than in their other Top games.
Plated SteelcapsBootsUsually55.3%vs Renekton77.4%+22.1 pts41.7% WR here
Mercury's TreadsBootsUsually25.3%vs Renekton8.1%−17.2 pts
Flash + IgniteSummoner spellsUsually73.6%vs Renekton56.5%−17.1 pts48.6% WR here
Grasp of the UndyingKeystoneUsually41.1%vs Renekton58.1%+17.0 pts44.4% WR here
OvergrowthRuneUsually62.3%vs Renekton79.0%+16.8 pts38.8% WR here
ResolveSecondary treeUsually49.9%vs Renekton35.5%−14.4 pts50.0% WR here
Flash + TeleportSummoner spellsUsually23.1%vs Renekton37.1%+14.0 pts43.5% WR here
Usually34.4%vs Renekton21.0%−13.4 pts
Best Ambessa Build vs Renekton
Usual Ambessa build (Top)
87.5% win rate · 16 games
Against Renekton
Not enough matchup-specific build data: only 7 of 25 Ambessa games against Renekton carried a complete build, which is too few to recommend an item path from. Use Ambessa's standard build instead.
- Ambessa usually completes Eclipse first, at 13.4 min (median of 47 games).
- Renekton usually completes Eclipse first, at 10.9 min (median of 51 games).
- Skill priority: Q > E > W — the same as usual.
Builds are ranked by the lower edge of their win rate range, not the raw win rate, so a build seen in a handful of wins never outranks a proven one.
Best Ambessa Runes vs Renekton
Usual Ambessa runes (Top)
Grasp of the Undying
75.0% win rate · 16 games
Against Renekton
Too few games for a matchup-specific rune page yet — use the usual page.
Plan your Ambessa draft in Draft Lab
Draft Lab lays out both teams lane by lane with live matchup win rates, damage profiles and game-phase lean, and suggests picks and bans from current meta data.
- Full 5v5 draft board
- Lane matchup win rates
- Pick and ban suggestions
Ambessa matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.20. The table below shows Ambessa's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Other Ambessa Matchups
Hardest for Ambessa
Easiest for Ambessa
Win rate and games for each matchup. Lists are ranked by the edge of the 95% range so small samples cannot top them; matchups with at least 50 games only.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ambessa vs Renekton FAQ - Patch 26.20
Who wins Ambessa vs Renekton?
Current data slightly favors Renekton, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Ambessa wins 46.8% of 62 games (95% range 34.9–59.0%).
What is Ambessa's win rate against Renekton?
Ambessa wins 46.8% of 62 Top games against Renekton on patch 26.20 (95% range 34.9–59.0%). Based on both champions' overall Top win rates, 49.2% would be expected.
Does Ambessa counter Renekton?
Not clearly. Ambessa wins 46.8% of 62 games against Renekton, and the 95% range (34.9–59.0%) includes 50%, so neither champion reliably counters the other on current data.
Who wins lane, Ambessa or Renekton?
Renekton usually wins the lane: 1,157 gold ahead of Ambessa at 15 minutes on average (60 games with a 15-minute snapshot).
Does Ambessa outscale Renekton?
There are too few games of each length to tell yet.
When is Renekton strongest against Ambessa?
Renekton is measurably ahead in: Lane (15 min), First item.
What should Ambessa build against Renekton?
There are not enough games for a matchup-specific core, so use Ambessa's usual Top core: Eclipse, Spear of Shojin, Black Cleaver. The biggest change against Renekton: Plated Steelcaps (55.3% usually, 77.4% here).
What runes should Ambessa use against Renekton?
Use Ambessa's usual Grasp of the Undying page (Resolve + Inspiration); there are too few games for a matchup-specific page. The biggest change against Renekton: Flash + Ignite (73.6% usually, 56.5% here).