
Aniviavs Brand
Anivia vs Brand is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Anivia wins with a 54.8% win rate (+9.7%) over Brand based on 31 games. Anivia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Brand matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Brand Matchup?

Anivia vs Brand Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Brand matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 31 recent matches analyzed, Anivia wins with a 54.8% win rate compared to Brand's 45.2%, giving Anivia a 9.7 percentage point advantage. Anivia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Brand players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Anivia leads by 213 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Anivia players can confidently pick into Brand and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Brand away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Brand Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Brand
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Brand, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Brand are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 75.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Brand. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Brand matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Anivia and Brand, with Anivia holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Anivia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Brand. Extended games heavily favor Anivia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Anivia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Brand players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Anivia Runes Against Brand
Running Sorcery primary with Inspiration secondary allows Anivia to press their advantage against Brand, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.37% | 83 | 6.6 | 746 | 12,018 | 48.6% | 39.1% | |
| 38.36% | 73 | 6.7 | 750 | 11,258 | 38.7% | 38.1% | |
| 41.94% | 62 | 6.6 | 688 | 11,239 | 41.9% | 41.9% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.3 | 808 | 11,340 | 37.0% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 4.3 | 657 | 10,286 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 6.6 | 798 | 10,755 | 48.1% | 40.0% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 5.9 | 756 | 12,174 | 66.7% | 48.4% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 6.6 | 844 | 11,232 | 52.2% | 43.5% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 6.5 | 752 | 11,206 | 45.0% | 52.0% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.2 | 671 | 11,139 | 60.9% | 47.6% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 6.8 | 734 | 10,497 | 73.1% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.8 | 694 | 10,262 | 42.9% | 57.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 6.5 | 704 | 10,539 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 6.8 | 782 | 12,634 | 33.3% | 30.4% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.3 | 831 | 12,711 | 42.9% | 29.4% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.8 | 703 | 12,669 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.8 | 538 | 10,155 | 45.5% | 35.0% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 4.8 | 833 | 11,996 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.2 | 713 | 11,459 | 45.5% | 68.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.9 | 753 | 11,397 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.6 | 828 | 11,876 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.7 | 731 | 11,813 | 58.3% | 43.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.6 | 658 | 10,347 | 43.8% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 4.8 | 678 | 10,340 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.7 | 803 | 10,965 | 30.8% | 76.9% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.8 | 846 | 11,820 | 76.9% | 45.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.2 | 744 | 12,215 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.4 | 713 | 11,901 | 44.4% | 46.7% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.9 | 540 | 9,037 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.3 | 754 | 12,081 | 70.0% | 46.1% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.8 | 757 | 11,043 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.0 | 673 | 11,805 | 25.0% | 64.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.8 | 736 | 11,468 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.9 | 541 | 9,216 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 783 | 12,318 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 484 | 9,494 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 800 | 10,898 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.9 | 559 | 7,752 | 46.1% | 16.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 3.6 | 645 | 10,675 | 75.0% | 36.4% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 2.8 | 544 | 8,374 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 1.8 | 562 | 9,760 | 25.0% | 18.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.7 | 874 | 11,130 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 6.6 | 788 | 12,014 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.1 | 839 | 12,361 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 3.6 | 646 | 11,349 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.4 | 633 | 10,039 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 7.0 | 696 | 11,071 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.5 | 714 | 11,484 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 3.1 | 856 | 10,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.7 | 533 | 9,912 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.5 | 574 | 9,075 | 12.5% | 87.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 602 | 10,527 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 672 | 13,053 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.7 | 532 | 8,246 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.7 | 457 | 8,919 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.7 | 526 | 9,397 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 832 | 12,108 | 16.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.8 | 792 | 13,003 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.3 | 717 | 10,468 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.8 | 856 | 12,702 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 7.2 | 798 | 12,363 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 924 | 12,479 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.9 | 485 | 8,552 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 1,159 | 12,878 | 80.0% | 85.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 682 | 12,224 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 907 | 10,273 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 1,062 | 10,876 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.5 | 552 | 8,627 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.9 | 919 | 14,958 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.4 | 927 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.7 | 608 | 10,169 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 908 | 12,216 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.6 | 772 | 12,322 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 853 | 11,393 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.8 | 1,039 | 13,830 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 461 | 8,784 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 782 | 11,811 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 573 | 12,338 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.3 | 669 | 11,090 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 878 | 12,553 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.6 | 611 | 11,010 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 649 | 12,597 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 668 | 10,737 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 785 | 11,946 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.4 | 771 | 11,916 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,015 | 13,365 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.0 | 654 | 9,675 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.9 | 973 | 12,833 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.4 | 694 | 10,663 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.0 | 658 | 9,614 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 7.1 | 854 | 11,617 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 815 | 7,923 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 792 | 14,190 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 951 | 12,293 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 595 | 9,450 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 752 | 12,741 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 525 | 11,398 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 441 | 9,182 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 778 | 11,387 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 668 | 11,841 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 697 | 8,618 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 985 | 13,775 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 507 | 9,383 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Brand - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Brand in League of Legends?
Anivia wins the Anivia vs Brand matchup with a 54.8% win rate compared to Brand's 45.2%, a 9.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 31 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Anivia do against Brand in the early game?
In the early game, Anivia has the advantage against Brand with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Anivia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Brand in the late game?
In the late game, Anivia takes over the Anivia vs Brand matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Anivia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Brand matchup?
Anivia wins the matchup against Brand with a 54.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 9.7 percentage point advantage means Anivia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 31 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Brand?
The best Anivia build against Brand includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Seraph's Embrace with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 75.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Brand?
The best Anivia runes against Brand use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Brand matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Brand?
Yes, Anivia has a favorable matchup against Brand with a 54.8% win rate. Anivia strongly counters Brand in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Anivia against Brand?
When playing Anivia against Brand, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
