Aniviavs Tahm Kench
Anivia vs Tahm Kench is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Anivia wins with a 56.0% win rate (+12.0%) over Tahm Kench based on 25 games. Tahm Kench wins the early laning phase while Anivia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Tahm Kench Matchup?
Anivia vs Tahm Kench Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 25 recent matches analyzed, Anivia wins with a 56.0% win rate compared to Tahm Kench's 44.0%, giving Anivia a 12.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Tahm Kench controls the early laning stage, but Anivia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Tahm Kench needs to press advantages before Anivia reaches their power spikes, while Anivia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tahm Kench leads by 1,580 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Anivia players can confidently pick into Tahm Kench and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Tahm Kench away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Tahm Kench Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Tahm Kench, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, damage and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Tahm Kench
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Tahm Kench, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Tahm Kench are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Tahm Kench. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia44.4%
Tahm Kench55.6%Anivia62.5%Tahm Kench37.5%Tahm Kench dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.6% win rate — a 11.1 percentage point lead over Anivia. This lopsided early game means Tahm Kench can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Anivia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Tahm Kench. Extended games heavily favor Anivia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Tahm Kench must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Anivia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Anivia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Anivia Runes Against Tahm Kench
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Anivia to press their advantage against Tahm Kench, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.68% | 151 | 6.5 | 767 | 11,491 | 56.7% | 41.8% | |
| 43.51% | 131 | 4.8 | 671 | 11,020 | 35.1% | 50.0% | |
| 54.26% | 129 | 6.7 | 765 | 11,773 | 55.4% | 53.4% | |
| 52.50% | 120 | 6.6 | 721 | 11,161 | 52.6% | 52.4% | |
| 50.91% | 110 | 6.5 | 821 | 12,052 | 55.6% | 47.7% | |
| 46.73% | 107 | 6.0 | 749 | 11,168 | 46.1% | 47.1% | |
| 41.00% | 100 | 6.5 | 764 | 11,002 | 39.6% | 42.3% | |
| 39.53% | 86 | 6.6 | 617 | 10,515 | 46.7% | 31.7% | |
| 40.00% | 80 | 5.0 | 728 | 11,475 | 34.6% | 42.6% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 2.7 | 577 | 9,294 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 6.6 | 654 | 10,416 | 45.2% | 41.9% | |
| 51.39% | 72 | 6.5 | 783 | 11,364 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 6.5 | 729 | 11,605 | 50.0% | 43.9% | |
| 50.70% | 71 | 5.8 | 697 | 11,193 | 48.3% | 52.4% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 6.9 | 865 | 12,001 | 58.6% | 51.3% | |
| 47.69% | 65 | 6.3 | 839 | 10,997 | 46.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.46% | 59 | 6.0 | 711 | 11,782 | 40.9% | 51.4% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 6.3 | 764 | 12,154 | 43.5% | 42.9% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 6.4 | 840 | 12,339 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 6.6 | 726 | 11,180 | 56.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 6.3 | 687 | 10,748 | 42.3% | 40.7% | |
| 42.31% | 52 | 1.9 | 527 | 9,034 | 46.1% | 38.5% | |
| 61.54% | 52 | 6.4 | 795 | 11,839 | 71.4% | 54.8% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 6.5 | 653 | 10,556 | 56.5% | 50.0% | |
| 38.78% | 49 | 3.5 | 578 | 10,609 | 55.6% | 29.0% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 6.3 | 703 | 11,597 | 37.5% | 45.2% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.7 | 785 | 12,025 | 53.9% | 53.1% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 6.5 | 773 | 11,679 | 54.5% | 39.1% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 7.0 | 798 | 10,897 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.5 | 847 | 11,888 | 61.1% | 34.6% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 6.6 | 698 | 10,955 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 6.5 | 735 | 11,319 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 6.5 | 828 | 12,074 | 52.9% | 58.3% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 6.7 | 760 | 10,968 | 59.1% | 42.1% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.4 | 750 | 11,379 | 37.5% | 54.2% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 6.9 | 849 | 11,176 | 57.9% | 61.9% | |
| 36.84% | 38 | 6.3 | 741 | 11,261 | 23.5% | 47.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 1.9 | 576 | 8,730 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 6.9 | 824 | 10,924 | 57.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 5.7 | 753 | 11,492 | 50.0% | 45.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.4 | 798 | 11,768 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 2.0 | 640 | 10,493 | 52.9% | 47.4% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 2.4 | 591 | 9,672 | 40.0% | 42.1% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 2.0 | 577 | 8,986 | 56.3% | 18.8% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 4.4 | 667 | 9,918 | 71.4% | 58.8% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.1 | 780 | 11,324 | 46.1% | 61.1% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 7.0 | 710 | 10,773 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 5.2 | 677 | 10,746 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.6 | 896 | 10,906 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.4 | 726 | 10,338 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.2 | 841 | 11,853 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.6 | 780 | 11,538 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 6.2 | 837 | 12,361 | 80.0% | 63.6% | |
| 74.07% | 27 | 3.9 | 774 | 11,031 | 81.8% | 68.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.3 | 706 | 12,289 | 33.3% | 47.6% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 2.0 | 479 | 10,147 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 3.5 | 805 | 10,330 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 696 | 10,548 | 81.8% | 50.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 785 | 9,947 | 42.9% | 45.5% | |
| 72.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 551 | 9,819 | 83.3% | 61.5% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 802 | 11,925 | 36.4% | 57.1% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.9 | 499 | 9,800 | 44.4% | 73.3% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 7.4 | 749 | 11,521 | 66.7% | 26.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 2.2 | 530 | 9,295 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.8 | 962 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.3 | 811 | 11,208 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.3 | 997 | 11,345 | 62.5% | 21.4% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 7.2 | 682 | 10,768 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.0 | 696 | 10,354 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.1 | 861 | 9,724 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.2 | 1,064 | 10,636 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.5 | 554 | 11,106 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 832 | 11,637 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 675 | 9,795 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.5 | 717 | 10,463 | 57.1% | 58.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.3 | 845 | 9,470 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.0 | 605 | 9,827 | 72.7% | 42.9% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.1 | 697 | 11,321 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.3 | 669 | 12,007 | 60.0% | 61.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.6 | 614 | 7,949 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.7 | 681 | 10,196 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 6.9 | 827 | 12,322 | 87.5% | 66.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.4 | 592 | 9,752 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.3 | 775 | 12,107 | 87.5% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 507 | 9,386 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.6 | 883 | 11,003 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 759 | 12,154 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 557 | 11,024 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.6 | 654 | 9,530 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,077 | 14,552 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.8 | 740 | 10,993 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.1 | 755 | 10,130 | 20.0% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.9 | 684 | 12,794 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 7.3 | 772 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 11.1% | |
| 84.62% | 13 | 6.9 | 663 | 11,503 | 83.3% | 85.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 874 | 12,312 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 91.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 857 | 12,132 | 100.0% | 85.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 812 | 10,947 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.4 | 699 | 10,154 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.9 | 601 | 10,765 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.1 | 668 | 13,881 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.2 | 714 | 12,922 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 631 | 9,886 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.6 | 637 | 11,672 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 546 | 9,445 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 800 | 11,320 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 740 | 12,643 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 548 | 9,664 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,348 | 66.7% | 14.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 782 | 12,571 | 66.7% | 14.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 641 | 10,472 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.7 | 562 | 9,145 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.0 | 547 | 11,257 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 728 | 11,985 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 701 | 9,809 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.6 | 556 | 9,038 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.0 | 705 | 11,778 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 448 | 8,311 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.2 | 726 | 11,685 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.9 | 840 | 12,587 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.0 | 591 | 8,948 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 724 | 11,795 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.9 | 956 | 15,460 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.6 | 788 | 10,448 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.3 | 709 | 12,223 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.1 | 798 | 12,027 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 518 | 9,015 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 577 | 8,065 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 519 | 9,796 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 794 | 9,814 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 907 | 11,584 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 678 | 11,041 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 670 | 11,404 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 683 | 9,270 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Tahm Kench - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Tahm Kench in League of Legends?
Anivia wins the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup with a 56.0% win rate compared to Tahm Kench's 44.0%, a 12.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 25 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Anivia do against Tahm Kench in the early game?
In the early game, Tahm Kench has the advantage against Anivia with a 55.6% win rate versus 44.4%. Tahm Kench players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Tahm Kench in the late game?
In the late game, Anivia takes over the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Anivia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup?
Anivia wins the matchup against Tahm Kench with a 56.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 12.0 percentage point advantage means Anivia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 25 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Tahm Kench?
The best Anivia build against Tahm Kench includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Tahm Kench?
The best Anivia runes against Tahm Kench use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Tahm Kench matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Tahm Kench?
Yes, Anivia has a favorable matchup against Tahm Kench with a 56.0% win rate. Anivia strongly counters Tahm Kench in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Anivia against Tahm Kench?
When playing Anivia against Tahm Kench, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Tahm Kench. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.