Aniviavs Zed
Anivia vs Zed is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Zed wins with a 56.2% win rate (+12.3%) over Anivia based on 73 games. Zed holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Zed matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Zed Matchup?
Anivia vs Zed Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Zed matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 73 recent matches analyzed, Zed wins with a 56.2% win rate compared to Anivia's 43.8%, giving Zed a 12.3 percentage point advantage. Zed dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Anivia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Anivia leads by 1.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zed has a strong advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Zed overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Zed Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Zed, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Zed
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Zed, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Zed are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Zed. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Zed matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia45.2%
Zed54.8%Anivia41.9%Zed58.1%Zed dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 54.8% win rate — a 9.5 percentage point lead over Anivia. This lopsided early game means Zed can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zed is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 58.1% win rate — 16.1 points above Anivia. Extended games heavily favor Zed, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Zed holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Anivia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Anivia Runes Against Zed
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Anivia the best tools to compete against Zed in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.68% | 151 | 6.5 | 767 | 11,491 | 56.7% | 41.8% | |
| 43.51% | 131 | 4.8 | 671 | 11,020 | 35.1% | 50.0% | |
| 54.26% | 129 | 6.7 | 765 | 11,773 | 55.4% | 53.4% | |
| 52.50% | 120 | 6.6 | 721 | 11,161 | 52.6% | 52.4% | |
| 50.91% | 110 | 6.5 | 821 | 12,052 | 55.6% | 47.7% | |
| 46.73% | 107 | 6.0 | 749 | 11,168 | 46.1% | 47.1% | |
| 41.00% | 100 | 6.5 | 764 | 11,002 | 39.6% | 42.3% | |
| 39.53% | 86 | 6.6 | 617 | 10,515 | 46.7% | 31.7% | |
| 40.00% | 80 | 5.0 | 728 | 11,475 | 34.6% | 42.6% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 2.7 | 577 | 9,294 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 6.6 | 654 | 10,416 | 45.2% | 41.9% | |
| 51.39% | 72 | 6.5 | 783 | 11,364 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 6.5 | 729 | 11,605 | 50.0% | 43.9% | |
| 50.70% | 71 | 5.8 | 697 | 11,193 | 48.3% | 52.4% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 6.9 | 865 | 12,001 | 58.6% | 51.3% | |
| 47.69% | 65 | 6.3 | 839 | 10,997 | 46.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.46% | 59 | 6.0 | 711 | 11,782 | 40.9% | 51.4% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 6.3 | 764 | 12,154 | 43.5% | 42.9% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 6.4 | 840 | 12,339 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 6.6 | 726 | 11,180 | 56.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 6.3 | 687 | 10,748 | 42.3% | 40.7% | |
| 42.31% | 52 | 1.9 | 527 | 9,034 | 46.1% | 38.5% | |
| 61.54% | 52 | 6.4 | 795 | 11,839 | 71.4% | 54.8% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 6.5 | 653 | 10,556 | 56.5% | 50.0% | |
| 38.78% | 49 | 3.5 | 578 | 10,609 | 55.6% | 29.0% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 6.3 | 703 | 11,597 | 37.5% | 45.2% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.7 | 785 | 12,025 | 53.9% | 53.1% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 6.5 | 773 | 11,679 | 54.5% | 39.1% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 7.0 | 798 | 10,897 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.5 | 847 | 11,888 | 61.1% | 34.6% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 6.6 | 698 | 10,955 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 6.5 | 735 | 11,319 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 6.5 | 828 | 12,074 | 52.9% | 58.3% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 6.7 | 760 | 10,968 | 59.1% | 42.1% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.4 | 750 | 11,379 | 37.5% | 54.2% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 6.9 | 849 | 11,176 | 57.9% | 61.9% | |
| 36.84% | 38 | 6.3 | 741 | 11,261 | 23.5% | 47.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 1.9 | 576 | 8,730 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 6.9 | 824 | 10,924 | 57.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 5.7 | 753 | 11,492 | 50.0% | 45.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.4 | 798 | 11,768 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 2.0 | 640 | 10,493 | 52.9% | 47.4% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 2.4 | 591 | 9,672 | 40.0% | 42.1% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 2.0 | 577 | 8,986 | 56.3% | 18.8% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 4.4 | 667 | 9,918 | 71.4% | 58.8% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.1 | 780 | 11,324 | 46.1% | 61.1% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 7.0 | 710 | 10,773 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 5.2 | 677 | 10,746 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.6 | 896 | 10,906 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.4 | 726 | 10,338 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.2 | 841 | 11,853 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.6 | 780 | 11,538 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 6.2 | 837 | 12,361 | 80.0% | 63.6% | |
| 74.07% | 27 | 3.9 | 774 | 11,031 | 81.8% | 68.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.3 | 706 | 12,289 | 33.3% | 47.6% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 2.0 | 479 | 10,147 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 3.5 | 805 | 10,330 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 696 | 10,548 | 81.8% | 50.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 785 | 9,947 | 42.9% | 45.5% | |
| 72.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 551 | 9,819 | 83.3% | 61.5% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 802 | 11,925 | 36.4% | 57.1% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.9 | 499 | 9,800 | 44.4% | 73.3% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 7.4 | 749 | 11,521 | 66.7% | 26.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 2.2 | 530 | 9,295 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.8 | 962 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.3 | 811 | 11,208 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.3 | 997 | 11,345 | 62.5% | 21.4% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 7.2 | 682 | 10,768 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.0 | 696 | 10,354 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.1 | 861 | 9,724 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.2 | 1,064 | 10,636 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.5 | 554 | 11,106 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 832 | 11,637 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 675 | 9,795 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.5 | 717 | 10,463 | 57.1% | 58.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.3 | 845 | 9,470 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.0 | 605 | 9,827 | 72.7% | 42.9% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.1 | 697 | 11,321 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.3 | 669 | 12,007 | 60.0% | 61.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.6 | 614 | 7,949 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.7 | 681 | 10,196 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 6.9 | 827 | 12,322 | 87.5% | 66.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.4 | 592 | 9,752 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.3 | 775 | 12,107 | 87.5% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 507 | 9,386 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.6 | 883 | 11,003 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 759 | 12,154 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 557 | 11,024 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.6 | 654 | 9,530 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,077 | 14,552 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.8 | 740 | 10,993 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.1 | 755 | 10,130 | 20.0% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.9 | 684 | 12,794 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 7.3 | 772 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 11.1% | |
| 84.62% | 13 | 6.9 | 663 | 11,503 | 83.3% | 85.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 874 | 12,312 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 91.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 857 | 12,132 | 100.0% | 85.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 812 | 10,947 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.4 | 699 | 10,154 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.9 | 601 | 10,765 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.1 | 668 | 13,881 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.2 | 714 | 12,922 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 631 | 9,886 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.6 | 637 | 11,672 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 546 | 9,445 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 800 | 11,320 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 740 | 12,643 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 548 | 9,664 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,348 | 66.7% | 14.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 782 | 12,571 | 66.7% | 14.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 641 | 10,472 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.7 | 562 | 9,145 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.0 | 547 | 11,257 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 728 | 11,985 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 701 | 9,809 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.6 | 556 | 9,038 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.0 | 705 | 11,778 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 448 | 8,311 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.2 | 726 | 11,685 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.9 | 840 | 12,587 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.0 | 591 | 8,948 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 724 | 11,795 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.9 | 956 | 15,460 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.6 | 788 | 10,448 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.3 | 709 | 12,223 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.1 | 798 | 12,027 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 518 | 9,015 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 577 | 8,065 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 519 | 9,796 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 794 | 9,814 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 907 | 11,584 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 678 | 11,041 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 670 | 11,404 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 683 | 9,270 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Zed - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Zed in League of Legends?
Zed wins the Anivia vs Zed matchup with a 56.2% win rate compared to Anivia's 43.8%, a 12.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 73 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Anivia do against Zed in the early game?
In the early game, Zed has the advantage against Anivia with a 54.8% win rate versus 45.2%. Zed players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Zed in the late game?
In the late game, Zed takes over the Anivia vs Zed matchup with a 58.1% win rate compared to 41.9%. Zed scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Zed matchup?
Zed wins the matchup against Anivia with a 56.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 12.3 percentage point advantage means Zed is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 73 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Zed?
The best Anivia build against Zed includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Seraph's Embrace with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Zed?
The best Anivia runes against Zed use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 57.1% win rate in the Anivia vs Zed matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Zed?
No, Anivia struggles against Zed with only a 43.8% win rate. Zed has the advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Zed's lead.
How do I play Anivia against Zed?
When playing Anivia against Zed, play cautiously and avoid Zed's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Zed has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.