
Aniviavs Mel
Anivia vs Mel is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Anivia wins with a 55.8% win rate (+11.5%) over Mel based on 52 games. Anivia wins the early laning phase while Mel scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Mel matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Mel Matchup?

Anivia vs Mel Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Mel matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 52 recent matches analyzed, Anivia wins with a 55.8% win rate compared to Mel's 44.2%, giving Anivia a 11.5 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Anivia controls the early laning stage, but Mel outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Anivia needs to press advantages before Mel reaches their power spikes, while Mel should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Anivia leads by 299 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Anivia players can confidently pick into Mel and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Mel away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Mel Laning Phase Breakdown
Mel is favored during the laning phase against Anivia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Mel holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Mel
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Mel, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Mel are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 83.3% win rate across 6 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Mel. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Mel matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Mel. This lopsided early game means Anivia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Mel takes over with a 51.6% win rate, leading Anivia by 3.2 percentage points. Mel scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Anivia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Mel reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Mel survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Anivia Runes Against Mel
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Anivia to press their advantage against Mel, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.37% | 83 | 6.6 | 746 | 12,018 | 48.6% | 39.1% | |
| 38.36% | 73 | 6.7 | 750 | 11,258 | 38.7% | 38.1% | |
| 41.94% | 62 | 6.6 | 688 | 11,239 | 41.9% | 41.9% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.3 | 808 | 11,340 | 37.0% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 4.3 | 657 | 10,286 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 6.6 | 798 | 10,755 | 48.1% | 40.0% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 5.9 | 756 | 12,174 | 66.7% | 48.4% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 6.6 | 844 | 11,232 | 52.2% | 43.5% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 6.5 | 752 | 11,206 | 45.0% | 52.0% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.2 | 671 | 11,139 | 60.9% | 47.6% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 6.8 | 734 | 10,497 | 73.1% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.8 | 694 | 10,262 | 42.9% | 57.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 6.5 | 704 | 10,539 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 6.8 | 782 | 12,634 | 33.3% | 30.4% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.3 | 831 | 12,711 | 42.9% | 29.4% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.8 | 703 | 12,669 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.8 | 538 | 10,155 | 45.5% | 35.0% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 4.8 | 833 | 11,996 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.2 | 713 | 11,459 | 45.5% | 68.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.9 | 753 | 11,397 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.6 | 828 | 11,876 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.7 | 731 | 11,813 | 58.3% | 43.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.6 | 658 | 10,347 | 43.8% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 4.8 | 678 | 10,340 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.7 | 803 | 10,965 | 30.8% | 76.9% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.8 | 846 | 11,820 | 76.9% | 45.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.2 | 744 | 12,215 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.4 | 713 | 11,901 | 44.4% | 46.7% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.9 | 540 | 9,037 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.3 | 754 | 12,081 | 70.0% | 46.1% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.8 | 757 | 11,043 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.0 | 673 | 11,805 | 25.0% | 64.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.8 | 736 | 11,468 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.9 | 541 | 9,216 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 783 | 12,318 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 484 | 9,494 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 800 | 10,898 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.9 | 559 | 7,752 | 46.1% | 16.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 3.6 | 645 | 10,675 | 75.0% | 36.4% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 2.8 | 544 | 8,374 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 1.8 | 562 | 9,760 | 25.0% | 18.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.7 | 874 | 11,130 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 6.6 | 788 | 12,014 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.1 | 839 | 12,361 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 3.6 | 646 | 11,349 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.4 | 633 | 10,039 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 7.0 | 696 | 11,071 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.5 | 714 | 11,484 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 3.1 | 856 | 10,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.7 | 533 | 9,912 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.5 | 574 | 9,075 | 12.5% | 87.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 602 | 10,527 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 672 | 13,053 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.7 | 532 | 8,246 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.7 | 457 | 8,919 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.7 | 526 | 9,397 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 832 | 12,108 | 16.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.8 | 792 | 13,003 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.3 | 717 | 10,468 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.8 | 856 | 12,702 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 7.2 | 798 | 12,363 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 924 | 12,479 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.9 | 485 | 8,552 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 1,159 | 12,878 | 80.0% | 85.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 682 | 12,224 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 907 | 10,273 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 1,062 | 10,876 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.5 | 552 | 8,627 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.9 | 919 | 14,958 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.4 | 927 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.7 | 608 | 10,169 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 908 | 12,216 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.6 | 772 | 12,322 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 853 | 11,393 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.8 | 1,039 | 13,830 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 461 | 8,784 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 782 | 11,811 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 573 | 12,338 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.3 | 669 | 11,090 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 878 | 12,553 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.6 | 611 | 11,010 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 649 | 12,597 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 668 | 10,737 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 785 | 11,946 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.4 | 771 | 11,916 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,015 | 13,365 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.0 | 654 | 9,675 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.9 | 973 | 12,833 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.4 | 694 | 10,663 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.0 | 658 | 9,614 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 7.1 | 854 | 11,617 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 815 | 7,923 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 792 | 14,190 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 951 | 12,293 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 595 | 9,450 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 752 | 12,741 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 525 | 11,398 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 441 | 9,182 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 778 | 11,387 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 668 | 11,841 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 697 | 8,618 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 985 | 13,775 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 507 | 9,383 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Mel - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Mel in League of Legends?
Anivia wins the Anivia vs Mel matchup with a 55.8% win rate compared to Mel's 44.2%, a 11.5 percentage point difference. This data is based on 52 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Anivia do against Mel in the early game?
In the early game, Anivia has the advantage against Mel with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Anivia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Mel in the late game?
In the late game, Mel takes over the Anivia vs Mel matchup with a 51.6% win rate compared to 48.4%. Mel scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Mel matchup?
Anivia wins the matchup against Mel with a 55.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 11.5 percentage point advantage means Anivia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 52 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Mel?
The best Anivia build against Mel includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 83.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Mel?
The best Anivia runes against Mel use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Mel matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Mel?
Yes, Anivia has a favorable matchup against Mel with a 55.8% win rate. Anivia strongly counters Mel in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Anivia against Mel?
When playing Anivia against Mel, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
