
Cassiopeiavs Gangplank
Cassiopeia vs Gangplank is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Cassiopeia wins with a 80.0% win rate (+60.0%) over Gangplank based on 5 games. Cassiopeia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank Matchup?

Cassiopeia vs Gangplank Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 80.0% win rate compared to Gangplank's 20.0%, giving Cassiopeia a 60.0 percentage point advantage. Cassiopeia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Gangplank players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Gangplank leads by 429 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia players can confidently pick into Gangplank and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Gangplank away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Gangplank Laning Phase Breakdown
Gangplank is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Gangplank holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Gangplank
Gluttonous Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Gangplank, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Gangplank are Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Gangplank. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Gangplank. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Gangplank. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Cassiopeia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Gangplank players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Gangplank
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Cassiopeia to press their advantage against Gangplank, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.64% | 55 | 6.5 | 880 | 11,608 | 52.2% | 37.5% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 6.5 | 761 | 11,994 | 70.6% | 28.1% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 6.6 | 879 | 11,428 | 33.3% | 41.4% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 6.6 | 827 | 11,186 | 38.1% | 48.0% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 6.6 | 841 | 13,474 | 37.5% | 57.1% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 6.8 | 758 | 11,735 | 38.5% | 35.0% | |
| 34.38% | 32 | 6.4 | 788 | 12,384 | 18.2% | 42.9% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 6.2 | 733 | 12,418 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.0 | 778 | 9,822 | 52.6% | 63.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.8 | 748 | 11,371 | 57.1% | 53.3% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.8 | 855 | 11,653 | 54.5% | 35.3% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 5.9 | 832 | 11,050 | 41.7% | 56.3% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.4 | 717 | 12,015 | 18.2% | 62.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 6.7 | 982 | 12,337 | 60.0% | 58.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 852 | 11,665 | 25.0% | 52.9% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 790 | 10,690 | 75.0% | 61.5% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 6.2 | 849 | 10,299 | 21.4% | 60.0% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 6.5 | 843 | 13,004 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.7 | 819 | 11,301 | 61.5% | 40.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.0 | 851 | 10,832 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.6 | 1,034 | 11,668 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.7 | 937 | 13,454 | 40.0% | 47.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.7 | 751 | 10,924 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.4 | 920 | 12,366 | 14.3% | 64.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 7.2 | 957 | 12,646 | 37.5% | 61.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.9 | 962 | 12,716 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.8 | 749 | 11,780 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.2 | 854 | 14,496 | 66.7% | 23.1% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.6 | 779 | 10,176 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.7 | 976 | 11,299 | 44.4% | 37.5% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.8 | 801 | 10,089 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.6 | 968 | 12,583 | 80.0% | 41.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.4 | 879 | 13,338 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 7.0 | 863 | 10,619 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.1 | 639 | 10,724 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.8 | 792 | 10,076 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.5 | 710 | 10,602 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.0 | 724 | 11,920 | 42.9% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.1 | 855 | 12,746 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.2 | 805 | 11,885 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 773 | 11,211 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 7.2 | 930 | 12,177 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.9 | 771 | 12,084 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.0 | 565 | 10,478 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.0 | 663 | 9,961 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 959 | 12,913 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.4 | 761 | 12,494 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.1 | 715 | 10,738 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 1,032 | 11,069 | 16.7% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 848 | 12,722 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.3 | 669 | 10,664 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.8 | 772 | 8,612 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 921 | 13,577 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.1 | 768 | 10,021 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.7 | 788 | 12,835 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 804 | 13,869 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 727 | 11,011 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.6 | 1,036 | 11,321 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 893 | 10,327 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.7 | 862 | 11,058 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.6 | 842 | 10,940 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.3 | 584 | 12,354 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.9 | 846 | 13,363 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.5 | 740 | 12,752 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.1 | 928 | 13,427 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.3 | 764 | 8,141 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.9 | 818 | 10,938 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 7 | 6.8 | 919 | 10,374 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 893 | 12,931 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 890 | 12,401 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 824 | 12,604 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 752 | 14,016 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.9 | 703 | 12,150 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 789 | 10,889 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.6 | 946 | 12,383 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.4 | 809 | 9,669 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 647 | 11,851 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 1,073 | 10,937 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.7 | 988 | 14,126 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 638 | 8,644 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.8 | 890 | 10,837 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 891 | 14,112 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 1,123 | 9,783 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 595 | 8,078 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 707 | 11,714 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 878 | 13,050 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 918 | 10,757 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 825 | 12,772 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 869 | 12,406 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,415 | 14,957 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 911 | 11,293 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Gangplank - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Gangplank in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to Gangplank's 20.0%, a 60.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Cassiopeia do against Gangplank in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Gangplank with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Gangplank in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Gangplank with a 80.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 60.0 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Gangplank?
The best Cassiopeia build against Gangplank includes Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Seraph's Embrace with Gluttonous Greaves. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Gangplank?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Gangplank use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Gangplank matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Gangplank?
Yes, Cassiopeia has a favorable matchup against Gangplank with a 80.0% win rate. Cassiopeia strongly counters Gangplank in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Gangplank?
When playing Cassiopeia against Gangplank, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
