Cassiopeiavs Gnar
Cassiopeia vs Gnar is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Cassiopeia wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Gnar based on 5 games. Gnar wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Gnar(60.0%)Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Gnar Matchup?
Cassiopeia vs Gnar Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Gnar's 40.0%, giving Cassiopeia a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Gnar controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Gnar needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Gnar leads by 391 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia players can confidently pick into Gnar and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Gnar away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Gnar Laning Phase Breakdown
Gnar is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Gnar holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Gnar
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Gnar, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Gnar are Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Gnar. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia0.0%Gnar100.0%Cassiopeia100.0%Gnar0.0%Gnar dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Gnar can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Gnar. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Gnar must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Gnar
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Cassiopeia to press their advantage against Gnar, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.4 | 848 | 11,970 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 35 | 6.7 | 869 | 10,932 | 31.3% | 26.3% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.7 | 880 | 11,397 | 42.9% | 55.0% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 6.6 | 739 | 11,596 | 61.5% | 40.0% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.6 | 823 | 11,356 | 46.1% | 56.3% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.7 | 922 | 11,739 | 45.5% | 64.7% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 6.1 | 709 | 12,084 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 762 | 12,197 | 75.0% | 35.3% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.7 | 877 | 13,417 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.5 | 749 | 11,491 | 22.2% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.2 | 801 | 10,503 | 40.0% | 83.3% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.5 | 785 | 11,634 | 37.5% | 78.6% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.9 | 867 | 11,812 | 20.0% | 58.3% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 844 | 11,524 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.0 | 772 | 9,855 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.4 | 823 | 10,954 | 28.6% | 41.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.0 | 762 | 11,988 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.8 | 1,030 | 11,691 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.3 | 862 | 10,543 | 27.3% | 85.7% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.5 | 837 | 12,266 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 7.0 | 853 | 11,074 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.7 | 685 | 10,789 | 37.5% | 62.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.2 | 777 | 9,761 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 7.4 | 842 | 12,029 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.5 | 973 | 12,031 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.8 | 842 | 11,244 | 62.5% | 71.4% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.6 | 663 | 10,495 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.7 | 897 | 11,422 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.5 | 843 | 14,399 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.4 | 974 | 13,196 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.4 | 819 | 12,877 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.8 | 807 | 11,377 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 983 | 10,896 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.5 | 798 | 8,013 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.7 | 750 | 10,311 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.5 | 1,070 | 13,152 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 928 | 12,502 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 951 | 12,296 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 709 | 12,032 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 1,021 | 14,444 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.7 | 778 | 11,015 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 914 | 12,478 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.6 | 664 | 9,943 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.3 | 833 | 10,946 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 730 | 12,565 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 792 | 15,107 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 806 | 10,694 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 937 | 11,123 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 772 | 11,655 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.7 | 687 | 10,858 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.1 | 642 | 11,786 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.5 | 714 | 12,955 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.1 | 734 | 13,027 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.3 | 993 | 12,207 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 0.00% | 7 | 7.2 | 850 | 12,028 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.7 | 950 | 9,396 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.7 | 837 | 13,612 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.8 | 899 | 13,057 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 800 | 10,458 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.7 | 722 | 10,563 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.5 | 739 | 12,091 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 974 | 15,514 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 1,106 | 10,452 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.9 | 975 | 13,737 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.6 | 782 | 11,734 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 888 | 10,696 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 711 | 7,502 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 716 | 10,081 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 629 | 10,932 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.7 | 826 | 11,766 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 891 | 11,901 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 827 | 11,932 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 869 | 12,342 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 8.0 | 906 | 11,070 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 845 | 8,556 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 937 | 13,629 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 793 | 13,498 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 1,142 | 10,330 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 703 | 13,789 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 1,113 | 11,889 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 8.1 | 788 | 11,460 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 946 | 13,607 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Gnar - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Gnar in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Gnar's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Cassiopeia do against Gnar in the early game?
In the early game, Gnar has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Gnar players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Gnar in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Gnar with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Gnar?
The best Cassiopeia build against Gnar includes Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Seraph's Embrace with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Gnar?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Gnar use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Gnar matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Gnar?
Yes, Cassiopeia has a favorable matchup against Gnar with a 60.0% win rate. Cassiopeia strongly counters Gnar in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Gnar?
When playing Cassiopeia against Gnar, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Gnar. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.