Fizzvs Lee Sin
Fizz vs Lee Sin is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 57.1% win rate (+14.3%) over Lee Sin based on 21 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Lee Sin Matchup?
Fizz vs Lee Sin Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 57.1% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 42.9%, giving Fizz a 14.3 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Lee Sin players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Lee Sin leads by 813 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Lee Sin and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Lee Sin away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Lee Sin Laning Phase Breakdown
Lee Sin is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Lee Sin holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Lee Sin
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Lee Sin, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Lee Sin are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Nashor's Tooth. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Lee Sin. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz57.1%
Lee Sin42.9%Fizz57.1%Lee Sin42.9%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 57.1% win rate — a 14.3 percentage point lead over Lee Sin. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Lee Sin. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Lee Sin players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fizz Runes Against Lee Sin
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Lee Sin, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.74% | 354 | 6.2 | 872 | 13,287 | 59.3% | 39.7% | |
| 54.60% | 348 | 5.9 | 838 | 12,613 | 60.6% | 49.5% | |
| 52.37% | 317 | 5.9 | 842 | 11,865 | 45.9% | 58.8% | |
| 54.98% | 271 | 5.8 | 865 | 12,715 | 57.3% | 53.4% | |
| 48.75% | 240 | 5.7 | 866 | 12,596 | 42.3% | 53.1% | |
| 51.48% | 237 | 5.8 | 869 | 12,743 | 55.9% | 48.1% | |
| 53.24% | 216 | 5.8 | 826 | 13,109 | 54.8% | 52.3% | |
| 54.50% | 200 | 6.2 | 876 | 12,270 | 57.5% | 50.6% | |
| 47.00% | 200 | 5.9 | 884 | 12,230 | 56.2% | 39.6% | |
| 45.03% | 191 | 5.9 | 728 | 11,611 | 43.0% | 46.9% | |
| 46.70% | 182 | 5.5 | 827 | 12,305 | 41.3% | 50.5% | |
| 53.93% | 178 | 6.0 | 828 | 12,665 | 61.1% | 49.1% | |
| 47.95% | 171 | 5.2 | 759 | 12,055 | 31.6% | 61.0% | |
| 53.25% | 169 | 5.2 | 825 | 12,330 | 51.9% | 54.4% | |
| 48.50% | 167 | 5.6 | 891 | 12,379 | 44.8% | 51.0% | |
| 46.71% | 167 | 5.9 | 798 | 12,378 | 50.7% | 43.6% | |
| 49.32% | 148 | 5.6 | 819 | 12,730 | 53.6% | 46.7% | |
| 53.74% | 147 | 5.5 | 829 | 12,759 | 58.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.21% | 145 | 5.6 | 841 | 11,686 | 50.0% | 43.0% | |
| 52.76% | 127 | 6.2 | 938 | 13,186 | 58.5% | 48.6% | |
| 57.80% | 109 | 5.8 | 845 | 12,538 | 51.1% | 62.9% | |
| 48.60% | 107 | 6.0 | 922 | 12,424 | 57.8% | 41.9% | |
| 51.46% | 103 | 6.0 | 830 | 13,325 | 60.0% | 44.8% | |
| 46.00% | 100 | 5.9 | 823 | 12,977 | 46.9% | 45.6% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.8 | 886 | 13,059 | 68.4% | 45.9% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.5 | 904 | 12,525 | 68.2% | 43.6% | |
| 55.10% | 98 | 6.1 | 944 | 13,881 | 68.3% | 45.6% | |
| 47.92% | 96 | 5.1 | 770 | 11,753 | 40.0% | 56.5% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 5.6 | 785 | 11,500 | 54.0% | 48.9% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,284 | 57.8% | 46.0% | |
| 52.22% | 90 | 5.9 | 916 | 12,834 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 59.30% | 86 | 5.8 | 891 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 65.4% | |
| 47.06% | 85 | 4.6 | 779 | 11,454 | 53.1% | 38.9% | |
| 46.43% | 84 | 5.7 | 799 | 12,111 | 41.0% | 51.1% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 5.9 | 855 | 11,914 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 58.90% | 73 | 4.9 | 882 | 13,332 | 56.7% | 60.5% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 6.0 | 872 | 12,201 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 6.0 | 842 | 12,569 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 59.26% | 54 | 1.4 | 750 | 13,673 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 6.0 | 831 | 12,529 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 6.0 | 831 | 13,353 | 53.3% | 53.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 5.8 | 1,028 | 13,097 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 2.3 | 824 | 13,552 | 65.0% | 52.2% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 5.7 | 896 | 13,117 | 55.6% | 44.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 5.3 | 820 | 11,402 | 57.1% | 51.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.2 | 862 | 13,791 | 56.3% | 45.8% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.8 | 850 | 13,231 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 40 | 5.9 | 830 | 13,651 | 81.8% | 58.6% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 1.8 | 727 | 12,896 | 57.9% | 36.8% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 1.0 | 711 | 13,709 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 2.4 | 901 | 14,237 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.3 | 815 | 12,855 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 5.7 | 873 | 12,352 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.6 | 714 | 11,086 | 52.6% | 64.3% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.9 | 820 | 13,011 | 38.5% | 63.2% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.2 | 890 | 14,941 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.3 | 823 | 12,241 | 38.5% | 52.6% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.3 | 858 | 13,232 | 33.3% | 63.2% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 6.1 | 844 | 12,528 | 64.7% | 78.6% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 6.0 | 858 | 13,454 | 53.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 4.9 | 886 | 12,911 | 40.0% | 52.6% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 5.6 | 937 | 12,724 | 50.0% | 65.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,986 | 25.0% | 52.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.9 | 793 | 12,990 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.9 | 622 | 11,888 | 63.6% | 46.1% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.0 | 980 | 13,322 | 45.5% | 75.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.1 | 730 | 14,773 | 33.3% | 64.7% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.0 | 970 | 14,611 | 66.7% | 56.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 5.4 | 909 | 11,229 | 12.5% | 61.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.8 | 738 | 14,226 | 37.5% | 53.9% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 797 | 14,234 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 4.9 | 866 | 11,714 | 28.6% | 46.1% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 922 | 10,514 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 4.6 | 918 | 12,432 | 77.8% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 4.5 | 910 | 14,857 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.8 | 847 | 11,395 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.2 | 827 | 12,353 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 1.5 | 688 | 12,688 | 72.7% | 83.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.9 | 940 | 13,764 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.9 | 886 | 15,205 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 4.4 | 695 | 11,282 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.8 | 752 | 13,859 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.7 | 601 | 10,025 | 55.6% | 71.4% | |
| 87.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 759 | 15,670 | 83.3% | 90.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.4 | 820 | 13,501 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 5.0 | 646 | 10,777 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.1 | 900 | 14,001 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.0 | 890 | 14,451 | 80.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.3 | 943 | 13,492 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.5 | 743 | 12,734 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 3.7 | 788 | 13,277 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.1 | 885 | 15,382 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.8 | 747 | 10,839 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.9 | 695 | 10,423 | 57.1% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 870 | 13,075 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 798 | 13,895 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.6 | 752 | 11,341 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.5 | 851 | 12,236 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.3 | 750 | 12,971 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.4 | 741 | 10,902 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.1 | 810 | 11,261 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.8 | 608 | 12,434 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.1 | 572 | 10,951 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.6 | 1,058 | 13,880 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 746 | 10,972 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 899 | 14,145 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.7 | 887 | 12,571 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 871 | 12,377 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.7 | 830 | 10,243 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.3 | 702 | 11,556 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 864 | 11,984 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.8 | 804 | 11,725 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.7 | 653 | 12,218 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.0 | 887 | 14,547 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 822 | 13,465 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 830 | 16,629 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 1,038 | 14,743 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 938 | 13,296 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.4 | 789 | 10,042 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 998 | 13,452 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.3 | 741 | 11,710 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 859 | 11,150 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 843 | 9,763 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 943 | 14,119 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 872 | 13,976 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.6 | 722 | 13,093 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 1,072 | 13,384 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.1 | 766 | 9,379 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 893 | 12,869 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 788 | 10,522 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.1 | 745 | 9,502 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 584 | 12,333 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 764 | 9,097 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Lee Sin - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Lee Sin in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Fizz do against Lee Sin in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Lee Sin with a 57.1% win rate versus 42.9%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Lee Sin in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Lee Sin with a 57.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 14.3 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Lee Sin?
The best Fizz build against Lee Sin includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Lee Sin?
The best Fizz runes against Lee Sin use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Lee Sin matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Lee Sin?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Lee Sin with a 57.1% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Lee Sin in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Fizz against Lee Sin?
When playing Fizz against Lee Sin, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.