
Fizzvs Wukong
Fizz vs Wukong is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Wukong wins with a 57.1% win rate (+14.3%) over Fizz based on 21 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Wukong scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Wukong matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Wukong Matchup?

Fizz vs Wukong Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Wukong matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Wukong wins with a 57.1% win rate compared to Fizz's 42.9%, giving Wukong a 14.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Wukong outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Wukong reaches their power spikes, while Wukong should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Wukong leads by 452 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Wukong has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Wukong overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Wukong Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Wukong, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Wukong
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Wukong, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Wukong are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Wukong. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Wukong matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Fizz and Wukong, with Fizz holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Wukong is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 63.6% win rate — 27.3 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Wukong, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Fizz has the edge early, but Wukong gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Fizz Runes Against Wukong
The Precision and Inspiration rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Wukong in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.24% | 369 | 6.1 | 819 | 12,543 | 45.2% | 50.8% | |
| 51.40% | 321 | 6.0 | 819 | 12,019 | 48.2% | 55.0% | |
| 47.33% | 243 | 6.2 | 844 | 12,846 | 54.8% | 41.7% | |
| 54.30% | 221 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,949 | 53.2% | 55.1% | |
| 55.90% | 195 | 5.9 | 906 | 12,621 | 55.2% | 56.5% | |
| 46.45% | 184 | 5.7 | 779 | 12,951 | 48.2% | 45.0% | |
| 51.65% | 184 | 5.5 | 790 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 52.35% | 171 | 4.5 | 747 | 12,163 | 45.5% | 58.1% | |
| 59.15% | 166 | 4.3 | 842 | 13,063 | 59.7% | 58.6% | |
| 56.52% | 161 | 6.0 | 866 | 13,291 | 55.6% | 57.3% | |
| 58.22% | 147 | 6.0 | 802 | 13,083 | 53.2% | 61.9% | |
| 55.32% | 141 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,958 | 50.0% | 59.5% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 5.8 | 750 | 12,622 | 58.2% | 48.8% | |
| 59.12% | 137 | 6.5 | 813 | 13,196 | 62.5% | 56.2% | |
| 52.59% | 136 | 6.1 | 759 | 12,033 | 57.6% | 47.8% | |
| 49.22% | 128 | 4.9 | 857 | 12,598 | 56.7% | 42.6% | |
| 54.40% | 127 | 4.3 | 803 | 13,532 | 55.7% | 53.1% | |
| 51.22% | 123 | 6.1 | 724 | 11,714 | 53.2% | 49.2% | |
| 41.67% | 121 | 1.3 | 705 | 13,048 | 37.5% | 45.3% | |
| 55.83% | 120 | 5.8 | 825 | 12,337 | 52.0% | 58.6% | |
| 55.08% | 118 | 6.3 | 941 | 13,041 | 70.2% | 45.1% | |
| 50.00% | 102 | 6.1 | 842 | 12,756 | 53.3% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 96 | 6.6 | 863 | 13,180 | 59.1% | 42.3% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 6.1 | 767 | 12,478 | 54.2% | 48.9% | |
| 42.39% | 93 | 1.5 | 720 | 13,466 | 41.7% | 42.9% | |
| 49.44% | 92 | 1.4 | 687 | 12,961 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 56.04% | 91 | 6.1 | 850 | 12,289 | 60.9% | 51.1% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 6.2 | 767 | 11,890 | 48.8% | 44.7% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 6.0 | 798 | 12,261 | 58.5% | 41.3% | |
| 38.37% | 86 | 1.0 | 667 | 13,001 | 33.3% | 42.0% | |
| 49.40% | 83 | 5.9 | 788 | 12,329 | 41.5% | 57.1% | |
| 49.37% | 80 | 5.2 | 862 | 12,847 | 53.9% | 45.0% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,325 | 38.9% | 53.5% | |
| 52.56% | 79 | 1.1 | 771 | 14,010 | 54.8% | 51.1% | |
| 51.28% | 78 | 1.6 | 790 | 13,999 | 54.0% | 48.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 1.7 | 764 | 13,083 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 5.7 | 754 | 12,164 | 50.0% | 45.3% | |
| 56.58% | 76 | 6.3 | 896 | 12,062 | 52.9% | 59.5% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 1.8 | 800 | 12,918 | 44.8% | 47.5% | |
| 59.02% | 63 | 3.7 | 775 | 12,343 | 62.5% | 55.2% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 6.1 | 889 | 12,483 | 65.4% | 48.6% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 4.4 | 809 | 12,648 | 66.7% | 38.7% | |
| 42.37% | 60 | 5.9 | 857 | 12,491 | 41.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.85% | 60 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,775 | 55.0% | 48.7% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 1.3 | 800 | 13,204 | 51.9% | 53.1% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 1.1 | 718 | 12,912 | 47.8% | 46.7% | |
| 51.92% | 53 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,626 | 60.9% | 44.8% | |
| 58.82% | 52 | 1.1 | 747 | 13,772 | 40.9% | 72.4% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.4 | 845 | 13,822 | 65.2% | 37.9% | |
| 53.06% | 50 | 1.2 | 835 | 13,393 | 65.0% | 44.8% | |
| 33.33% | 49 | 1.2 | 720 | 13,642 | 35.3% | 32.3% | |
| 50.00% | 49 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,459 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 29.79% | 48 | 1.2 | 747 | 12,634 | 30.4% | 29.2% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 1.3 | 828 | 13,831 | 41.7% | 41.7% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 1.9 | 801 | 14,003 | 45.8% | 63.6% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.3 | 828 | 13,489 | 44.4% | 63.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 5.3 | 853 | 13,207 | 65.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.8 | 652 | 12,035 | 36.8% | 43.5% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 1.4 | 769 | 13,128 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 1.3 | 739 | 12,058 | 46.1% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.8 | 832 | 14,857 | 63.6% | 44.8% | |
| 62.50% | 40 | 5.5 | 781 | 12,083 | 72.2% | 54.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.9 | 842 | 12,403 | 53.9% | 51.9% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 761 | 15,037 | 69.2% | 55.6% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.5 | 762 | 12,869 | 55.0% | 47.4% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.2 | 840 | 11,648 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 4.0 | 696 | 13,044 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 4.1 | 764 | 12,974 | 58.8% | 35.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 2.6 | 750 | 13,852 | 35.7% | 52.2% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 5.6 | 944 | 13,766 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 4.6 | 800 | 12,624 | 62.5% | 45.0% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,241 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 5.8 | 852 | 13,318 | 60.0% | 45.8% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 3.9 | 802 | 11,701 | 41.2% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.5 | 775 | 14,087 | 58.3% | 45.0% | |
| 67.74% | 32 | 5.3 | 782 | 13,111 | 61.5% | 72.2% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 2.0 | 834 | 14,050 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 783 | 13,525 | 53.9% | 38.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 5.5 | 817 | 11,348 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.3 | 766 | 15,397 | 71.4% | 47.6% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.2 | 789 | 12,815 | 42.9% | 30.8% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 4.8 | 777 | 12,473 | 90.9% | 56.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.1 | 680 | 13,576 | 46.1% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 816 | 14,253 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 1.9 | 699 | 12,777 | 53.3% | 20.0% | |
| 47.83% | 24 | 2.2 | 804 | 13,482 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.5 | 793 | 13,487 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.5 | 788 | 13,128 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 61.90% | 22 | 4.1 | 715 | 11,569 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 47.62% | 22 | 1.2 | 636 | 12,430 | 54.5% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 834 | 12,840 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.0 | 803 | 13,612 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.4 | 799 | 14,489 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 854 | 12,808 | 45.5% | 70.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 2.1 | 792 | 13,031 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 2.8 | 805 | 12,971 | 60.0% | 72.7% | |
| 36.84% | 20 | 1.5 | 585 | 12,767 | 23.1% | 66.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 781 | 11,683 | 52.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.6 | 774 | 13,331 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 18 | 5.9 | 967 | 12,533 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.2 | 922 | 13,413 | 77.8% | 55.6% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.2 | 745 | 12,401 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 17 | 5.7 | 890 | 13,685 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.5 | 876 | 13,455 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.3 | 876 | 11,808 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.5 | 805 | 12,087 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.8 | 706 | 12,581 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.9 | 761 | 14,095 | 83.3% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 747 | 11,660 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,896 | 33.3% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 13 | 5.8 | 849 | 11,394 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 787 | 11,704 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 854 | 12,529 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 968 | 11,781 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 717 | 12,662 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.5 | 830 | 12,565 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 858 | 13,266 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 781 | 12,828 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 734 | 10,226 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.0 | 939 | 12,468 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 829 | 12,939 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.1 | 780 | 13,079 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 744 | 13,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 9 | 1.2 | 672 | 12,677 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 848 | 13,422 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 691 | 12,493 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 654 | 11,213 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 755 | 15,214 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 844 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,700 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.3 | 1,055 | 13,918 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 703 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,069 | 14,765 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 639 | 11,309 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 879 | 14,052 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,690 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,996 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Wukong - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Wukong in League of Legends?
Wukong wins the Fizz vs Wukong matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to Fizz's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fizz do against Wukong in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Wukong with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Wukong in the late game?
In the late game, Wukong takes over the Fizz vs Wukong matchup with a 63.6% win rate compared to 36.4%. Wukong scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Wukong matchup?
Wukong wins the matchup against Fizz with a 57.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 14.3 percentage point advantage means Wukong is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Wukong?
The best Fizz build against Wukong includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Wukong?
The best Fizz runes against Wukong use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Wukong matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Wukong?
No, Fizz struggles against Wukong with only a 42.9% win rate. Wukong has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Wukong's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Wukong?
When playing Fizz against Wukong, play cautiously and avoid Wukong's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Wukong has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.