LeBlancvs Ambessa
LeBlanc vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. LeBlanc wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Ambessa based on 6 games. LeBlanc holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best LeBlanc build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup.
LeBlanc Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how LeBlanc performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Ambessa(66.7%)Who Wins the LeBlanc vs Ambessa Matchup?
LeBlanc vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, LeBlanc wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Ambessa's 33.3%, giving LeBlanc a 33.3 percentage point advantage. LeBlanc dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ambessa players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 890 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. LeBlanc players can confidently pick into Ambessa and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Ambessa away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
LeBlanc vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against LeBlanc, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best LeBlanc Build Against Ambessa
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats LeBlanc needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for LeBlanc against Ambessa are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives LeBlanc an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
LeBlanc50.0%Ambessa50.0%LeBlanc75.0%Ambessa25.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between LeBlanc and Ambessa, with LeBlanc holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
LeBlanc is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor LeBlanc, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
LeBlanc holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ambessa players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best LeBlanc Runes Against Ambessa
Domination
Resolve
Running Domination primary with Resolve secondary allows LeBlanc to press their advantage against Ambessa, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
LeBlanc matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows LeBlanc's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best LeBlanc build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.00% | 200 | 5.8 | 826 | 11,852 | 49.4% | 43.8% | |
| 45.77% | 143 | 5.6 | 829 | 11,421 | 46.7% | 45.1% | |
| 41.67% | 132 | 5.8 | 804 | 11,810 | 41.2% | 42.0% | |
| 54.39% | 114 | 5.7 | 882 | 11,519 | 63.3% | 47.7% | |
| 55.36% | 112 | 5.7 | 849 | 12,036 | 50.0% | 58.1% | |
| 49.11% | 112 | 5.1 | 826 | 11,349 | 41.3% | 54.5% | |
| 40.78% | 103 | 5.8 | 818 | 11,368 | 48.1% | 33.3% | |
| 59.00% | 100 | 6.0 | 824 | 11,132 | 59.1% | 58.9% | |
| 48.94% | 94 | 5.8 | 860 | 12,429 | 51.9% | 47.8% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 5.9 | 986 | 12,000 | 62.2% | 49.1% | |
| 45.98% | 87 | 5.3 | 846 | 11,522 | 51.5% | 42.6% | |
| 46.43% | 84 | 5.7 | 762 | 11,576 | 46.9% | 46.1% | |
| 48.15% | 81 | 5.7 | 790 | 11,577 | 36.7% | 54.9% | |
| 49.35% | 77 | 5.5 | 767 | 11,795 | 44.8% | 52.1% | |
| 44.74% | 76 | 5.9 | 957 | 11,923 | 51.4% | 39.0% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 5.4 | 772 | 11,399 | 48.1% | 39.5% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 4.8 | 879 | 12,075 | 56.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.33% | 60 | 5.6 | 803 | 10,788 | 42.3% | 35.3% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 5.9 | 913 | 10,839 | 51.7% | 56.7% | |
| 51.72% | 58 | 5.9 | 1,002 | 11,414 | 48.0% | 54.5% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.0 | 884 | 10,725 | 48.0% | 59.3% | |
| 48.08% | 52 | 5.8 | 937 | 11,461 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 5.8 | 823 | 11,385 | 52.6% | 39.4% | |
| 40.38% | 52 | 6.0 | 810 | 11,350 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.0 | 871 | 11,542 | 61.5% | 46.1% | |
| 32.65% | 49 | 5.6 | 867 | 10,937 | 22.7% | 40.7% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 5.7 | 831 | 12,118 | 62.5% | 28.0% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.1 | 942 | 11,704 | 59.1% | 42.3% | |
| 34.04% | 47 | 5.6 | 764 | 10,689 | 50.0% | 17.4% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 5.7 | 807 | 10,689 | 36.4% | 47.8% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 6.2 | 902 | 11,784 | 55.0% | 60.9% | |
| 34.29% | 35 | 5.4 | 891 | 10,673 | 31.3% | 36.8% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.0 | 1,086 | 12,726 | 50.0% | 52.4% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.6 | 966 | 11,976 | 47.1% | 58.8% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 5.0 | 820 | 11,435 | 43.8% | 43.8% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 6.1 | 985 | 12,295 | 64.3% | 64.7% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 6.4 | 1,001 | 12,401 | 92.9% | 52.9% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 4.3 | 920 | 12,192 | 61.5% | 64.3% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.0 | 854 | 10,935 | 53.9% | 57.1% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.6 | 812 | 10,116 | 63.6% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 5.7 | 819 | 11,721 | 70.0% | 20.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 976 | 13,007 | 70.0% | 46.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 4.4 | 834 | 11,332 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 21.74% | 23 | 4.0 | 715 | 11,212 | 20.0% | 23.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.5 | 674 | 10,512 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.5 | 723 | 9,931 | 63.6% | 30.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 961 | 11,639 | 42.9% | 76.9% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.8 | 867 | 11,934 | 33.3% | 61.5% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 2.3 | 788 | 12,425 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.8 | 953 | 11,816 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 83.33% | 18 | 6.4 | 932 | 13,335 | 83.3% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.7 | 749 | 11,868 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.6 | 1,002 | 10,902 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.3 | 866 | 12,785 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.9 | 775 | 9,885 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.1 | 850 | 11,992 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.8 | 757 | 9,805 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 2.0 | 724 | 11,393 | 40.0% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.7 | 1,014 | 11,483 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 4.6 | 815 | 12,591 | 16.7% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.9 | 885 | 11,208 | 60.0% | 44.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.4 | 774 | 8,504 | 71.4% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.0 | 773 | 12,499 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.1 | 930 | 12,756 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 778 | 11,924 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 663 | 11,679 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.6 | 607 | 8,530 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.7 | 635 | 10,039 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 2.6 | 850 | 11,580 | 75.0% | 71.4% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.5 | 1,011 | 13,541 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.5 | 809 | 12,521 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 10.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 903 | 13,101 | 0.0% | 14.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 749 | 11,106 | 100.0% | 14.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 779 | 11,409 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.7 | 693 | 9,285 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 683 | 9,933 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 671 | 9,497 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.8 | 1,046 | 11,866 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 908 | 12,264 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.7 | 1,059 | 9,808 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 951 | 11,715 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.8 | 1,115 | 11,308 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.4 | 802 | 12,551 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.2 | 711 | 9,348 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.0 | 858 | 10,972 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.0 | 719 | 9,620 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.3 | 869 | 12,164 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.7 | 572 | 8,410 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 786 | 9,927 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.1 | 886 | 11,429 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 867 | 11,131 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 949 | 11,529 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 888 | 10,934 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 859 | 12,879 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.8 | 618 | 10,667 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 808 | 13,895 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 834 | 10,604 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 641 | 9,845 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 638 | 11,602 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 943 | 12,699 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 704 | 9,964 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 700 | 8,719 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,170 | 13,495 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 928 | 12,576 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
LeBlanc vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does LeBlanc do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
LeBlanc wins the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Ambessa's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does LeBlanc do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, LeBlanc has the advantage against Ambessa with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. LeBlanc players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does LeBlanc do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, LeBlanc takes over the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. LeBlanc scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup?
LeBlanc wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means LeBlanc is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best LeBlanc build against Ambessa?
The best LeBlanc build against Ambessa includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best LeBlanc runes against Ambessa?
The best LeBlanc runes against Ambessa use the Domination primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the LeBlanc vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does LeBlanc counter Ambessa?
Yes, LeBlanc has a favorable matchup against Ambessa with a 66.7% win rate. LeBlanc strongly counters Ambessa in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play LeBlanc against Ambessa?
When playing LeBlanc against Ambessa, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.