Ambessavs LeBlanc
Ambessa vs LeBlanc is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. LeBlanc wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Ambessa based on 6 games. Ambessa wins the early laning phase while LeBlanc scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup.
Ambessa Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ambessa performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
LeBlanc(33.3%)Who Wins the Ambessa vs LeBlanc Matchup?
Ambessa vs LeBlanc Matchup Summary
The Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, LeBlanc wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Ambessa's 33.3%, giving LeBlanc a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ambessa controls the early laning stage, but LeBlanc outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ambessa needs to press advantages before LeBlanc reaches their power spikes, while LeBlanc should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 890 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. LeBlanc has a strong advantage in this matchup. Ambessa players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or LeBlanc overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ambessa vs LeBlanc Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against LeBlanc, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ambessa Build Against LeBlanc
Immortal Path is the optimal boots choice against LeBlanc, providing the mobility and stats Ambessa needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ambessa against LeBlanc are Voltaic Cyclosword, Hubris and Death's Dance. This combination gives Ambessa an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ambessa50.0%LeBlanc50.0%Ambessa25.0%LeBlanc75.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Ambessa and LeBlanc, with Ambessa holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
LeBlanc is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor LeBlanc, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Ambessa has the edge early, but LeBlanc gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Ambessa Runes Against LeBlanc
Domination
Inspiration
The Domination and Inspiration rune setup gives Ambessa the best tools to compete against LeBlanc in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ambessa matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Ambessa's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ambessa build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.86% | 107 | 6.6 | 911 | 11,271 | 39.6% | 49.1% | |
| 41.67% | 96 | 5.6 | 696 | 11,480 | 42.9% | 40.7% | |
| 44.68% | 94 | 5.4 | 809 | 11,195 | 46.3% | 43.4% | |
| 43.82% | 89 | 1.5 | 787 | 13,004 | 44.1% | 43.6% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 5.6 | 769 | 11,535 | 54.0% | 43.8% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 6.3 | 969 | 11,777 | 44.1% | 58.1% | |
| 54.05% | 74 | 2.0 | 821 | 12,959 | 46.4% | 58.7% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.9 | 737 | 12,106 | 35.3% | 52.5% | |
| 39.73% | 73 | 1.1 | 699 | 13,209 | 23.3% | 51.2% | |
| 54.17% | 72 | 1.7 | 772 | 12,960 | 51.7% | 55.8% | |
| 40.85% | 71 | 4.6 | 807 | 12,295 | 45.2% | 37.5% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 1.1 | 741 | 12,891 | 34.5% | 59.5% | |
| 52.31% | 65 | 6.4 | 817 | 11,368 | 48.0% | 55.0% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 2.7 | 904 | 12,834 | 48.4% | 52.9% | |
| 55.38% | 65 | 6.4 | 857 | 10,696 | 45.5% | 65.6% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 1.3 | 756 | 13,638 | 54.2% | 42.5% | |
| 57.81% | 64 | 5.5 | 930 | 11,885 | 56.7% | 58.8% | |
| 41.27% | 63 | 1.1 | 725 | 13,070 | 29.6% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 63 | 4.8 | 845 | 11,461 | 37.5% | 48.4% | |
| 49.18% | 61 | 6.4 | 812 | 12,309 | 44.0% | 52.8% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 6.3 | 860 | 11,128 | 37.9% | 60.0% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 6.6 | 1,097 | 12,647 | 52.6% | 40.5% | |
| 38.89% | 54 | 1.4 | 657 | 11,743 | 40.0% | 37.9% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 4.4 | 680 | 10,944 | 37.5% | 53.3% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 6.6 | 848 | 11,877 | 64.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 5.6 | 1,368 | 12,271 | 47.6% | 43.3% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 6.3 | 794 | 10,578 | 48.1% | 41.7% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 6.1 | 874 | 11,551 | 36.8% | 51.6% | |
| 36.96% | 46 | 6.5 | 906 | 11,569 | 44.4% | 32.1% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 2.6 | 719 | 11,534 | 42.3% | 63.2% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 6.3 | 821 | 11,089 | 33.3% | 68.2% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 7.2 | 926 | 11,481 | 45.5% | 47.6% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 5.0 | 1,007 | 12,612 | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 1.3 | 729 | 13,752 | 42.9% | 69.0% | |
| 64.29% | 42 | 6.4 | 892 | 11,927 | 52.9% | 72.0% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 3.3 | 702 | 13,182 | 66.7% | 26.9% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 2.5 | 837 | 12,284 | 47.6% | 60.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.2 | 858 | 12,806 | 52.4% | 55.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.6 | 812 | 11,148 | 47.6% | 57.9% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.8 | 922 | 11,543 | 53.3% | 56.5% | |
| 36.84% | 38 | 6.4 | 853 | 11,305 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 5.5 | 927 | 11,884 | 40.0% | 52.9% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 1.1 | 632 | 12,498 | 41.2% | 52.6% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 1.3 | 715 | 13,110 | 64.3% | 42.9% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.7 | 801 | 13,757 | 45.5% | 45.8% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 1.2 | 809 | 13,447 | 41.7% | 40.9% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 2.2 | 802 | 12,150 | 26.7% | 63.2% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.7 | 746 | 11,667 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 2.2 | 804 | 12,372 | 35.3% | 56.3% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 811 | 11,856 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.2 | 764 | 11,492 | 53.3% | 43.8% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 5.8 | 887 | 11,463 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 30 | 5.7 | 1,110 | 12,126 | 18.2% | 36.8% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 6.3 | 864 | 10,774 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 4.5 | 803 | 11,471 | 53.9% | 56.3% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 1.3 | 623 | 12,454 | 18.2% | 47.1% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.9 | 828 | 10,723 | 53.9% | 53.3% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 1.9 | 921 | 12,856 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.0 | 855 | 11,395 | 28.6% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.6 | 867 | 14,332 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 5.3 | 883 | 12,124 | 41.2% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 1.8 | 731 | 12,368 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 5.4 | 631 | 10,839 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 6.1 | 650 | 9,869 | 28.6% | 58.3% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 1.0 | 821 | 13,145 | 30.8% | 83.3% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.7 | 871 | 12,109 | 36.4% | 53.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.5 | 687 | 10,512 | 53.9% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.2 | 918 | 12,014 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 5.5 | 880 | 12,129 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.2 | 964 | 13,033 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.6 | 754 | 12,463 | 44.4% | 38.5% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.2 | 644 | 9,335 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.1 | 617 | 11,025 | 36.4% | 40.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.7 | 751 | 11,696 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 2.8 | 835 | 12,202 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.4 | 766 | 14,153 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 72.22% | 18 | 6.7 | 1,012 | 11,426 | 72.7% | 71.4% | |
| 72.22% | 18 | 1.4 | 736 | 11,958 | 71.4% | 72.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.4 | 836 | 10,548 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.4 | 734 | 12,102 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 822 | 12,376 | 71.4% | 22.2% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.0 | 777 | 13,249 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 777 | 13,522 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.4 | 971 | 12,693 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.5 | 671 | 11,785 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.0 | 641 | 10,456 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 731 | 11,715 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.3 | 886 | 9,505 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.6 | 746 | 10,806 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 685 | 12,473 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 990 | 14,619 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 520 | 9,382 | 28.6% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 801 | 12,818 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 725 | 10,802 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 875 | 11,872 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 938 | 11,208 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.4 | 891 | 12,777 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 866 | 11,257 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 762 | 12,309 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.7 | 735 | 13,514 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 563 | 9,482 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.3 | 974 | 9,933 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.5 | 789 | 12,502 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.7 | 976 | 14,797 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 6.9 | 630 | 11,733 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 545 | 11,234 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 742 | 15,018 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 727 | 11,224 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 909 | 11,782 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 699 | 10,798 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 601 | 8,239 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 941 | 10,833 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 793 | 8,629 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ambessa vs LeBlanc - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ambessa do against LeBlanc in League of Legends?
LeBlanc wins the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Ambessa's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Ambessa do against LeBlanc in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against LeBlanc with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ambessa do against LeBlanc in the late game?
In the late game, LeBlanc takes over the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. LeBlanc scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup?
LeBlanc wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means LeBlanc is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Ambessa build against LeBlanc?
The best Ambessa build against LeBlanc includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Hubris, Death's Dance with Immortal Path. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ambessa runes against LeBlanc?
The best Ambessa runes against LeBlanc use the Domination primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Ambessa vs LeBlanc matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ambessa counter LeBlanc?
No, Ambessa struggles against LeBlanc with only a 33.3% win rate. LeBlanc has the advantage in this matchup. Ambessa players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize LeBlanc's lead.
How do I play Ambessa against LeBlanc?
When playing Ambessa against LeBlanc, play cautiously and avoid LeBlanc's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since LeBlanc has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.