Tahm Kenchvs Aphelios
Tahm Kench vs Aphelios is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Tahm Kench wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Aphelios based on 5 games. Tahm Kench holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup.
Tahm Kench Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tahm Kench performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Aphelios(60.0%)Who Wins the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios Matchup?
Tahm Kench vs Aphelios Matchup Summary
The Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Tahm Kench wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Aphelios's 40.0%, giving Tahm Kench a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Tahm Kench dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Aphelios players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tahm Kench leads by 1,603 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tahm Kench players can confidently pick into Aphelios and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Aphelios away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tahm Kench vs Aphelios Laning Phase Breakdown
Aphelios is favored during the laning phase against Tahm Kench, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Aphelios holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tahm Kench50.0%Aphelios50.0%Tahm Kench66.7%Aphelios33.3%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Tahm Kench and Aphelios, with Tahm Kench holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Tahm Kench is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Aphelios. Extended games heavily favor Tahm Kench, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Tahm Kench holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Aphelios players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Tahm Kench Runes Against Aphelios
Resolve
Inspiration
Running Resolve primary with Inspiration secondary allows Tahm Kench to press their advantage against Aphelios, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Tahm Kench matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Tahm Kench's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.00% | 240 | 1.3 | 560 | 9,203 | 47.6% | 43.0% | |
| 51.63% | 215 | 1.4 | 577 | 9,820 | 47.2% | 54.8% | |
| 48.98% | 196 | 1.3 | 587 | 8,827 | 50.0% | 47.7% | |
| 48.00% | 175 | 1.2 | 553 | 9,203 | 49.5% | 46.4% | |
| 42.77% | 166 | 4.6 | 697 | 10,713 | 39.7% | 44.9% | |
| 51.25% | 160 | 1.4 | 580 | 8,752 | 45.0% | 57.5% | |
| 51.28% | 156 | 1.7 | 588 | 9,563 | 58.7% | 46.2% | |
| 48.68% | 152 | 1.3 | 563 | 9,202 | 46.6% | 50.6% | |
| 53.47% | 144 | 5.8 | 979 | 11,190 | 48.4% | 57.3% | |
| 41.96% | 143 | 1.3 | 587 | 9,564 | 45.3% | 39.2% | |
| 53.15% | 143 | 1.2 | 593 | 9,417 | 45.6% | 60.0% | |
| 49.19% | 124 | 5.1 | 810 | 10,778 | 41.5% | 53.0% | |
| 54.17% | 120 | 1.4 | 605 | 9,260 | 57.4% | 51.5% | |
| 50.43% | 117 | 5.2 | 944 | 11,709 | 39.0% | 56.6% | |
| 61.06% | 113 | 5.2 | 862 | 11,969 | 59.0% | 62.2% | |
| 53.98% | 113 | 1.3 | 575 | 10,025 | 58.7% | 50.8% | |
| 54.13% | 109 | 2.4 | 716 | 10,815 | 56.1% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 108 | 1.3 | 645 | 9,005 | 45.5% | 54.7% | |
| 46.15% | 104 | 5.2 | 870 | 11,123 | 42.2% | 49.1% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 1.3 | 599 | 9,314 | 61.7% | 34.1% | |
| 55.17% | 87 | 1.2 | 509 | 9,376 | 71.8% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 85 | 1.2 | 635 | 9,255 | 60.5% | 46.8% | |
| 54.43% | 79 | 1.3 | 536 | 8,690 | 60.9% | 45.5% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 5.2 | 903 | 12,546 | 59.5% | 46.3% | |
| 50.00% | 76 | 5.2 | 677 | 10,560 | 33.3% | 59.2% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.4 | 502 | 8,814 | 46.7% | 47.7% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.2 | 589 | 9,740 | 43.3% | 45.5% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 5.5 | 780 | 10,535 | 54.0% | 47.2% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 1.2 | 612 | 10,210 | 52.0% | 56.3% | |
| 45.71% | 70 | 1.3 | 540 | 9,654 | 48.0% | 44.4% | |
| 57.97% | 69 | 4.1 | 739 | 10,031 | 54.5% | 61.1% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 5.3 | 734 | 11,761 | 52.2% | 44.2% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 5.7 | 1,017 | 11,318 | 36.0% | 56.1% | |
| 39.06% | 64 | 1.5 | 575 | 9,946 | 35.0% | 40.9% | |
| 60.32% | 63 | 5.6 | 880 | 10,370 | 57.1% | 62.9% | |
| 50.00% | 62 | 5.4 | 1,134 | 10,705 | 48.4% | 51.6% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 5.0 | 924 | 10,556 | 46.1% | 58.8% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 5.4 | 850 | 11,481 | 47.8% | 46.0% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 5.2 | 870 | 11,669 | 52.0% | 54.5% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 5.3 | 805 | 9,340 | 43.3% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 56 | 1.5 | 644 | 10,327 | 61.9% | 54.3% | |
| 54.55% | 55 | 4.3 | 763 | 11,771 | 69.6% | 43.8% | |
| 37.04% | 54 | 4.6 | 887 | 10,630 | 15.8% | 48.6% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 1.8 | 586 | 9,963 | 52.6% | 55.9% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 5.5 | 974 | 11,239 | 40.9% | 64.5% | |
| 40.00% | 50 | 1.3 | 600 | 9,290 | 36.4% | 42.9% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.3 | 602 | 9,203 | 45.5% | 59.3% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 1.3 | 560 | 9,627 | 50.0% | 34.6% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 1.4 | 541 | 9,517 | 50.0% | 53.6% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 5.5 | 735 | 10,695 | 72.0% | 40.9% | |
| 46.81% | 47 | 4.8 | 917 | 10,509 | 55.6% | 41.4% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 5.3 | 825 | 11,308 | 62.5% | 37.9% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 5.0 | 740 | 11,266 | 68.2% | 30.4% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 5.3 | 949 | 10,799 | 48.0% | 57.9% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 5.1 | 870 | 11,918 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 1.4 | 624 | 10,102 | 40.0% | 63.0% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 1.3 | 492 | 7,929 | 56.0% | 52.9% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 2.4 | 770 | 10,105 | 71.4% | 45.0% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 5.9 | 833 | 12,088 | 50.0% | 51.7% | |
| 63.16% | 38 | 4.2 | 805 | 11,394 | 71.4% | 52.9% | |
| 60.53% | 38 | 5.2 | 907 | 11,301 | 71.4% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.6 | 512 | 9,931 | 43.8% | 55.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 4.4 | 790 | 10,698 | 50.0% | 31.3% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 2.3 | 783 | 9,303 | 64.7% | 61.1% | |
| 60.00% | 35 | 5.5 | 839 | 10,068 | 63.2% | 56.3% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 5.7 | 925 | 11,027 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 5.7 | 806 | 10,447 | 70.6% | 47.1% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 3.5 | 612 | 10,563 | 57.1% | 52.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 4.9 | 830 | 10,861 | 66.7% | 45.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.7 | 635 | 10,688 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.6 | 895 | 10,315 | 60.0% | 47.1% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 4.7 | 807 | 10,905 | 60.0% | 58.8% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 4.3 | 823 | 10,866 | 20.0% | 61.9% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 1.5 | 594 | 9,987 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 67.74% | 31 | 5.7 | 821 | 11,738 | 66.7% | 68.4% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 5.3 | 805 | 11,388 | 58.3% | 52.6% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 4.5 | 735 | 11,871 | 20.0% | 45.8% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 4.9 | 791 | 10,085 | 47.1% | 41.7% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 5.0 | 884 | 12,647 | 25.0% | 72.2% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 4.8 | 658 | 11,296 | 66.7% | 64.3% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 4.9 | 823 | 12,438 | 88.9% | 43.8% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 825 | 11,083 | 61.5% | 75.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.3 | 969 | 10,821 | 61.5% | 45.5% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.4 | 957 | 12,763 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 5.2 | 853 | 10,250 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.5 | 957 | 10,188 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 4.3 | 835 | 10,469 | 22.2% | 40.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 3.8 | 789 | 10,628 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 4.1 | 748 | 11,444 | 60.0% | 21.4% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 5.6 | 839 | 9,537 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.0 | 791 | 10,466 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.5 | 697 | 11,208 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 1,076 | 11,548 | 85.7% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 4.7 | 899 | 11,981 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 4.9 | 774 | 9,972 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.1 | 986 | 11,233 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.2 | 666 | 10,073 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.0 | 859 | 12,737 | 0.0% | 45.5% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 3.9 | 881 | 11,369 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.9 | 853 | 11,616 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.5 | 809 | 11,576 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.7 | 678 | 9,339 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.8 | 718 | 9,100 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.5 | 672 | 12,318 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 830 | 13,585 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.7 | 752 | 13,059 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,572 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.8 | 945 | 12,776 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.8 | 847 | 13,742 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 5.7 | 852 | 13,731 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.1 | 506 | 7,197 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.6 | 543 | 9,679 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.0 | 968 | 14,700 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.9 | 667 | 8,617 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.3 | 655 | 9,996 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 628 | 9,002 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 870 | 9,857 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 738 | 10,648 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.4 | 697 | 9,912 | 83.3% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 490 | 7,228 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.5 | 627 | 9,476 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 584 | 9,351 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 698 | 10,281 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.7 | 847 | 13,376 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 950 | 11,523 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.0 | 580 | 8,534 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.4 | 1,029 | 10,545 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.8 | 562 | 8,508 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 3.6 | 802 | 9,797 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.6 | 771 | 10,794 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.8 | 862 | 12,420 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 693 | 11,301 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 810 | 12,647 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.4 | 642 | 9,607 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.0 | 842 | 10,512 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 828 | 13,290 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 3.7 | 991 | 12,639 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 890 | 13,773 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.4 | 839 | 6,630 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 1,095 | 14,341 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.5 | 507 | 7,103 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 714 | 9,929 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.1 | 562 | 9,982 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 758 | 12,753 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 842 | 9,452 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 553 | 8,633 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 619 | 10,191 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tahm Kench vs Aphelios - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tahm Kench do against Aphelios in League of Legends?
Tahm Kench wins the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Aphelios's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Tahm Kench do against Aphelios in the early game?
In the early game, Tahm Kench has the advantage against Aphelios with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Tahm Kench players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tahm Kench do against Aphelios in the late game?
In the late game, Tahm Kench takes over the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Tahm Kench scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup?
Tahm Kench wins the matchup against Aphelios with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Tahm Kench is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Tahm Kench build against Aphelios?
The best Tahm Kench build against Aphelios includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tahm Kench runes against Aphelios?
The best Tahm Kench runes against Aphelios use the Resolve primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tahm Kench vs Aphelios matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tahm Kench counter Aphelios?
Yes, Tahm Kench has a favorable matchup against Aphelios with a 60.0% win rate. Tahm Kench strongly counters Aphelios in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Tahm Kench against Aphelios?
When playing Tahm Kench against Aphelios, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.